NHTSA Investigates Why Kia, Hyundai Airbags Didn't Deploy in Fatal Crashes

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened a probe into two older-model Kia and Hyundai vehicles in the wake of six head-on collisions, hoping to discover why the vehicles’ airbags failed to deploy.

Included in the investigation is the 2011 Hyundai Sonata and Kia Fortes from the 2012 and 2013 model years. The collisions reported by the safety agency resulted in four deaths and six injuries.

According to the NHTSA, each collision caused significant damage to the vehicle, and should have led to front airbag deployment. This didn’t happen. The agency received the accident reports between 2012 and 2017.

Four of the collisions occurred in 2011 Sonatas sold in the United States, with a 2012 Forte and Canadian-market 2013 model rounding out the group. Naturally, part of the agency’s probe will determine whether airbags in other models might be affected. Some 425,000 vehicles currently fall under the NHTSA probe.

Speaking to Reuters, Hyundai brand spokesman Jim Trainor said the automaker is aware of two fatalities, adding that the head-on collisions occurred at a high rate of speed. The problem seems to exist only in 2011 Sonatas, he said.

Last month, Hyundai issued a recall for 154,753 Sonatas in the U.S. after receiving reports of airbag non-deployment.

“Hyundai indicates that the DIR stemmed from post-collision inspections of the air bag control units (ACUs) showing that an electrical overstress condition (EOS) of an ACU electronic component occurred in three of the crashes, and that the fourth ACU is under evaluation for the same concern,” the NHTSA said in its investigation summary. “Hyundai has not identified a remedy for this recall, and states that the cause of the EOS is being investigated with the ACU supplier, ZF-TRW.”

It’s believed the Forte models are equipped with the same ACUs.

[Image: Hyundai]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 24 comments
  • GeneralMalaise GeneralMalaise on Mar 18, 2018

    Wait a minute now... I thought the Koreans were the NKOTB as far as quality and hitting the mark on what consumers want in a car. You mean buyers want to survive crashes too? Back to the drawing board...

  • IBx1 IBx1 on Mar 19, 2018

    At least that great warranty will replace the airbags. A long warranty makes a car reliable, right?

    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Mar 19, 2018

      A long warranty generally means that the owner is saved from out-of-pocket expenses for the duration of the warranty, if all maintenance and warranty requirements for that warranty are met. In the case of the airbags, federal mandates re passenger safety will force the OEM to replace the airbags even if the car is out of warranty.

  • 28-Cars-Later I'm getting a Knight Rider vibe... or is it more Knightboat?
  • 28-Cars-Later "the person would likely be involved in taking the Corvette to the next level with full electrification."Chevrolet sold 37,224 C8s in 2023 starting at $65,895 in North America (no word on other regions) while Porsche sold 40,629 Taycans worldwide starting at $99,400. I imagine per unit Porsche/VAG profit at $100K+ but was far as R&D payback and other sunk costs I cannot say. I remember reading the new C8 platform was designed for hybrids (or something to that effect) so I expect Chevrolet to experiment with different model types but I don't expect Corvette to become the Taycan. If that is the expectation, I think it will ride off into the sunset because GM is that incompetent/impotent. Additional: In ten years outside of wrecks I expect a majority of C8s to still be running and economically roadworthy, I do not expect that of Taycans.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
  • ChristianWimmer My girlfriend has a BMW i3S. She has no garage. Her car parks on the street in front of her apartment throughout the year. The closest charging station in her neighborhood is about 1 kilometer away. She has no EV-charging at work.When her charge is low and she’s on the way home, she will visit that closest 1 km away charger (which can charge two cars) , park her car there (if it’s not occupied) and then she has two hours time to charge her car before she is by law required to move. After hooking up her car to the charger, she has to walk that 1 km home and go back in 2 hours. It’s not practical for sure and she does find it annoying.Her daily trip to work is about 8 km. The 225 km range of her BMW i3S will last her for a week or two and that’s fine for her. I would never be able to handle this “stress”. I prefer pulling up to a gas station, spend barely 2 minutes filling up my small 53 liter fuel tank, pay for the gas and then manage almost 720 km range in my 25-35% thermal efficient internal combustion engine vehicle.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Here in North Korea we are lucky to have any tires.
Next