Battery Entrepreneur Claims Breakthrough, Reducing Need for Controversial Cobalt

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While electric vehicles get better every year, they remain beholden to battery technology. This results in a few inherent shortcomings – the most noteworthy being limited range and extended downtime while charging. While this has helped throw a wet blanket EV adoption, it isn’t the technology’s only fault. Modern car batteries are also dependent on relatively rare metals that are both morally contentious and prohibitively expensive to procure.

Cobalt, mined almost exclusively in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and often by children, is likely the worst offender. Prices skyrocketed after EV manufacturing went mainstream, and analysts have long predicted a shortage that could severely impact the long-term popularity of zero-emission vehicles. Fortunately, a new way to build batteries may be on the horizon, though this particular application could create as many issues as it solves – since it involves removing an element that’s paramount to a battery’s long-term stability.

We’ve been hearing about next-gen battery technology for years, without any giant leaps forward. It’s always “just around the corner.” Instead, energy storage has grown incrementally — always better than it was, but not as good as it could be.

Still, minimizing the need for cobalt could be a good thing. The mining industry is already nearing capacity and employing children to do an extremely dangerous job creates some unique human rights issues. We’ve previously noted that kids having dangerous jobs might be preferable to their being forced into the army, but neither option sounds ideal. By all accounts, it seems like a terrible place to grow up.

Regardless, automakers may be less dependent on them in the future. According to Bloomberg, Turkish-born, Massachusetts-based tech entrepreneur Kenan Sahin has found a way to drastically reduce cobalt requirements in nickel-based batteries. His companies, CAMX and TIAX LLC, previously developed the CAM-7 graphite lithium-ion unit that was looked upon favorably by the military and adopted by BSAF.

The new system, called GEMX, is said to be applicable in a number of nickel-based power packs and has been granted patents in the U.S., the European Union, China and Japan. Currently in Berlin for an annual auto industry conference, Sahin said he’s in talks with large manufacturers, and one has already agreed to buy a license.

“We’re hoping we will get this into the hands of the major producers,” Sahin told Bloomberg. The new formula is said to lower cobalt content to as little as 4 percent of battery cathodes, down from about 20 percent today.

Many automakers are already attempting to minimize their cobalt use; Tesla managed to reduce its own cobalt needs for the Model 3 by a large margin with help from Panasonic. Unfortunately, issues can arise when you remove cobalt from the equation — it’s needed to keep cells stable. Removing cobalt entirely would effectively ruin a battery’s life cycle, making it terrible for automotive applications.

Automakers need to units capable of maintaining 70 percent (or so) of the original charge capacity over a ten-year timespan. Without cobalt, batteries run the risk of overheating. This ups the potential fire risk, makes them less predictable in extreme climates, and drastically shortens their lifespan.

Being able to use just 4 percent cobalt would be a game changer, but it’s unclear if Sahin’s new technology would be able to go the distance with such a small amount. Tesla’s Model S employs cathodes with around 15 percent cobalt content, and most long-term storage applications are closer to 33 percent. Meanwhile, we keep hearing about manganese-based alternatives that are also on the cusp of “disrupting the industry.”

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 20 comments
  • EBFlex Garbage but for less!
  • FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
  • RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
  • Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
  • Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Next