Rare Rides: A Lancia Scorpion From 1976, Regulation's Puppet
A pleasantly desinged Pininfarina body carves its way up the Amalfi coast in Italy. The sun shines down through the targa roof, highlighting your gold-rimmed aviators. Dropping a gear, you put all 120 mid-engine horsepower to use. The back of your car says MONTECARLO, and you’re winning.
But things in reality are a bit different, because this is America and we have regulations. I give you the Scorpion, by Lancia.
North America received Lancia’s Montecarlo model badged as the Scorpion, for 1976 and 1977. The Scorpion name was only for North America, as Lancia could not tread upon Chevrolet’s existing use for their [s]small and sporty[/s] gigantic coupe.
American emission regulations required replacement of the standard Montecarlo’s 2.0-liter engine with a 1.8-liter unit, which featured additional power-choking smog equipment. This combination resulted in an 80-horsepower power figure, down from the 120 in other-market models.
Exterior alterations were required for the US market, including big rubber impact bumpers.
There were also some sort of pop-up lamps.
All examples for North America featured a retractable targa roof, which surely remains water tight in all examples.
The interior of the Scorpion is in the style of “modern” late ’70s car design, with blocky shapes and angles that don’t make a lot of sense.
A rather unsuccessful run saw just 1,801 total examples of the Scorpion on the streets.
Though it remained a blip on the radar in the North American market, the Montecarlo would go on to a second generation elsewhere in the world. This second generation would form the basis for one of Lancia’s most important vehicles: the 037, which won the 1983 World Rally Championship.
This particular Scorpion was on eBay recently, listed as a fixer-upper. Though the original owner put 124,000 miles on the odometer between 1976 and 1983, there were 18 years of neglect afterward. The present owner had been slowly restoring the Scorpion since 2001 before life changes forced a sale.
A lucky buyer spent $5,100 on our regulatory Rare Ride.
[Images via eBay]
H/t to commenter TMA1, who pointed out a Scorpion listing a while back.
Packard on Nov 09, 2017
The Rest of the Story- 1976 Scorpion. Having owned a Scorpion and two Beta coupes I thought I would add some information. The 1976 Scorpion was Road and Track's 1976 car of the year. Its list price was almost $15K. (1976 Porsche would have been a better buy.) I bought my Scorpion in 1983. It needed a little work but was a very good car which I owed for 18 years. These cars were mostly hand made. For example, the driver's door latch was installed with six shims. In general body integrity and gaps were good. The interior was less polished and was not equal to the rest of the car. The canvas roof worked well and did not leak. The big con of this car was lack of power. With emission controls it had 86 hp. Most owners made modifications- 1) remove cat. converter (this was the type with a "Slow Down" warning light); 2) install larger carb.; and 3) install new camshafts. With improvements the car still had under 100 hp but any additional power was an improvement. Some owners later installed the 2000cc Fiat/Lancia engine with Bosch fuel injection- this was 120 hp. This would probably be a big improvement. The Scorpion drove very well and except for the lack of power was a good dependable car which I drove almost every day.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- MaintenanceCosts We hear endlessly from the usual suspects about the scenarios where EVs don't work as well as gas cars. We never hear the opposite side of the coin. From an EV owner (since 2019) who has a second EV reserved, here are a few points the "I road trip 1000 miles every day" crowd won't tell you about:[list][*]When you have a convenient charging situation, EV fueling is more convenient than a gas car. There is no stopping at gas stations and you start every day with a full tank.[/*][*]Where there are no-idling rules (school pickup/dropoff, lines for ferries or services, city loading, whatever else) you can keep warm or cool to your heart's content in your EV.[/*][*]In the cold, EVs will give you heat from the second you turn them on.[/*][*]EVs don't care one bit if you use them for tons of very short trips. Their mechanicals don't need to boil off condensation. (Just tonight, I used my EV to drive six blocks, because it was 31 degrees and raining, and walking would have been unpleasant.)[/*][*]EVs don't stink and don't make you breathe carcinogens on cold start.[/*][*]EV maintenance is much less frequent and much cheaper, eliminating almost all items having to do with engine, transmission, or brakes in a gas car. In most EVs the maintenance schedule consists of battery coolant changes and tire maintenance.[/*][*]You can accelerate fast in EVs without noisily attracting the attention of the cops and every passerby on the street.[/*][/list]
- MaintenanceCosts Still can't get a RAV4 Prime for love or money. Availability of normal hybrid RAV4s and Highlanders is only slightly better. At least around here I think Toyota could sell twice the number of vehicles that they are actually bringing in at the moment.
- Tree Trunk Been in the market for a new Highlander Hybrid, it is sold out with order time of 6 months plus. Probably would have bit the bullet if it was not for the dealers the refuse to take an order but instead want to sell from allotment whether it fits or not and at thousands over MRSP.
- AKHusky The expense argument is nonsense. My mach e was $42k after tax credit. Basically the same as similarly equipped edge. And it completely ignores that the best selling vehicles are Rams, F150s, and Silverados, all more expensive that a bolt, MAch e or ID4. As an owner, I'd say they are still in second car territory for most places in the country.
- Johnster I live in a red state and I see quite a few EVs being purchased by conservative, upper-class Republicans (many of them Trump-supporters). I suspect that it is a way for them to flaunt their wealth and that, over time, the preference for EVs will trickle down to less well-off Republicans.