North American Skies Will Be Filled With Flying Cars in 10 Years: Uber CEO

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here
north american skies will be filled with flying cars in 10 years uber ceo

Uber Technologies Inc.’s chief executive, Dara Khosrowshahi, predicts a nearish future where civilians whiz around in sky-bound automobiles.

“There will be people flying around Dallas, Texas,” Khosrowshahi said at the Digital Life Design conference in Munich, his first work-related appearance in Europe since taking over as Uber’s CEO last year. “I think it’s going to happen within the next ten years.”

Considering we’ve been waiting on flying cars for roughly 100 years, what’s another decade?

We’re kidding, of course. Anyone with a modicum of common sense understands that mass-produced floating automobiles are pure fantasy. Work on such vehicles hasn’t really progressed all that swiftly and there’s been no breakthroughs in the technology, either. The best anyone seems to be able to do is build massive drones ( which crash) or automobiles that can be converted into airplanes.

Does that make Khosrowshahi a bearded liar?

Since the Bloomberg article doesn’t elaborate further on his claim and Uber isn’t ready to detail its flying car strategy, it’s difficult to say (but he does have a beard). As a CEO, Khosrowshahi will probably make a lot of outrageous claims illustrating the role his company will play in a hypothetical futuristic utopia — exciting investors with total nonsense is a big part of the job.

However, we’d argue that anyone focusing seriously on air-based vehicles that will ultimately replace the automobile is a bit of a crackpot. Automakers have had numerous opportunities to slap a set of tires on a helicopter, but nobody has bothered with it. Flying cars aren’t a thing, and they definitely aren’t “going to happen within the next ten years.” Fully autonomous cars may not even be 10 years away — and even if they are, they won’t be ubiquitous by then.

The company does have sky-high aspirations, though. Last year, Uber partnered with NASA to develop novel traffic concepts that could be used for robotic flight systems. By working with aircraft, infrastructure and real estate partners, Uber thinks it can undercut traditional aircraft companies by setting up a high-speed flight network with fixed routes between major hubs. The company is called “uberAir” and would work exactly like Uber only with fixed pickup and drop-off points conducive to flying.

The company has also hinted at using flying drones as part of the food-delivery service Uber Eats. As a sack of hamburgers is lighter and less important than a human being, the company incurs less risk when it falls from the sky and explodes all over the pavement. Likewise, getting an email saying your food failed to arrive is easier to cope with than “your wife could not be delivered due to technical limitations of our new service.”

So far as we know, Uber isn’t planning on flying people anywhere using small delivery drones — but it did push Uber Elevate last fall. Elevate was a hypothetical side business that sounds exactly like uberAir. In fact, head of product Jeff Holden actually said the aerial taxi service would start in Dallas by 2020. But these aren’t exactly flying cars, as Khosrowshahi suggested, they’re helicopters that Uber says should also probably be electric and autonomous.

Even without a working prototype of the vehicle, Holden claims Uber’s Elevate/Air program is just around the corner.

“There’s been a great deal of progress that’s been hard to see from the outside, because a lot of this is just hard work at the drafting table,” he said in a 2017 interview with The Verge. “We feel really good. It’s been a really interesting process getting our vehicle manufacturing partners aligned on performance specifications, so that they’re building vehicles that align with what we need to make Elevate successful. So lots of good progress there.”

That’s a relief, as we were starting to think this was all made-up bullshit designed to make the company look good.

[Image: Uber Technologies Inc.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends, regulation, and the bitter-sweet nature of modern automotive tech. Research focused and gut driven.

More by Matt Posky

Join the conversation
2 of 59 comments
  • ToolGuy I appreciate the thoughtful comments from the little people here, and I would like to remind everyone that Ford Motor Company offers a full range of vehicles which are ideal for any driving environment including New York City. The size and weight our of product portfolio has been fully and completely optimized to be friendly to the planet and friendly to pedestrians while consuming the bare minimum of resources from our precious planet (I am of course a lifelong environmentalist). Plus, our performance models will help you move forward and upward by conquering obstacles and limits such as congestion and your fellow humans more quickly at a higher rate of speed. I invite you to learn more at our website.Signed, William Clay Ford Jr.
  • George Hughes What ever happened to the American can-do attitude. I know what, it was coopted by the fossil fuel industry in their effort to protect their racket.
  • 28-Cars-Later "But Assemblyman Phil Ting, the San Franciscan Democrat who wrote the electric school bus legislation, says this is all about the health and wellbeing of Golden State residents. In addition to the normal air pollution stemming from exhaust gasses, he believes children are being exposed to additional carcinogens by just being on a diesel bus."Phil is into real estate, he doesn't know jack sh!t about science or medicine and if media were real it would politely remind him his opinions are not qualified... if it were real. Another question if media were real is why is a very experienced real estate advisor and former tax assessor writing legislation on school busses? If you read the rest of his bio after 2014, his expertise seems to be applied but he gets into more and more things he's not qualified to speak to or legislate on - this isn't to say he isn't capable of doing more but just two years ago Communism™ kept reminding me Dr. Fauxi knew more about medicine than I did and I should die or something. So Uncle Phil just gets a pass with his unqualified opinions?Ting began his career as a real estate  financial adviser at  Arthur Andersen and  CBRE. He also previously served as the executive director of the  Asian Law Caucus, as the president of the Bay Area Assessors Association, and on the board of  Equality California. [url=][1][/url][h3][/h3]In 2005, Ting was appointed San Francisco Assessor-Recorder in 2005 by Mayor  Gavin Newsom, becoming San Francisco’s highest-ranking  Chinese-American official at the time. He was then elected to the post in November 2005, garnering 58 percent of the vote.Ting was re-elected Assessor-Recorder in 2006 and 2010During his first term in the Assembly, Ting authored a law that helped set into motion the transformation of Piers 30-32 into what would become  Chase Center the home of the  Golden State Warriors
  • RHD This looks like a lead balloon. You could buy a fantastic classic car for a hundred grand, or a Mercedes depreciationmobile. There isn't much reason to consider this over many other excellent vehicles that cost less. It's probably fast, but nothing else about it is in the least bit outstanding, except for the balance owed on the financing.
  • Jeff A bread van worthy of praise by Tassos.