As Justice Department Launches Ford Probe, Automaker Surprises Investors

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

That headline was unavoidable, by the way. On the same day Ford Motor Company released a better than expected first-quarter earnings report, it also revealed the Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into its emissions certification process — a probe that could see fuel economy ratings rolled back.

Wall Street seemed much more interested in the financial news, however, giving the company’s stock a much-needed lift. In the Glass House, Jim Hackett must be smiling.

The testing probe has to deal with Ford’s road load calculations, an issue that came to light earlier this year when Ford launched an investigation of its own. In a filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commision, the automaker warned it “cannot provide assurance that it will not have a material adverse effect.”

Ford claims the “matter currently focuses on issues relating to road load estimations, including analytical modeling and coastdown testing.”

In a statement reported by CNBC, Kim Pittel, Ford’s vice president of sustainability, environment and safety engineering, said, “Our focus is on completing our investigation and a thorough technical review of this matter and cooperating with government and regulatory agencies.”

If the automaker’s math turns out to be wonky, several unnamed models might end up saddled with new, and perhaps unfavorable, fuel economy and emissions figures. The news wasn’t enough to scare off investors, however. The company’s stock rose more than 8 percent in extended Thursday trading, and the climb continues on Friday.

What did investors see? Improved North American margins and profit, plus adjusted earnings per share of 44 cents (unadjusted: 29 cents) — a better return than the forecasted 27 cents. Ford took an axe to its overseas operations in Q1 2019, incurring one-time financial hits. Still, the overseas operating loss of $196 million was a steep climb-down from last quarter’s loss, with the company’s Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions posting profits. South America and China made up the overseas loss. Automotive revenue of $37.24 billion outpaced forecasts, despite the company’s overall revenue falling year-over-year.

Much like in previous quarters, Ford’s bread basket continues to be North America, where earnings before interest and taxes rose to $2.2 billion from Q1 2018’s $1.9 billion. Thank Ford truck sales and an elevated Lincoln brand for that, as well as the 8.7 percent margin (up from 7.8 percent, year over year).

While Ford’s chief financial officer, Bob Shanks, claimed Q1 will probably be the company’s best quarter this year, he sees 2019 delivering “better results” than 2018. For the sake of CEO Jim Hackett, the earnings report is hopefully the start of a new chapter for Ford … and the beginning of a sustained upward trend in the company’s stock. His job depends on it.

“With a solid plan in place, we promised 2019 would be a year of action and execution for Ford, and that’s what we delivered in the first quarter,” said Jim Hackett, Ford president and CEO. “We’re pleased with the progress and the optimism that it brings.”

The coming year brings with it numerous launches of higher-margin vehicles, including the Lincoln Aviator and Corsair, and Ford Super Duty, Explorer, and Escape. The resurrected Ranger pickup went on sale in January.

[Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Apr 28, 2019

    Does anyone know is it going to be ICE powered or BEV? What platform? RWD or FWD? Last time it was Mazda IIRC. I am actually interested. I always liked Probe.

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Apr 29, 2019

    I always thought the Probe name sounded dirty. Maybe that was part of the appeal? It didn't appeal to many: more Mustangs were sold in its first year than the Probe sold in six years.

  • Douglas This timeframe of Mercedes has the self-disintegrating engine wiring harness. Not just the W124, but all of them from the early 90's. Only way to properly fix it is to replace it, which I understand to be difficult to find a new one/do it/pay for. Maybe others have actual experience with doing so and can give better hope. On top of that, it's a NH car with "a little bit of rust", which means to about anyone else in the USA it is probably the rustiest W124 they have ever seen. This is probably a $3000 car on a good day.
  • Formula m How many Hyundai and Kia’s do not have the original engine block it left the factory with 10yrs prior?
  • 1995 SC I will say that year 29 has been a little spendy on my car (Motor Mounts, Injectors and a Supercharger Service since it had to come off for the injectors, ABS Pump and the tool to cycle the valves to bleed the system, Front Calipers, rear pinion seal, transmission service with a new pan that has a drain, a gaggle of capacitors to fix the ride control module and a replacement amplifier for the stereo. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket. The front end got serviced in year 28. On the plus side blank cassettes are increasingly easy to find so I have a solid collection of 90 minute playlists.
  • MaintenanceCosts My own experiences with, well, maintenance costs:Chevy Bolt, ownership from new to 4.5 years, ~$400*Toyota Highlander Hybrid, ownership from 3.5 to 8 years, ~$2400BMW 335i Convertible, ownership from 11.5 to 13 years, ~$1200Acura Legend, ownership from 20 to 29 years, ~$11,500***Includes a new 12V battery and a set of wiper blades. In fairness, bigger bills for coolant and tire replacement are coming in year 5.**Includes replacement of all rubber parts, rebuild of entire suspension and steering system, and conversion of car to OEM 16" wheel set, among other things
  • Jeff Tesla should not be allowed to call its system Full Self-Driving. Very dangerous and misleading.
Next