From Contractor to Employee: California Ruling Poised to 'Decimate' Uber, Lyft

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
from contractor to employee california ruling poised to 8216 decimate uber lyft

An April ruling from the California Supreme Court determined that most contract workers, including those partnered with ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft, could actually qualify as employees under the state’s wage laws.

While that’s great in an era when wages can’t seem to match the constantly ascending cost of living and companies are cutting corners to maximize profits, it’s not so great for outfits that depend on contract workers to exist — like the aforementioned ride-hailing firms.

Uber and Lyft managed to balloon their revenues far beyond the billion-dollar mark, but neither company is currently profitable. Despite taking a cut of every single fare, expenses still result in a net loss for the companies during most rides. Assuming California forces them to tack on employee benefits and all the associated trimmings, both businesses could be in for a world of hurt.

Obviously, neither outfit is particularly thrilled with the idea, so they’re lobbying California Democrats to upend the court ruling. According to Bloomberg, nine businesses dependent upon the “gig economy” drafted a joint letter on July 23rd to attempt to sway California Governor Jerry Brown’s cabinet, presumed successor Gavin Newsom, and members of the state legislature.

“The magnitude of this issue requires urgent leadership,” reads the letter, suggesting the move risks “stifling innovation and threatening the livelihoods of millions of working Californians.” Co-signed by Uber Technologies, Lyft, Instacart, DoorDash, Postmates, TaskRabbit, Square, Total System Services, and Handy Technologies, the note warns that, without political intervention, the court decision will ultimately “decimate businesses.”

“If you have a business model that doesn’t lend itself to the strict structure that an employer-employee relationship dictates,” said California Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Allan Zaremberg, “[The ruling] puts you in a situation that it’s almost impossible to continue your business model … People depend very much now on an on-demand economy. In the worst-case scenario, it isn’t a viable business model anymore.”

How dire of a situation it would be for these businesses depends on on their individual business model. Still, some will have it worse than others. Uber and Lyft could simply elevate pricing to cope with new expenses. However, higher fares could result in customers leaving the platform or using it less frequently. While we don’t know the complete financial burden associated with the employment status change, California state laws entitle employees to a guaranteed minimum wage, overtime pay, protection from sexual harassment, payroll tax contributions from employers, and the chance to win collective bargaining. It sounds expensive. Considering the lobbying effort being made, it likely is.

However, labor advocates are fine with the court’s decision, claiming it as a victory for workers’ rights.

“These companies continue to have choices about their business model,” union leaders from California’s building trades, Teamsters union affiliates, and AFL-CIO chapter told Governor Brown and legislative leaders in their own letter. “They can convert workers to employees and retain control over their work rules and their rates. Or they can contract with true independent contractors. The only thing they can’t do after [the April ruling] is have their cake and eat it too.”

[Image: Jason Tester Guerrilla Futures/ Flickr ( CC BY-ND 2.0)]

Join the conversation
3 of 77 comments
  • Golden2husky Golden2husky on Aug 07, 2018

    ...We need a program like that for elderly drivers who no longer have the ability to drive safely... While your response is tongue-and cheek, this is a serious problem. As one with a 90 year old father that steadfastly refuses to give up his keys, this is a real problem. We got him full time day care to skirt around the issue. Sorry about the thread hijack.

    • Geozinger Geozinger on Aug 07, 2018

      I like the Uber idea, also. Before we took the keys (and the car) from my mother, unaware to us kids, she had developed mid-level Alzheimer's and continued to drive. She'd never been a very confident driver, so she wouldn't drive very far and get lost. Unlike some of our other relatives who would get in the car and drive three states away or until the gasoline ran out, whichever came first. We didn't even know how far she had descended into dementia until she had minor accidents (thank God!), but no real personal injury stuff or major property damage. She was very good at hiding her illness and with only one of us nearby (and he worked a lot, i.e., not around much), she managed to get away with it for quite a while. In my mother's case, we'd have to put some sort of restrictions on her ability to hail an Uber, but I think something could be worked out. Who knows, I'm in the age range to develop Alzheimer's now, maybe I should look into it, too...

  • FWD Donuts FWD Donuts on Aug 07, 2018

    Good. Those are all trash jobs, anyway. A guy got into an accident outside my place in San Jose a couple of years ago. Ran his beater Corolla into a Suburban in the middle of an intersection. He worked for some startup that delivered "warm, fresh baked cookies" to slobs to lazy to cut up a dough log and turn their oven on or grab a few chocolate chippers and toss them in the microwave. Had an illuminated sign on the roof -- it wound up 300 feet down the street. Grabbed my medical kit and ran out. The woman in the Suburban was fine. The poor guy in the Toyota was a mess. I will never forget holding the split across his face closed to slow the bleeding down. All because of some trash job. He shouldn't have been out there in the first place.

  • Art Vandelay Best? PCH from Ventura to somewhere near Lompoc. Most Famous? Route Irish
  • GT Ross The black wheel fad cannot die soon enough for me.
  • Brett Woods My 4-Runner had a manual with the 4-cylinder. It was acceptable but not really fun. I have thought before that auto with a six cylinder would have been smoother, more comfortable, and need less maintenance. Ditto my 4 banger manual Japanese pick-up. Nowhere near as nice as a GM with auto and six cylinders that I tried a bit later. Drove with a U.S. buddy who got one of the first C8s. He said he didn't even consider a manual. There was an article about how fewer than ten percent of buyers optioned a manual in the U.S. when they were available. Visited my English cousin who lived in a hilly suburb and she had a manual Range Rover and said she never even considered an automatic. That's culture for you.  Miata, Boxster, Mustang, Corvette and Camaro; I only want manual but I can see both sides of the argument for a Mustang, Camaro or Challenger. Once you get past a certain size and weight, cruising with automatic is a better dynamic. A dual clutch automatic is smoother, faster, probably more reliable, and still allows you to select and hold a gear. When you get these vehicles with a high performance envelope, dual-clutch automatic is what brings home the numbers. 
  • ToolGuy 2019 had better comments than 2023 😉
  • Inside Looking Out In June 1973, Leonid Brezhnev arrived in Washington for his second summit meeting with President Richard Nixon. Knowing of the Soviet leader’s fondness for luxury automobiles, Nixon gave him a shiny Lincoln Continental. Brezhnev was delighted with the present and insisted on taking a spin around Camp David, speeding through turns while the president nervously asked him to slow down.