Ford CEO Issues No-nonsense Letter to Employees, Seeks Doubling of Profits

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
ford ceo issues no nonsense letter to employees seeks doubling of profits

Ford’s chief executive, Jim Hackett, told employees Thursday evening that 2019 cannot be a repeat of last year.

“2018 was mediocre by any standard,” Hackett said in an email to employees. “Yes, we made $7 billion last year. But think of it this way: this represents a 4.4 percent operating margin, about half what we believe is an appropriate margin. So we are aiming for much closer to $14 billion.”

Despite being at the helm of The Blue Oval for nearly two years. Hackett’s Ford continues to endure a slipping share price and a market cap of 34.5 billion — substantially less than General Motors’.

“I become mad for a short time. Likely mad at myself, but also because I know we are better than that,” the CEO said of Ford’s current situation. “I know that our competition hasn’t been better than us by magic.”

Reuters, which was the first to report Hackett’s letter to staff, outlined recent moves aimed at making the company more competitive, while also citing its current financial situation. Ford, which announced fourth-quarter results on Wednesday, reported a $7 billion operating profit for 2018, with a profit margin of 4.4 percent. That’s significantly less than 2017’s 6.1 percent, but last year wasn’t particularly kind to the industry as a whole — giving Ford an easy out that Hackett wisely isn’t interested in taking.

He claimed it was “time to bury [2018] in a deep grave, grieve over what might have been and become super focused on meeting, and, in fact, exceeding this year’s plan.”

Ford’s already trimming down its lineup and restructuring its global operations, including plans for widespread job cuts in Europe. It also recently announced an alliance with Volkswagen to jointly produce commercial vehicles before potentially moving on to co-developed electric and self-driving vehicles. Hackett claimed Ford accelerated its timeline for the introduction of new EVs and the electrification of its broader portfolio since taking the helm of the company.

Hackett’s letter also asked what the company could do about China, a region where General Motors has thrived and most other automakers see a future, but Ford has repeatedly struggled with.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Join the conversation
4 of 63 comments
  • Namesakeone Namesakeone on Jan 28, 2019

    Somehow, I don't believe this is all on Mark Hackett. His board, like a lot of stockholders, demands huge results at any cost. What usually happens is the executives capitulate, the stock goes up quickly and dramatically, and...the stockholders sell for a quick profit and go after someone else's company. And everyone's happy. Well, everyone except the employees that got laid off, the employees that are about to be laid off (from a severely weakened company), the customers who have an inferior product, the dealers who now have to sell an outdated product (because the R&D teams are usually the first to go), and the stakeholders. But the executives get their bonuses, and the stockholders got their profits, so they're happy enough for all of them!

  • Danio3834 Danio3834 on Jan 28, 2019

    He's concerned about margin, yet so far most of the plans and direction we've heard are margin constraining. Mass electrification, mobility dead ends, making their highest margin vehicles with needlessly expensive materials and tech. With all this whiz bang talk, they can't seem to get customers to pay more to make up for increased costs. Ford needs to wake up and realize that it's a mainstream automaker and not some glamorous tech company. Wall Street isn't buying it and neither do customers. They've made a move to cut cars which will improve margin but decrease revenue. I'm not saying they shouldn't have done that because I don't believe they could effectively increase margins on cars. But while the margin looks better on paper, you can't put margin in the bank either.

    • See 1 previous
    • Danio3834 Danio3834 on Jan 29, 2019

      @DenverMike Not sure if you read what I wrote or not. Anyway: >Electric vehicles, ride sharing, etc, aren’t exactly rocket science, but a big company can spread whatever losses over high-volume, very profitable vehicles. This is a big part of the margin erosion problem. >Less revenue, less sales doesn’t necessarily mean less net profits. If Wall Street can’t understand this, why should anyone care what they think? Everyone understands this, especially Wall Street. They aren't being punished for cutting cars, on the contrary. They're being punished for their hubris of a plan to be "Mobility" and all the talk about how many profit sucking EVs they will crank out without elaborating on how they will actually improve their margins.

  • Fahrvergnugen NA Miata goes topless as long as roads are dry and heater is running, windscreen in place.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic As a side note, have you looked at a Consumers Report lately? In the past, they would compare 3 or 4 station wagons, or compact SUVs, or sedans per edition. Now, auto reporting is reduced to a report on one single vehicle in the entire edition. I guess CR realized that cars are not as important as they once were.
  • Fred Private equity is only concerned with making money. Not in content. The only way to deal with it, is to choose your sites wisely. Even that doesn't work out. Just look at AM/FM radio for a failing business model that is dominated by a few large corporations.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic Lots of dynamics here:[list][*]people are creatures of habit, they will stick with one or two web sites, one or two magazines, etc; and will only look at something different if recommended by others[/*][*]Generation Y & Z is not "car crazy" like Baby Boomers. We saw a car as freedom and still do. Today, most youth text or face call, and are focused on their cell phone. Some don't even leave the house with virtual learning[/*][*]New car/truck introductions are passé; COVID knocked a hole in car shows; spectacular vehicle introductions are history.[/*][*]I was in the market for a replacement vehicle, but got scared off by the current used and new prices. I'll wait another 12 to 18 months. By that time, the car I was interested in will be obsolete or no longer available. Therefore, no reason to research till the market calms down. [/*][*]the number of auto related web sites has ballooned in the last 10 to 15 years. However, there are a diminishing number of taps on their servers as the Baby Boomers and Gen X fall off the radar scope. [/*][/list]Based on the above, the whole auto publishing industry (magazine, web sites, catalogs, brochures, etc) is taking a hit. The loss of editors and writers is apparent in all of publishing. This is structural, no way around it.
  • Dukeisduke I still think the name Bzzzzzzzzzzt! would have been better.