Peering Into Mini's Tentative Electrification Plan

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Automakers find themselves in the midst of a widespread electrification effort. However, the slow adoption rate of these vehicles has created some trepidation. Rather than roll out fleets of EVs en masse, most manufacturers have chosen to adopt platforms allowing for multiple powertrain configurations, relegating electrics to entirely new sub-brands or transforming lesser nameplates into EV brands.

Daimler is a good example of this. Mercedes-Benz has its EQ sub-brand, while Smart was rejiggered into a nameplate entirely focused on “electro-mobility.”

BMW Group will likely take a similar route with Mini. The brand’s first fully fledged EV is fast approaching, with the company repeatedly suggesting that it might reposition itself as an electric-focused nameplate. Peter Schwarzenbauer, BMW board member and Papa Bear to Mini, Rolls-Royce, and BMW Motorrad (motorcycles), is the man responsible for overseeing the shift, and has offered up a tentative glimpse into Mini’s future.

Schwarzenbauer was interviewed by Automotive News this week. The short-and-sweet gist of that convo is that Mini absolutely intends to make every vehicle in its lineup electric — but it doesn’t plan on rushing headlong into EV-only territory. Like BMW itself, Mini will utilize modular platforms capable of accommodating an array of platforms. When asked if the brand should ditch internal combustion engines, like Smart has, Schwarzenbauer painted a pretty clear picture.

“Electromobility is an excellent fit for our urban, progressive and open-minded customers. The success of the Mini Countryman plug-in hybrid, which accounted for 13 percent of the model’s global sales last year, demonstrates that. To secure the long-term future of Mini, we will enable the range to be all electric, should the customer prefer that,” he explained.

“The key issue is we do not know how quickly electric mobility will spread, so it was strategically important to leave this option open depending on the circumstance. Let me be clear, though, there will not be a single Mini model we plan to launch that a customer won’t be able to order with an electrified drivetrain. The joint venture we founded in China together with Great Wall Motors is in part to ensure that.”

Those Chinese models will not be limited to China, however. While Schwarzenbauer admitted exports are not a guarantee, it is part of the overall strategy.

Schwarzenbauer was also asked about BMW’s mobility program with Daimler. The unlikely team intends to spend 1 billion euros on developing co-owned mobility services. However, the question didn’t revolve around what they were working on, but how long that money would last. While these types of ventures are a hot property for tech firms and automakers, they frequently manifest as money pits with no clear pathway to profitability.

“We shouldn’t view this issue through the same lens as our traditional business, where you invest a certain sum, there is a defined start of production and so on,” Schwarzenbauer said.

“It could be that tomorrow one of our services has an idea that wasn’t part of the business plan and then the funds are exhausted more quickly. It’s also possible the funds last longer than expected because attractive opportunities don’t materialize. Market conditions change much more rapidly in this sector than in our more traditional business areas.”

Getting back to Mini’s first EV, BMW Group doesn’t feel comfortable releasing any details. It’s saving everything for the model’s September debut ahead of the Frankfurt Auto Show. Assembly will commence in Oxford in the second half of 2019; Schwarzenbauer said he expects the vehicle to go on sale in early 2020.

[Image: BMW Group]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Apr 09, 2019

    OK could balancing those wheels be a challenge, or am I imagining problems where none exist?

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Apr 13, 2019

    Pardon the pun, but it shocks me that the Mini Countryman S E Countryman ALL4 (the PHEV) makes up 13% of Mini sales. Take the things people hate about Mini's direction --- making the cars big and heavy and expensive instead of light and lithe and attainable. Add the shameless bad faith that characterizes European PHEVs --- batteries and motors so small that electric-only range is hilariously short and the gas engine constantly interrupts. For a bonus, add a gas engine that (despite its tiny size) isn't clean enough for the car to qualify for many green vehicle incentives such as solo carpool lane access. So. Not good at being a Mini. Not good at being a PHEV. Yet a sales triumph. Huh. I've read that it's actually quite fun to drive, and that it's nice having Mini-type character in a usefully roomy car. Maybe I should stop being such a cynical party-pooper and drive one. But at $37-44k, I'd take a Tesla Model 3 if I want performance and room and green cred, or a bargain basement Fiat 500 Abarth (and a bunch of money left over) if I want performance and cuteness. An almost-cute car with almost-good performance and almost-green characteristics for an almost-okay price doesn't seem a likely sales leader.

  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next