Musk's Tesla U-turn Prompted by Annoyed Saudis and Fearful Fans, Despite Interest From Volkswagen: Reports

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Friday night’s not-so-surprising move by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, in which he wheeled around his plan to take the company private like an angry father cutting short a family vacation, has many angles.

First and foremost is the money factor, which matters more than anything else in this drama. According to two new reports, money eventually became available, just not from the sources we were led to expect. And not from sources Musk wanted.

According to the Wall Street Journal, green-seeking auto giant Volkswagen wanted a piece of Tesla’s action. After Musk’s team of assembled bankers rushed to put together a roster of investors last week, Volkswagen stood out among the final group. This group, it should be noted, was apparently willing to put up $30 billion in funding for the buyout.

Sources with knowledge of the dealings claim this motley crew of big players was not what Musk had hoped for. He was warned that they, and most certainly VW, would want a big say in how the automaker conducted itself. Meanwhile, many of Musk’s beloved mutual funds and small, superfan investors threatened to pull out, or at least pare their holdings.

As we all know, Musk likes having his own hand on the tiller.

While all of this was going on, Saudi Arabia was growing perturbed. The country’s sovereign wealth fund, tapped as a source of funding for Musk’s plan, is not an ATM from which anyone can just withdraw cash. According to Bloomberg, the Saudis weren’t too pleased that Musk mentioned their meetings in a public blog post.

Nor were the Saudis interested in holding a large stake in the company, sources claim, with concerns about the SEC’s investigation into Musk’s Aug. 7th tweets creating concern among the fund’s overseers. There was never a deal reached on just how much the sovereign wealth fund would contribute, the sources state.

Funding secured? Not by a long shot.

Tesla’s share price fell nearly four percent after trading opened Monday morning, but the stock has since recovered half of the loss.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 9 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Aug 27, 2018

    I wonder how much of Tesla that VW was expecting to buy with $30B - perhaps hoping for a firesale price on an unprofitable company? Not sure why VW would want Tesla anyway. Audi and Porsche are equally prestigious brands, and VW certainly has better engineering and manufacturing capability and facilities. Perhaps they want inside knowledge about how to build cars in tents?

    • See 3 previous
    • Malforus Malforus on Aug 28, 2018

      It was a total greenwash acquisition to wash the Diesel scandal from the newspapers. Obviously they wanted TESLA so they could wipe away the smog of bad press. Unfortunately it would have been hamfisted at best and I am certain the TELSA Board was unwilling to take a valuation haircut in today's climate.

  • FWD Donuts FWD Donuts on Aug 27, 2018

    Interesting photo with this article. You might think that's a baby behind the wheel. Nope. That's a 35 year old Google engineer. Somehow, the camera settings revealed the age of his mental capacity. Guess I need to look at the settings of my iPhone a little more closely.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next