Ghosn Says Slow Your Roll on the Renault-Nissan Merger, Then Confirms the Possibility
As Renault and Nissan discuss ways to strengthen their bond, Carlos Ghosn is asking everyone to slow their roll on the prospect of a merger. Despite continuously nudging the alliance in that direction, the CEO and chairman is often hesitant to discuss unification as anything more than a hypothetical. So this is par for the course.
“I don’t think you’re going to see it this year or next,” Ghosn said on Wednesday. “Lots of mergers collapse and destroy value — the strength of any company is the ability to motivate people, and how how are you going to do that if some of these people consider themselves second-class citizens.”
The second-class citizens he’s referencing are, presumably, Nissan employees seeking more influence within the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance. A large part of the group’s current strategy is to find ways to give the Japanese automaker more of a say in product development and operations.
As the more profitable automaker, Nissan feels it’s entitled to make decisions. But Renault currently has a 43.4 percent stake in Nissan, while Nissan only holds a 15 percent stake in Renault — effectively giving the French automaker corporate control.
Both Ghosn and Nissan’s CEO Hiroto Saikawa seem bent on creating a lasting relationship between their companies before their retirement, but they also seem keenly aware that the road ahead of them is fraught with peril — leaving both of them cautious when discussing a merger. However, Ghosn said he hoped to have see important decisions made that would strengthen the alliance by the end of this year.
“I don’t think there is a resistance,” Ghosn told Bloomberg in an interview. “Let’s try and find something that will reassure the stakeholders that this will continue, but at the same time maintain identity.”
He also issued a reminder that decisions take time to produce results within the industry, be it product or corporate developments. “You know our cycle, in terms of technology and product, is very long,” Ghosn said. “So what you are doing today is something that’s going to be visible three or four years down the road.”
He went on to stress that electric cars are regulator driven, which makes their future prospects a little easier to track. But automakers have to perpetually work with governments to help them understand the advanced technologies they’re requesting (but might not be particularly familiar with).
Getting back to the alliance, Ghosn noted that Nissan and Renault will experience a conversion, but stopped short of calling it full-blown merger. “We have already decided to have a common engineering, we have decided to have a common manufacturing, we have common purchasing,” he said. “This move toward more integration, toward doing more things in common, but still maintaining different brands [and] different identities you will continue to see.”
However, he’s worried about the sustainability of that model after the automakers’ current leadership retires. The top boss said a merger is one option for solving that problem, but not the only one. Ghosn explained that the ideal solution, for him, involves a drive for synergies to solidify the collaboration while allowing each brand to maintain its unique identity.
“At the end of the day, you need people who are proud of their brand going and fighting in all the markets,” he said. “But, at the same time, you don’t want duplication. You develop one technology, one platform, we buy together. Everything that the consumer doesn’t really care for should be done in common for the sake of efficiency and for the sake of [the price of our cars].”
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Ollicat I have a Spyder. The belt will last for many years or 60,000-80,000 miles. Not really a worry.
- Redapple2 Cadillac and racing. Boy those 2 go together dont they? What a joke. Up there with opening a coffee shop in NYC. EvilGM be clowning. Again.
- Jbltg Rear bench seat does not match the front buckets. What's up?
- Theflyersfan The two Louisville truck plants are still operating, but not sure for how much longer. I have a couple of friends who work at a manufacturing company in town that makes cooling systems for the trucks built here. And they are on pins and needles wondering if or when they get the call to not go back to work because there are no trucks being made. That's what drives me up the wall with these strikes. The auto workers still get a minimum amount of pay even while striking, but the massive support staff that builds components, staffs temp workers, runs the logistics, etc, ends up with nothing except the bare hope that the state's crippled unemployment system can help them keep afloat. In a city where shipping (UPS central hub and they almost went on strike on August 1) and heavy manufacturing (GE Appliance Park and the Ford plants) keeps tens of thousands of people employed, plus the support companies, any prolonged shutdown is a total disaster for the city as well. UAW members - you're not getting a 38% raise right away. That just doesn't happen. Start a little lower and end this. And then you can fight the good fight against the corner office staff who make millions for being in meetings all day.
- Dusterdude The "fire them all" is looking a little less unreasonable the longer the union sticks to the totally ridiculous demands ( or maybe the members should fire theit leadership ! )