Uber's Quarterly Losses Reach $1.1 Billion in Third Quarter

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Uber’s in a bit of trouble after quarterly losses surged to $1.1 billion dollars. The ride-hailing giant has watched its sales growth dwindle this year, despite an expensive attempt to promote its global expansion.

It’s not the kind of thing you want to see from a company at the forefront of “revolutionizing” the automotive sector, especially since so many automakers seem keen on copying aspects of its business model.

Still planning on an initial public offering in 2019, Uber really could have used good news. However, according to figures released on Wednesday, revenue growth of 38 percent in the third quarter half of what it was half a year ago. It’s also still largely unprofitable, but that has a lot to do with what’s on its plate right now.

The ride-hailing company is currently working toward developing a traffic analytics program, a transport logistics management system, food delivery services, autonomous vehicles, and electric scooter rentals. That’s in addition to spending a fortune in the hopes it can break into new markets across the globe.

According to Bloomberg, Uber released a limited set of financial figures on Wednesday, offering a glimpse into its food delivery business for the first time. Uber Eats generated $2.1 billion in gross bookings, representing 17 percent of Uber’s gross bookings last quarter. However, its core ride-hailing business is in trouble and side projects aren’t making up the difference (due to the sizable investments needed just to get the ball rolling).

From Bloomberg:

On stage at the Wall Street Journal technology conference on Tuesday, Chief Executive Officer Dara Khosrowshahi defended the company’s ability to achieve profitability. He argued that some ride-hailing markets generate profit for Uber after accounting for local operations teams, drivers and other regional expenses. In the U.S., however, the business is not profitable even by this lower standard. “In the U.S., which is our largest market, we’re in a big battle” with Lyft Inc., he said.

Khosrowshahi has said publicly that Uber is targeting a public offering in the second half of 2019. Privately, he’s told investors that he’s aiming for the first half of the year, people familiar with the matter have told Bloomberg. Lyft is also considering an IPO in the first half of next year, people have told Bloomberg.

Uber was holding on to $6.55 billion in cash at the end of the quarter, which does not include the $500 million it recently raised from Toyota Motor Corp. and its $2 billion debt offering. It’s also a little unfair to call its current losses a backslide. While the company saw $2.6 billion in revenue in the first quarter of 2018, up from $2.4 billion in the previous quarter, that was largely due to merging businesses in Russia and Southeast Asia with local competitors.

“We had another strong quarter for a business of our size and global scope,” said Chief Financial Officer Nelson Chai. “As we look ahead to an IPO and beyond, we are investing in future growth across our platform, including in food, freight, electric bikes and scooters, and high-potential markets in India and the Middle East where we continue to solidify our leadership position.”

[Image: Sandeepnewstyle/ Wikimedia Commons ( CC BY-SA 4.0)]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • Civicjohn Civicjohn on Nov 17, 2018

    UBER has a lot on its plate, but honestly how can they continue to support their supposed market value for an IPO next year? Yet at the same time, GM, Ford, and the like are trying to position themselves as technology companies instead of auto manufacturers. Reminds me of Spotify, which is now trading for less than the company was valued on the opening day of its IPO. They have to pay between 60-65% of top-line revenue to secure blanket licenses from the major labels. So they don’t really own anything, kind of like UBER. Don’t get me started on how much money actually goes to the content creators. Netflix, on the other hand, does own most of their content, but even they are down 20% this month. They recently did a $2 billion raise for more content. I’m not a Luddite, but I don’t think technology is always going to make a stronger bottom line.

    • Stuki Stuki on Nov 17, 2018

      " .....but honestly how can they continue to support their supposed market value for an IPO next year? " Uber's job is dreaming up unsubstantiated promises of new-new they can sell to recipients of Fed welfare. As well as to provide a place of work for those's children, which let the welfare queens brag their children are "smart." Uber's involvement in "market value" ends there. Supporting it from there on out, is the Fed's job.

  • Cognoscenti Cognoscenti on Nov 19, 2018

    This is all just the TSLA model, which as I post this comment today, is at: 361.45 USD +7.14 (up 2.02%). Keep pushing the vaporware, and those hungry for the next big win will keep paying into the scheme.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next