Second Electric Chevrolet Coming to Michigan

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

That didn’t take long, did it? In a Friday morning announcement, General Motors said it plans to bring a second electric product to the Orion Assembly plant in suburban Detroit, home to the Chevrolet Bolt.

Forget Buick and Cadillac, too. This Bolt-based product is destined to carry the bowtie badge.

Details of the upcoming model are thin. GM would only refer to the “new Chevrolet electric vehicle” as a model “designed and engineered off an advanced version of the current award-winning Bolt EV architecture.”

Product details and timing will have to wait, the automaker said. The product addition, greased by $300 million from GM coffers, will add 400 jobs to the Orion facility. Orion current employs 880 hourly and 130 salaried employees.

“This new Chevrolet electric vehicle is another positive step toward our commitment to an all-electric future,” said GM CEO Mary Barra in a statement. “GM will continue to invest in our U.S. operations where we see opportunities for growth.”

Media reports late last night suggested the model was originally slated for Chinese production, but ongoing trade tensions (and talks) put the kibosh on the plan. While GM didn’t mention China, it did admit the model had been “slated for production outside of the U.S.”

“Moving production to a U.S. manufacturing plant supports the rules of origin provisions in the proposed United States, Mexico and Canada Agreement,” GM stated.

It’s easy to see the move as a ploy to lower political pressure on the company in the United States. After mothballing Lordstown Assembly and placing Detroit-Hamtramck’s post-January 2020 future in doubt, GM saw no shortage of backlash, not the least of which came from President Donald Trump. GM took pains to mention new opportunities for displaced workers in its media release.

“In addition to the job growth at the Orion plant, GM has job opportunities at several other U.S. manufacturing plants for virtually all U.S. hourly employees impacted by the recent announcement of unallocated plants,” the company stated. Odd that the announcement comes with no timeline attached…

As for the mystery Chevrolet model — you’re all thinking it’s a crossover, and so are we. No other bodystyle makes sense for a new EV. Even if the Bolt’s battery pack remains untouched, the hatchback’s 238 miles of range should keep a heavier, less aerodynamic crossover in the industry-acceptable 200-plus mile zone.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Mar 23, 2019

    I'd like to go full EV when I get rid of my 2013 Volt but I could never drive something as dorky and cheap looking on the inside as the Bolt. Hoping Cadillac comes up with a decent looking EV sedan that I can pick up used(lease return)for dirt like I did the Volt.

  • Cognoscenti Cognoscenti on Mar 26, 2019

    They could just call this new crossover EV the Volt. Wait, never mind: that makes too much sense.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next