Trademark Foreshadows Launch of GM Subscription Service 'DriveScription'


While we’ve bashed them for being one of the most expensive ways to acquire a vehicle, automotive subscription plans have becoming increasingly popular among premium nameplates. General Motors already has one exclusively for Cadillac but it appears that it’s setting up another for its less illustrious brands.
Late last month, the automaker filed a trademark application to register the name “DriveScription” with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The document clearly states that the term will be used in association with the Goods and Services categories of automotive subscription services, rental services, and vehicle sharing. Considering that Maven already handles most of the short-term rental and ride-sharing aspects of GM’s new mobility services, DriveScription is almost certain to be the mainstream equivalent to Book by Cadillac.
According to GM Authority, who first spotted the filing, the service appears to be an attempt to further normalize automotive subscription plans. While this doesn’t guarantee the service will reach daylight, it does prove that General Motors is working toward that end.
Assuming it doesn’t get lost in development, there’s no reason to expect it will operate any differently than other subscription services. The price point and vehicles on offer will differ, but you’ll still likely be paying a monthly fee to have access to a collection of models, auto insurance, and maintenance. It will also probably begin as a trial run in markets deemed receptive by the manufacturer, before being thrust upon the rest of the population.
Book by Cadillac initially launched in New York City in 2017 (prior to its expansion) and runs customers $1,800, plus a $500 activation fee, to drive any vehicle in the company’s lineup. Customers have the option to swap their vehicle free of charge for another several times per year. We imagine that DriveScription would ask for substantially less to offer unlimited access to makes like Buick or Chevrolet. It also probably won’t have a valet service that will deliver a new vehicle to a pre-agreed location. But the overall experience should be similar in nature.
Once General Motors makes an official announcement and includes a pricing breakdown, expect us to criticize it for being too expensive. However, there is a very slim chance that the company will keep pricing low enough to rationalize. One of our biggest gripes about the luxury subscription services was their lack of variety. You end up paying top dollar to have access to a fleet almost entirely comprised of SUVs and luxury cars. Mainstream brands are usually a little more diverse, offering everything from pickups and utility vans to comfortable sedans and economy cars. If GM can keep costs down, some customers might like the idea of being able to source every vehicle they’d ever need to borrow from one place.
[Image: General Motors]

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends, regulation, and the bitter-sweet nature of modern automotive tech. Research focused and gut driven.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Ernesto Perez There's a line in the movie Armageddon where Bruce Willis says " is this the best idea NASA came up with?". Don't quote me. I'm asking is this the best idea NY came up with? What's next? Charging pedestrians to walk in certain parts of the city? Every year the price for everything gets more expensive and most of the services we pay for gets worse. Obviously more money is not the solution. What we need are better ideas, strategies and inventions. You want to charge drivers in the city - then put tolls on the free bridges like the Brooklyn, Manhattan and Williamsburg bridges. There's always a better way or product. It's just the idiots on top think they know best.
- Carsofchaos The bike lanes aren't even close to carrying "more than the car lanes replaced". You clearly don't drive in Midtown Manhattan on a daily like I do.
- Carsofchaos The problem with congestion, dear friends, is not the cars per se. I drive into the city daily and the problem is this:Your average street in the area used to be 4 lanes. Now it is a bus lane, a bike lane (now you're down to two lanes), then you have delivery trucks double parking, along with the Uber and Lyft drivers also double parking. So your 4 lane avenue is now a 1.5 lane avenue. Do you now see the problem? Congestion pricing will fix none of these things....what it WILL do is fund persion plans.
- FreedMike Many F150s I encounter are autonomously driven...and by that I mean they're driving themselves because the dips**ts at the wheel are paying attention to everything else but the road.
- Tassos A "small car", TIM????????????This is the GLE. Have you even ever SEEN the huge thing at a dealer's??? NOT even the GLC,and Merc has TWO classes even SMALLER than the C (The A and the B, you guessed it? You must be a GENIUS!).THe E is a "MIDSIZED" crossover, NOT A SMALL ONE BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, oh CLUELESS one.I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THE NONSENSE you post here every god damned day.And I BET you will never even CORRECT your NONSENSE, much less APOLOGIZE for your cluelessness and unprofessionalism.
Comments
Join the conversation
Maybe GM can do an Obamacare version, where skilled and prudent drivers with perfect credit histories and living in low accident parts of the country are forced to accept "Cadillac" subscription prices that allow them to use a bare-bones menu of cars consisting of Sonics and Trax as a means of funding subsidies for accident prone drivers with poor credit histories and living in bad neighborhoods, who can then enjoy "Chevrolet" level subscription prices and access to Z-28 Camaros, ZR1 Corvettes, Escalades, twin-turbo CT-6s, etc. Why should social justice be limited to only medical care, education, and employment?
OK, moving along from those strong opening 2 posts.... The more I think about it the less I'm sold on these subscription services. Especially for GM. People's car needs don't change very frequently, and when they do it's very temporary (i.e. an Ikea run or family coming to town). GM doesn't have compelling enough lineups that anyone is getting any heartburn choosing between their offerings. I think a possibly more viable system would be a regular lease with "access" to higher end cars. So you do a 36 month Malibu lease, and for another $2000 or so you can swap it for a Corvette or Sierra Denali for like 3 months out of the lease. Just to break up the monotony and whet one's beak. But the prospect of being able to switch between an Equinox/Cruze/Impala.... just not very exciting. Same story with pretty much any mainstream brand.