Report: Fiat Chrysler to Open 'New' Assembly Plant in Detroit

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

While General Motors is busy “unallocating” some of its plants, Fiat Chrysler is opening a new one. How’s that for optics?

The company will reportedly convert an existing facility, the so-called Mack Avenue Engine II plant, one which began making small V6 engines in the year 2000 but was idled about five years ago. This new vehicle assembly plant is slated to make the three-row Grand Cherokee.

Wait, what?

According to a report in The Detroit News, people familiar with the matter have said the new assembly plant will build a new three-row Jeep Grand Cherokee for model year 2021. This is surprising, since the company has already approved plans to spend six months of next year retooling its Warren Truck Assembly Plant in an effort to prepare for production of a 2021 full-size three-row SUV, the Jeep Wagoneer.

Sketching out this timeline on the back of a napkin, this could mean that Jeep will have a pair of new three-row SUVs for the 2021 model year: a unibody machine to go up against the Explorer et al, plus a bigger brute to take on the Suburban and its ilk. Far-fetched? Maybe. But a guy can dream.

As a whole, it is estimated that FCA is running at greater than 90 percent capacity, compared to GM and Ford’s 72 and 81 percent (respectively) through the end of November. In particular, the FCA plant of Jefferson North is said to be bursting at the seams, humming along at 130 percent capacity cranking out Grand Cherokee and Durango SUVs.

With these capacity numbers, FCA is playing an animated game of musical chairs, shuffling product around in a bid to keep production up, instead of simply idling plants for retooling. Firing up the old Mack Engine II building for a three-row Grand Cherokee would permit FCA the luxury of producing such a machine while retooling Jefferson for the next-gen GC.

Jeep is red hot right now and well on its way to moving a million units annually. Year to date, the brand has sold 892,778 vehicles and found homes for 73,784 rigs in November alone. With the addition of the Gladiator pickup plus a pair of three-row SUVs, it wouldn’t be much of a stretch to make up that difference.

Regarding the physical buildings on site, the Mack Avenue Engine Complex currently cranks out an abundance of 3.6-liter Pentastar engines, plus the 3.2L Pentastar that finds a home in the Jeep Cherokee. The “II” part of the complex made the discontinued 3.7-liter V6 and was idled in September 9th, 2012.

Signs look good for that facility to hum once more. An official announcement is expected late next week.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • AJ AJ on Dec 08, 2018

    Although my toy is a Jeep TJ, I've always had Honda or Toyota in my garage. I have to say, of the five vehicles that I have my eye on for my next daily driver, three are FCA.

  • Steve203 Steve203 on Dec 09, 2018

    I am looking forward to the official press release from FCA, because I have questions about what has been leaked. From what I have read, Mack II only has 650,000 of space. That isn't much for a final assembly line. They would either have to build a conveyor to bring bodies from the Jefferson North body plant, if it has the extra capacity, or build a new body plant on the site of the old Hudson parts warehouse and axle plant which was cleared a few years ago, with a conveyor over Mack and the railroad tracks. Either way, 400 new jobs doesn't seem anywhere near enough to staff a final assembly line. The Rouge truck final assembly building is 2M sqft and requires 1,000 people per shift. Can't shake the thought that FCA would be happier if it just bought the GM Detroit plant and moved the GC in there. Marchionne had been complaining for years that he couldn't get enough GCs out of Jefferson North. And, in all this discussion of 3 row GCs and 2 row GCs, I have not seen any mention of the Durango. The Durango has been the defacto 3 row GC. will it be discontinued, or will the name move back to the pickup platform? In an interview last June, Marchionne said that 22 was the date for a totally new GC, in both 2 and 3 row versions. Wouldn't take much to bump that up to 21 as Marchionne said the platform development was done last spring. The Jeep timeline calls for 22 to be the debut of a new Renegade, new Cherokee, and a "low D 3 row", which I would interpret as a replacement for Journey, as well as the Wagoneer.

  • Theflyersfan OK, I'm going to stretch the words "positive change" to the breaking point here, but there might be some positive change going on with the beaver grille here. This picture was at Car and Driver. You'll notice that the grille now dives into a larger lower air intake instead of really standing out in a sea of plastic. In darker colors like this blue, it somewhat conceals the absolute obscene amount of real estate this unneeded monstrosity of a failed styling attempt takes up. The Euro front plate might be hiding some sins as well. You be the judge.
  • Theflyersfan I know given the body style they'll sell dozens, but for those of us who grew up wanting a nice Prelude Si with 4WS but our student budgets said no way, it'd be interesting to see if Honda can persuade GenX-ers to open their wallets for one. Civic Type-R powertrain in a coupe body style? Mild hybrid if they have to? The holy grail will still be if Honda gives the ultimate middle finger towards all things EV and hybrid, hides a few engineers in the basement away from spy cameras and leaks, comes up with a limited run of 9,000 rpm engines and gives us the last gasp of the S2000 once again. A send off to remind us of when once they screamed before everything sounds like a whirring appliance.
  • Jeff Nice concept car. One can only dream.
  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
Next