Toyota Losing Sanity Over the Automotive Industry's Uncertain Future

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Toyota Motor Corp. is shuffling its management team because it’s worried about the automotive industry’s uncertain future. The changes, announced this week in Tokyo, take effect at the start of the new year. Toyota wants to diversify its corporate leadership in order to handle the changing shape of car building and the growing role of “mobility.”

However, an argument can be made that the company might be browning its pants prematurely. While the current nature of the automotive industry appears to be evolving into something else, it won’t happen overnight. Still, company president Akio Toyoda talks of the shifting winds as if someone has placed a gun to his head.

“Over the next 100 years, there is no guarantee that automobile manufacturers will continue to play leading roles in mobility,” Toyoda explained. “A crucial battle has begun — not one about winning or losing, but one about surviving or dying.”

“We will pursue alliances with other companies and other industries,” he continued. “But, before that, it is essential that we concentrate the capabilities of the Toyota Group. Our coming structural change reflects our will that the Toyota Group will tackle this era of profound transformation. This change includes the appointment of people with high levels of expertise, regardless of time with the company or age and from the perspective of having the right people in the right places.”

According to a Toyota press release, those all-important changes include more people from outside the company, a female executive at Lexus, additional non-Japanese executives, and executives with backgrounds in technical positions. The business also intends to renew the roles of executive vice presidents and establish the new post of “fellow” — which is reserved for executives with a high level of expertise.

Presumably, the intent is to get management more involved in the daily goings-on.

Toyota also plans to restructure its business planning and operation divisions rather extensively, especially in regard to how it handles regional activities. The goal here is to become more sensitive to specific regions’ needs while simultaneously remaining fluid and flexible — which sounds like a pretty tall order. If done incorrectly, this could create an inefficient bureaucratic nightmare.

The list of title changes is extensive, and not filled with quite so many “outsiders” as one might imagine. But the sun is only just beginning to rise over Toyota’s “next 100 years,” so we’d imagine more managerial changes are forthcoming. At the top of the pack, vice-chairman of Denso Koji Kobayashi will become Toyota’s CFO and executive vice president — as will Toyota senior managing officers Shigeki Tomoyama and Moritaka Yoshida. Gill A. Pratt, CEO of Toyota’s Research Institute, will become the company’s first “fellow” in the advanced R&D and engineering division.

Additional changes to management are considerable and often include expanding employee duties or condensing them into a single role. They also often serve to strengthen corporate ties between various Toyota Group companies, like Denso or Toyota Tsusho. If you’re interested in a complete breakdown of the restructuring, it’s available at Toyota’s corporate website. All in, the list includes 56 promotions and 121 individually named transfers.

“This is an era in which the correct answers are unknown,” said Toyoda. “Knowing that the customer comes first, we need to have people who understand the workplace well enough to lead with quick judgment, quick decisions and quick action through genchi genbutsu (on-site learning and problem-solving) as they see fit in response to all kinds of situations. To create forms of mobility to which people can feel intimately connected, and to be able to provide the freedom and joy of mobility to all people, everyone working for Toyota will unite in spirit and continuously take up new challenges.”

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • ClutchW100 ClutchW100 on Nov 29, 2017

    Who know what we will imagine in 20 years?

  • White Shadow White Shadow on Mar 12, 2018

    My brother has a fairly high executive level position with Mercedes Benz and we were just talking about this the other day. According to him, MB is plenty worried about the future of the automobile and vehicle ownership in the future. Every car manufacturer has to be forward thinking and project sales for the foreseeable future. If they believe they will continue on a downward trend, steps should be taken now to ensure the future of the company. Just ask Kodak.

  • V8fairy Bought a 1981 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham in 1995 with some of the proceeds of selling the house I'd bought with my first ex. I still have it today, so that makes it 31 years. Was my daily for ten years or so. It has become a classic. Also have a 2001 Holden Commodore V8 wagon I bought about 12 years ago which is my current daily driver (although I cycle most of my short trips under 20 km or so). That is now well on its way to classic status so I'm keeping it
  • SCE to AUX Yes, of course it mattered, but it had the greater effect on lower-priced EVs.I used it twice (2012 and 2019) on leased EVs priced at $38k and $30k respectively. I would not have bought them otherwise. The buyout on the 19 was advantageous and the car is/was excellent, so I still have it. Since they were leases, the $7500 came off at purchase - not on my taxes. I have no idea if I would have qualified that way.However, today the EV market is much different - more choice, better vehicles, better values, better charging, and pricing undistorted by the Federal government.EV prices have come way down in the last 6 months, but the reasons are varied.[list=1][*]Some turds won't sell because they're terrible EVs (Charger Daytona EV, ID Buzz)[/*][*]Some EVs are overpriced to begin with (all electric trucks, all BMWs)[/*][*]Some mfrs are trying to maintain market share (Tesla, Hyundai)[/*][*]Some EVs are actually getting cheaper to build (Rivian R2, Model Y)[/*][/list=1]I still want my next car to be electric, and it will be nice to shop without the wacky subsidy rules that 46 put into place. The prior rule was simpler, and had expired for Tesla and GM by the time 46 reinstated a complex version. If the old rule had stayed in place, Hyundai and Ford would also have eventually become exempt, and very few subsidies would have been provided anymore.
  • Slavuta rooting for both teams
  • Lou_BC The Chinese are looking at building a plant in Canada. The can set up shop there.
  • Slavuta Not as bad as replacing a small block
Next