Ford Launches Phase One of Its Restructuring Plan; Changes Target Money-losing European Arm

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford Europe announced it had shuffled its leadership on Friday as part of a larger restructuring plan, appointing executives in Germany and the United Kingdom to oversee “ Sprint to 6 Reset and Redesign.” The strategy seeks to achieve a 6 percent EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) margin, investing only in products and services that it believes best support long-term, sustainably and profitable business.

“Ford is implementing key leadership and organizational changes to improve the fitness and agility of its European operations as it undergoes a fundamental reset and redesign of its business,” the company said in an announcement that emphasized creating operational agility.

While the full scope of the plan has yet to be announced, layoffs and factory closings seem highly probable. Ford said announcements concerning the details of the restructuring are expected between now and the beginning of 2020. Europe is expected to be the primary focus during the initial months, however. Ford Europe lost nearly $250 million in the third quarter of 2018, significantly worse than it managed in 2017. The company now expects to see a net loss for the region this year.

Head of quality, Gunnar Herrmann, will front the restructuring process in Germany, while Graham Hoare will perform similar work in the United Kingdom. Hoare was previously responsible for Ford’s testing and development operations. Meanwhile, Kevin Reynolds, executive director for strategy, has elected to retire after more than 40 years with the company.

“Gunnar and Graham bring vast expertise to their new roles leading our reset and redesign plan in their respective countries,” Steve Armstrong, group vice president and president, Europe, Middle East and Africa, said in a statement. “Working closely with the rest of the European leadership team, they will play a key role in creating a long-term sustainably profitable business for the benefit of our customers, employees, partners and communities.”

Some of those employees are likely in for some harder times in the interim, though. Morgan Stanley previously suggested that the bulk of Ford’s $11 billion global restructuring plan will focus on Europe, leaving the region to endure the bulk of 25,000 global job losses it believes Ford has planned. Analyst Adam Jonas valued the automaker’s European businesses at “negative $7 billion.” While Ford was fast to refute Jonas’ claims, saying it had not provided Morgan Stanley with any pertinent information, it also did not say those claims were overblown — just that they were speculative.

“We forecast Ford Europe to post an accumulated loss of $3.6 billion from 2019 through 2021 with increased losses each year. By 2021, our forecast of Ford Europe’s Adjusted EBIT margin is negative 4.5% which we estimate would make Ford the least profitable [automaker] in that market,” Morgan Stanley said in an October report.

In July, Ford CFO Bob Shanks noted that most of Ford’s European vehicle range was unprofitable. By his estimation, the worst offenders were comprised “principally of cars and multi-activity vehicles such as C-Max.”

The company’s larger vans, utility vehicles, and the Mustang, however, are performing comparatively well. Most seem to believe that Ford will cull those unprofitable models from its European lineup while attempting to get more SUVs and crossovers to market. Ford has indicated this will likely be a core aspect of its restructuring plan.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 34 comments
  • Derbagger Derbagger on Dec 08, 2018

    I'm thinking one way of reducing cost is through economies of scale. Sell some of your European cars like the focus Fiesta and Mondeo in other markets. The US for instance.

  • Steve203 Steve203 on Dec 09, 2018

    Reading other articles about a rumored VW-Ford tie up, I don't think this is only about the US. I think it's global. The Ford mothership in Dearborn has made it clear that it's not interested in spending anything on any sort of passenger car, especially anything in the B or C segment. Outside of North America, if you want to be a mass market brand, you really need to be in the B and C segments, but without US market volume, the amortization charge/unit for those products in Europe or China rises, and crimps profits. VW's Skoda division is desperately looking for more production capacity, where labor is cheap. Skoda is reported to be particularly interested in Romania or Turkey. Ford has plants in Romania and Turkey. The next gen Fabia, for instance, could be built in the Romanian Ford plant, along side a badge engineered Ford Fiesta version. Same thing in China, where Ford has been hammered lately. With all the products Ford doesn't want to get it's hands dirty with being contracted out to VW, Dearborn can concentrate on what it really wants to sell.

    • El scotto El scotto on Dec 10, 2018

      It's a great little Fabia; it deserves more than lip service.

  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
Next