Sole of the UX: Crossover Cross-branding at Its Worst?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Lexus unveiled a collaboration with Nike and designer John Elliot at New York Fashion Week, celebrating both human and automotive footwear. The finished piece, titled “Sole of the UX,” is scheduled to make additional appearances across the country later this year, touring with a matching pair of Nike AF1 shoes.

After conducting a bit of research, Elliott appears to be a fashion designer specializing in the least imaginative streetwear ever to enter mass production. His beige drawstring pants, which run about $200 USD, are probably the most creative item in his entire catalog. The brunt of his collection involves plain shirts and lots of faded denim.

While not hideous by any means, it’s devoid of any unique style. The articles of clothing Elliot specializes in are the kind of pieces you’d wear while running errands or relaxing at home. They just cost a lot more. However, as Elliot openly describes his take on fashion as intentionally “basic,” there’s little reason to get ultra salty over how so much of his fashion line resembles a high-quality burlap sack. Instead, let’s focus our collective ire on Lexus.

Last year, the brand tapped minimalist Pedro Henriques to cover half of a UX crossover in white paint and toss some black splotches on an LFA coupe. While we don’t have problems with art cars, Lexus’ offerings from 2018 were beyond bland. I placed their level of excitement and memorability somewhere between eating a bowl of dry cereal and ordering a package of socks online.

Unfortunately, the automaker’s creative aspirations don’t appear to have evolved and absolutely reek of corporate shenanigans. Elliott is probably most famous for working with Nike, specifically on the latest incarnation of its Air Force 1 sneakers. Despite the shoes looking like the prescription jobs my grandfather wore in 1990, they’ve become popular enough for some high level cross-branding with Lexus.

Ultimately, this just means a new set of shoe-inspired tires. Typically, this works backwards — with shoe companies delivering special edition footwear based on a specific automotive brands or models.

This time around, we got a shoe-based car instead of the usual car-based shoe. Maybe that’s not be the best way to explain the situation. The only thing that has really changed on the Lexus is the rubber, which does match the famous white Nikes right down to the swoosh. But it all feels so lazy. Save for Elliot’s own name on the rear doors and the completely white paint job, there’s nothing else to set this car apart from a standard Lexus UX — it even wears stock wheels.

The most unpalatable aspect of this has precious little to do with design and everything to do with the clumsy attempt at cross-branding. Nike wanted to further promote the shoe, Lexus wanted to highlight the brand’s involvement, and John Elliot knew this would help raise awareness of his clothing line. You can almost hear the dull teleconference where this idea was pushed through as you gaze into the UX’s chalky rounds.

“We were excited to merge the streetwear narrative and design cues of our Air Force 1 with a brand like Lexus,” Elliot said at the unveiling. “We’re thankful they’ve allowed us to use this moment to celebrate the arts and to bring extra energy to our take on a classic … It’s fun to partner with brands that typically live outside the fashion community because it allows us to evolve and continue to push our own boundaries.”

We would like to congratulate Mr. Elliot for not forgetting to mention every key player involved in this utterly transparent business decision masquerading as art. But what the hell constitutes “the streetwear narrative?” At least Pedro Henriques cooked up a story about how his work with Lexus allowed for him to design a piece that says something about contemporary living.

On the upside, the Sole of the UX debut also included a charity auction benefiting Inner-City Arts in Los Angeles. As for the car, it’s effectively a mobile art installation aimed at promoting the companies involved to key demographics ( young urbanites with extra cash). Lexus has no intention of selling its UX with white rubber and Nike isn’t going to start competing with Goodyear — not that you could safely drive on these tires if they did.

[Images: Lexus; John Elliot]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 33 comments
  • Cdotson Cdotson on Feb 14, 2019

    Overpriced consumerist crap devoid of unique style? PURPOSE MADE for Lexus tie-in.

    • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on Feb 14, 2019

      I long for the days when Toyota was devoid of unique style. Is it your take that their designers assumed new German cars sell because they're ugly, so Lexus is ripping off the German's gimmick of being hideous? I tend to look at the spindle as being repellent in its own way.

  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Feb 14, 2019

    Looking at those shoes, it sounds like their target audience is Nurse Ratched.

  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Next