QOTD: Unlikely Complaints?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Sitting in a new, unfamiliar vehicle can breed a nearly limitless range of emotions and observations. Excitement, lust, desire … and annoyance.

Just as one design flourish or interior feature can turn interest into a buy, another can turn off prospective customers to such a degree that a sale becomes impossible. Sure, to the experienced observer, these minor complaints might appear frivolous, but the customer is always right. Or are they?

Again, the list is endless, but I can provide two examples of minor feature love/hate from my own family.

My mother purchased her first car based partly on price, but also on the deep-rooted appeal of the ’76 Plymouth Volare’s fender-mounted turn signals. Those small lenses were a huge factor in the decision to purchase a car that ultimately turned out to be a disastrous lemon. A rusty lemon, too.

Reversing the situation, I took my sister for a spin last summer in a vehicle I figured she’d adore. As a parent of two kids and owner of a dog, it seemed likely that her aging, domestic two-row crossover might lose some of its lustre, at least in her mind, after sitting in what I felt was a right-sized, three-row domestic crossover. (I spent a considerable amount of time driving two GMC Acadias last summer; this one was the too-pricey Denali version.)

As I wrote at the time, the Acadia is a vehicle that tries its hardest not to annoy the driver. Xanax oozes from the model’s completely unremarkable yet unobjectionable steering and suspension and transmission. Power isn’t an issue. And the extra rear cargo area (with the third row folded flat) might be just the ticket for a normal-sized family used to squeezing all of their stuff into a slightly smaller vehicle.

My sister’s chief complaint about the Acadia amounted to the windshield being too steeply raked (in her view, the trailing edge of the windshield was too far aft in relation to the driver). This observation threw me off guard, as it wasn’t something I ever considered could annoy a driver. True, her older vehicle’s front glass rested in a more upright fashion, but headroom and visibility wasn’t a problem, so it’s not like the windshield was impeding the operation of the vehicle or intruding into a driver’s personal space. And yet this might have been something that took a buyer forever out of the Acadia camp.

Yes, there’s limitless ways in which a vehicle can turn someone on or off. In your travels, what’s the most minor complaint you’ve heard someone give as reason for not buying a car?

[Image: Steph Willems/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 67 comments
  • Arach Arach on Dec 14, 2018

    When the DIC and the manual controls are opposite. its almost a deal breaker on Hyundais that you turn the dial DOWN to increase the speed of the windshield wipers, but in the DIC the bar moves UP. How is that intuitive to anyone? I've had the car three years and sometimes I get so mad at it I just drive without wipers on.

  • Multicam Multicam on Dec 16, 2018

    My wife’s 2012 Camaro had the e-brake lever on the right side of the center console, so you had to reach over the cupholder area to operate it. Drove me nuts. That car’s window button was in an awkward place too, angled in an annoying way. Screw that car, so glad we sold it. Our current and only car is a brand new 4Runner which I have yet to sit in or drive, but once I get home from this deployment I’m sure I’ll find some weird quirks about it. I’m just happy to have a real SUV waiting for me instead of that POS Camaro.

  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
  • ChristianWimmer Best-looking current BMW in my opinion.
  • Analoggrotto Looks like a cheap Hyundai.
Next