Wall Street Wary of Tesla's New 34-year-old CFO

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Tesla’s stock price took a tumble after CEO Elon Musk announced, at the end of a Thursday night earnings call, that Chief Financial Officer Deepak Ahuja was heading into retirement.

Ahuja joined Tesla in 2008, 15 years after first joining Ford and becoming CFO of its AutoAlliance joint venture with Mazda. He then served in an identical role for Ford’s southern Africa region. At Tesla, Ahuja returned to the CFO role after a two-year retirement hiatus from 2015 to 2017.

Ahuja’s successor doesn’t have quite as lengthy a CV to draw from. Twenty-two years younger than his predecessor and just six years out of business school, Zach Kirkhorn’s rise to the CFO spot has some analysts rattled.

Kirkhorn, 34, joined Tesla nine years ago and serves as the company’s VP of finance. While a business school degree is something you’d want to see in a chief financial officer’s past, Kirkhorn’s past does not contain experience in the CFO chair.

Tesla’s stock fell nearly four percent in early Thursday trading, rebounding to just below Wednesday’s close by afternoon.

As reported by CNBC, the loss of Ahuja is seen by many as a threat to the company’s stability, despite the automaker’s two consecutive quarters of profitability and the ironing out of production hurdles on the Model 3 line. No shortage of braintrust has left the company as of late, especially in the past year.

AB Bernstein wrote, “We see the departure as a significant loss of institutional knowledge, and note that Kirkhorn is a first-time public company CFO, just six years removed from business school.”

Goldman Sachs is of a similar mind, telling investors, “We believe the changeover may cause some uncertainty for investors as Tesla just saw two consecutive quarters of profitability and positive cash flow, and we see potential for a less stable path forward due to a sequential step-down in deliveries, working capital headwinds and convertible debt payment.”

J.P. Morgan Chase expects “investors to react negatively to the replacement of Deepak Ahuja,” while Barclays holds a pessimistic outlook for the stock, citing Kirkhorn’s lack of experience.

Deutsche Bank doesn’t think much of Ahuja’s departure, calling his retirement “unremarkable.” While the automaker faces flattening production in America, an influx of vehicles to Europe and China bodes well for the future, the bank said.

While Kirkhorn will hold the reins once Ahuja departs in the coming months, his predecessor apparently isn’t disappearing to a desert island. In his earnings call, Musk said the retiring CFO will be held on as an advisor.

[Image: LinkedIn]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 15 comments
  • Hondah35 Hondah35 on Jan 31, 2019

    If I were this guy I would run quickly in the other direction. He has bagholder written all over him.

  • NN NN on Feb 01, 2019

    Similar to how Kushner is Trumps highest trusted advisor, and is behind a lot of policy decisions affecting us all.

    • Xtoyota Xtoyota on Feb 01, 2019

      That didn't take long for POLITICS to get involved :=(

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next