EPA: Automakers Too Reliant on Credits for Emissions Compliance

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The Environmental Protection Agency released its annual assessment of new vehicles yesterday, and it was filled with good news. On average, fuel economy continues to improve. Cars are not getting heavier, horsepower keeps going up, and every major manufacturer managed was in compliance with greenhouse gas standards through the 2017 model year. However, the EPA also said it’s concerned that manufacturers frequently tap into stored-up regulatory credits to make this possible.

“Most large manufacturers used banked credits, along with technology improvements, to maintain compliance in model year 2017. Three large manufacturers achieved compliance based on the emission performance of their vehicles, without utilizing additional banked credits,” the agency explained.

The ability to bank credits by over-complying in a given year is seen by some environmental groups as a way for corporations to shirk their responsibility to the planet. But EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler’s concerns regarding the system rest elsewhere.

“Today’s report shows that while the auto industry continues to increase fuel economy, there are legitimate concerns about the ability to cost-effectively achieve the Obama administration’s standards in the near future,” Wheeler said.

Officially, the industry used fewer credits in 2017 than it did in 2016 and only exhausted about 7 percent of the total balance. But most of those are set to expire at the end of the 2021 model year. That’s significant because the EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are in the process of delivering less-stringent efficiency standards that would take effect that same year.

Over the summer, the agencies proposed capping mileage requirements around 37 mpg after 2020 — instead of setting them at roughly 47 mpg by 2025, which was the path chosen under President Obama’s administration. According to Bloomberg, the EPA’s opinion on the matter has upset several environmental groups.

“While the Trump administration is moving to gut the clean car standards, its own data shows the current standards are working,” said Luke Tonachel, director for clean vehicles and fuels at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Automakers are innovating and improving the performance of their fleets, and tailpipe emissions continue to plummet.”

It’s true that manufacturers are investing heavily in alternative powertrains that pass the pollution buck to regional energy providers, but suggesting that they’re prepared to comply with the next decade’s efficiency requirements is little more than a guess. The University of Michigan has repeatedly reported that, while fleet-wide efficiencies continue to improve, practical sales-weighted fuel economy averages haven’t truly changed in the United States since MY 2014 — due primarily to increased consumer interest in larger vehicles, like crossovers and SUVs.

Dan Becker, director of the Center for Auto Safety’s Safe Climate Campaign, said overwhelming evidence exists that the Trump administration should be working harder to support emissions reductions and avoid a rollback at all costs. Last year, he said the automotive industry projected a 1 mpg improvement for the 2017 model year. In reality, they only managed to achieve around 0.2 mpg.

“Today’s EPA report demonstrates the chasm between what the rules were supposed to produce and what automakers delivered,” Becker told Bloomberg.

Obviously, the White House sees things as the same… but also very differently. Rather than a signal to double down on environmental legislation, it believes industry failures and consumer habits are at odds with the existing efficiency standards. The Trump administration imagines this as a pathway toward deregulation. The possibility of an industry-wide reliance on credits just creates more ammunition for their argument.

Presently, the world’s largest automakers bookend the range of corporate efficiency averages; Honda’s on top with 29.4 mpg while Fiat Chrysler sits in last place at 21.2 mpg. Both have a long way to climb before they’re complaint with 2020’s levels, though Honda could theoretically achieve the goal if it continues improving efficiency at its current pace. Still, it would be one of the only manufacturers to do so under that metric. The rest will likely become increasingly depending on credits (which will eventually end up being reset), while diving headlong into electrification.

[LanaElcova/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 36 comments
  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Mar 08, 2019

    Honestly, the carmakers need to crap or get off the pot. They don't want to side with the President outright because politics, and they don't want to come out and say outright "we can't do it" because odds are some carmakers can and then they look like idiots. Fine then, meet the standards or pay the fines, but as has been mentioned, if your plan is just to pay the low fines you had better be giving to the right PACs this cycle because frankly, I think in 2020 you are going to find a much less receptive audience at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave and my sympathy ran out right around the first TARP bailout.

    • DenverMike DenverMike on Mar 08, 2019

      CAFE has simply been bastardized by political movements/agendas. Its original mission had absolutely nothing to do with forcing electric car adoption on a grand scale. If a decent percentage of consumers wanted EV, it'd be a different story, and obviously not much more can be done to ICE vehicles to drastically improve efficiency. No matter how good it feels, or who it gets happy, it makes zero sense dictating what automakers can build and offer, when consumers want something else entirely, or even a direct opposite. Even Honda would have to sell at least 15% EVs to comply. Forget about FCA, we're talking closer to 50% EVs, and likely 4 EVs for every Hellcat.

  • DenverMike DenverMike on Mar 09, 2019

    BAF0 didn't resurface to be anyone but "BAF0", full strength. For a true sociopath, what would be the point of that and not sticking to his well known, warped and deranged agenda and mission? Yeah he was instantly recognized, no doubt about it and I've only spotted him, "Charles James" bringing up the Chicken tax once, but it's gotta be killing him. I guess the moderators don't care, as it adds a couple clicks a day or hour. But as longs as he's not using profanity nor insulting other commenters, the infamous and totally banned BAF0 (Big Al from 0Z), probably using a new IP, found a loophole in the system.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next