Ask Jack: Tryin' to Love Two
John Le Carre’s superb A Perfect Spy opens with a curious quote, attributed to “Proverb”:
A man who has two women loses his soul. But a man who has two houses loses his head.
I’m not so sure about the first part of that. The virtue of dating two (or more) women is that you don’t expect that any one of them will fulfill all your requirements, which prevents you from becoming overly demanding or difficult with them. As to the second part, all I can tell you is that when I’ve owned rental property I’ve found it to be more hassle than it was worth. I suspect the original author of the proverb was not talking about that situation. Nor was he referring to our blessed above-one-percent crowd who frequently own domiciles on both coasts, or vacation homes in sunny spots. Rather, he probably meant that a man who operates two separate families will lose his mind. This sort of thing was more common in the days before Equifax and cell phones, mind you.
The question becomes: Is owning two cars like loving two women, which is often a good thing, or is it like maintaining two households, which is almost always a bad thing? Before we fall back on the truthful but unsatisfying “it depends,” let’s consider today’s questioner and see if we can’t keep him in sound possession of both soul and head.
I drive a lot. I live 35 miles from my place of employment and split commuting between a three-banger, 70 mpg Honda Insight and a loaded Charger R/T currently on Yoko IceGuards. My son may get deep into karting, and I race in my spare time, which means I will eventually find a 24-foot trailer and a race car or two in my life.
As I get older, the Insight’s lack of safety is starting to bother me. I’m thinking about reshuffling cars, as I may need a tow vehicle, and am considering an Accord 2.0T 6MT (as I really liked my ’14 Accord Sport 6MT). Or a Civic Si. For a tow pig, I’ve had a soft spot for Ford 300 inline-sixes and you can still find them in decent F-150s roaming around here.
But old trucks require a lot of work and I wouldn’t want to wreck one. Do I split the difference and get a new-ish work truck and a cheap-ish sedan? Or a really nice truck and see if I can find an old Miata? The race car goes on the race track so I wouldn’t be ‘tracking’ anything. Total budget is $40-50k, and I would like something that isn’t a truck to handle daily commuting.
Knowing Nick’s situation personally, I’d start by advising that he not plan too much around the idea of a future 24′ trailer and/or race car. Right now he’s doing enduros, and with an enduro team it almost always makes sense to rent a truck and/or trailer because you can split the expense a few ways. It’s not until you are pulling your own car to weekend after weekend — or pulling your son’s kart plus a complete toolset and kart stand — that the self-owned truck/trailer starts to make sense.
Let’s put that aside for now, though, and move to the second part of the question, which concerns the appropriate divvying-up of between forty and fifty thousand dollars between truck and car. This is the sort of hypothetical situation which gets a lot of play on the kiddie-oriented forums and always ends up with a bunch of people suggesting the unbeatable combination of perfectly-restored Grand Wagoneer and V8-swapped Miata. The problem with that combination, and similar make-believe fantasy exercises, is that it’s not terribly compatible with reality.
The real world has a few immutable laws. One of them concerns resale value. Some vehicles retain value well; you should buy those new if you can afford them. Some vehicles retain value poorly; you should buy those used, if you can deal with the hassle.
In $THE_CURRENT_YEAR, we see that pickups retain their value absurdly well, while sedans and (most) sports cars do not. This suggests the combination of a new pickup and a used car, regardless of one’s fondness for the 300-cubic-inch straight-six that disappeared with the arrival of the “aero” F-150 in 1997 and the discontinuation of the “F-150 Classic” later on in that year. Only a loon would tow a race car with a 20-year-old truck, and only an extremely optimistic person would put his young son in one for a freeway trip. I say this with some self-awareness because, for quite some time, my race team used a 1995 F-350 with a PowerStroke for towing purposes. It ended as badly as you might imagine, hundreds of miles away from home.
It’s been pretty well established that $40,000 will get you a well-equipped half-ton crew cab with a reasonable level of equipment. Which crew cab would be up to Nick; I’d personally want to see that 2019 Ram on the road before I spent my money. That leaves between $0 and $10,000 for the car. You can get a lot of Miata for ten grand, you can get a lot of used Mustang for ten grand, you can get a lot of W-body Impala for ten grand. There are plenty of deals to be had at pretty much all levels of the marketplace above the buy-here-pay-here fodder.
The best part is that owning a brand-new, completely reliable truck relaxes some of the requirements for that second car. If you want to try something that’s unreliable but relatively safe, like a W210 Benz, you could do that, secure in the knowledge that you could always tow it home on a U-Haul with your truck and then drive said truck until you get around to fixing it. It could be a labor-of-love type car like a 1.8T-powered Volkswagen or Subaru Impreza 2.5RS. Last but not least, we could add a third vehicle into the mix, spending six grand on a recent Hyundai Accent “or similar” and four grand on a motorcycle. Having one completely reliable vehicle in the stable gives you options.
That’s my generic advice. If I had to spend the money myself, I’d do a Ford F-150 XLT 2.7 Ecoboost for the truck and… hmm… a New Edge Mustang Cobra for eight grand… and a Yamaha FZ-1 like the one my pal Sidney and I own together for two grand. That’s a fairly aggressive lineup that should have a little something for everyone. In the end, however, this is one of those infamous “80/20” situations. Get the 80 percent correct with a brand-new truck, and you can afford to be lackadaisical about the other 20.
I truly believe that, heart and head.
More by Jack Baruth
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Mia Hey there!I recently stumbled upon the Crack Eraser DIY Windshield Repair Kit (check it out here: https://crackeraser.com/collections/diy-windshield-repair-kits) and decided to give it a shot on a small chip in my windshield. I have to say, it worked like a charm! Super easy to use, and it saved me a trip to the professionals. If you're dealing with a similar issue, this kit is definitely worth considering. 😊
- Rust-MyEnemy Whoa, what the hell is wrong with Jalop1991 and his condescension? It's as if he's employed by Big Plug-In or something."I've seen plenty of your types on the forums....."Dunno what that means, but I'm not dead keen on being regarded as "A type" by a complete stranger"" I'm guessing you've never actually calculated by hand the miles you've driven against the quantity of gas used--which is your actual miles per gallon."Guess again. Why the hell would you even say that? Yes, I worked it out. Fill-to-fill, based on gas station receipts. And it showed me that a Vauxhall Astra PHEV, starting out with a fully charged PHEV battery, in Hybrid mode, on my long (234-mile) daily motorway daily commute, never, over several months, ever matched or beat the economy of the regular hybrid Honda Civic that I ran for a similar amount of time (circa 5000 miles)."You don't use gasoline at all for 30-40 miles as you use exclusively battery power, then your vehicle is a pure hybrid. Over 234 miles, you will have used whatever gas the engine used for 200 of those miles."At least you're right on that. In hybrid mode, though, the Astra was using battery power when it wasn't at all appropriate. The petrol engine very rarely chimed in when battery power was on tap, and as a result, the EV-mode range quickly disappeared. The regular hybrid Civic, though, deployed its very small electric reserves (which are used up quickly but restore themselves promptly), much more wisely. Such as when on a trailing throttle or on a downward grade, or when in stop-start traffic. As a result, at the end of my 234 miles, the Civic had used less gas than the Astra. Moreover, I hadn't had to pay for the electricity in its battery.I look forward to you arguing that what actually happened isn't what actually happened, but I was there and you were not."Regardless, that you don't understand it appears not to have stopped you from pontificating on it. Please, do us all a favor--don't vote."You really are quite unpleasant, aren't you. But thanks for the advice.
- Tassos Jong-iL Electric vehicles are mandated by 2020 in One Korea. We are ahead of the time.
- 1995_SC Can you still get some of the tax credits under the new program?
- Analoggrotto HyundaiGenesisKia saw this coming a long time ago and are poised for hybrid and plug-in hybrid segment leadership:[list=1][*] The most extensive range of hybrids[/*][*]Highest hybrid sales proportion over any other model [/*][*]Best YouTube reviews [/*][*]Highest number of consumer reports best picks [/*][*]Class leading ATPs among all hybrid vehicles and PHEVs enjoy segment bearing eATPs[/*][/list=1]While some brands like Toyota have invested and wasted untold fortunes into full range electric lineups HyundaiKiaGenesis has taken the right approach here.