QOTD: Which Classic(s) to Resurrect?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Despite the presence of the well-regarded, all-new Ram 1500 on the market, penny-pinching truck buyers still have the opportunity to save cash while remaining true to their preferred brand. The 1500 Classic, a “new old” pickup, keeps the previous-generation model alive as a lower-priced alternative. It’s looking like this won’t simply be a single model year experiment, either.

Not that Fiat Chrysler is the sole player of this game. For 2019, the previous-gen Chevrolet Silverado soldiers on alongside its fresh-faced successor. Ask for an “LD” model. And anyone remember the Volkswagen City Golf and City Jetta? Keeping decently popular old relics around beyond their best-before date can earn an automaker extra spending money.

But what if these so-called classics were actual classics?

Instead of thinking automakers for this example, think gunmakers for a moment. Sorry for the terrifying imagery, but it’s valid. Smith & Wesson offers a line of handguns under the banner “Classic.” Vintage models, only brand new and ready to buy — not a reproduction sold by another company. Colt did something similar recently, offering a buyers a new 1903 Pocket Hammerless — a slick .32 autoloader whose production run ended in 1945. In this case, Colt licensed the gun’s manufacture to another company.

You get the idea. A long-out-of-production model returns to the lineup, ready to please both traditionalists and individualists.

What if an automaker did it? Imagine you’ve woken up in a world where it’s suddenly feasible for an OEM to legally offer, say, a few classic models at something approaching a normal price. This wouldn’t be a direct reproduction, as that low-volume vehicle law isn’t all that fleshed out, and major automakers wouldn’t apply anyway. Let’s just say that, on this particular morning, regulations were loosened and your favorite automaker felt generous.

There’d be available radial tires, power front disc brakes and steering, maybe anti-lock, and seatbelts, all to sweeten the proposition. Perhaps even a beefed-up frame and reinforced body for increased crash performance. Engines and tranny? In the interest of authenticity, those would remain stock. The one automotive brand of your choice would offer three (no more, let’s not get greedy) models dating from anywhere in its history.

Outwardly, these things would be dead ringers — and they could be yours.

So, which brand will it be, and which three vehicles will get new life? The only asterisk here is that the automaker which originally built the vehicle must still exist. No Duesenbergs or Packards, sorry.

[Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 105 comments
  • VWGTI VWGTI on Mar 13, 2019

    2 1964 Lincoln Continentals: 1 hardtop 1 convertible

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Mar 15, 2019

    Hmm. Three models from one brand from a company that must still exist as an automobile concern. Pity about the "still exists" constraint, without it the answer is clearly Studebaker (Avanti, Hawk, Champ). I like the Volvo angle though. My list: 240, 850, 1800.

  • Jkross22 Sure, but it depends on the price. All EVs cost too much and I'm talking about all costs. Depreciation, lack of public/available/reliable charging, concerns about repairability (H/K). Look at the battering the Mercedes and Ford EV's are taking on depreciation. As another site mentioned in the last few days, cars aren't supposed to depreciate by 40-50% in a year or 2.
  • Jkross22 Ford already has an affordable EV. 2 year old Mach-E's are extraordinarily affordable.
  • Lou_BC How does the lower case "armada" differ from the upper case "Armada"?
  • TMA1 Question no one asked: "What anonymous blob with ugly wheels will the Chinese market like?"BMW designers: "Here's your new 4-series."see also: Lincoln Nautilus
  • Ivor Honda with Toyota engine and powertrain would be the perfect choice..we need to dump the turbos n cut. 😀
Next