Ace of Base: 2018 Honda Ridgeline RT 2WD

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy
ace of base 2018 honda ridgeline rt 2wd

Most readers are well aware of my infatuation with trucks. Blame my rural upbringing, or chalk it up to the innate Canadian friendliness of helping everyone move house, but a pickup truck will always reside in my driveway.

The Honda Ridgeline, newly designed for the 2017 model year, is available in a range of trims, starting with the RT at $29,630. This author was unsure about the Ridgeline’s practicality as a truck when it was introduced, given its lineage. Can a base Honda pickup pass the Ace of Base test?

I have been known to look unfairly upon the Honda Ridgeline, with its unibody construction and decidedly un-muscular roots, with approximately the same amount of distain one would hold for a soiled copy of the National Inquirer. A transverse V6 and a front-drive chassis did not a truck make, I thought.

This was the wrong approach, as most Ridgeline customers care not one whit about such trivialities and are drawn in by the “H” on the grille after a lifetime of Accord or CR-V ownership. Chiseled looks and the ability to stand out in the school drop-off queue are the killer apps for many. The bed in the back is just a bonus. It is hard to find fault with their line of logic.

Under the hood is a 280 horsepower, direct-injected, 3.5-liter V6 that’s the same across the board, no matter the level of trim. Two-wheel-drive Ridgelines, like our base RT, deploy a high-capacity radiator in a bid to boast a 3,500-pound towing capacity. This is about the same as most crossovers and more than enough to haul a utility trailer filled with yard detritus or even tow a small hard-sided camper.

You can smack well over 1000 lbs in the bed, or haul 3,500 lbs worth of gear. My biggest gripe with the Ridgeline is the location of its spare wheel; housed in the in-bed trunk. I challenge anyone who is exercising that payload capacity with a load of gravel to access the hatch containing the spare. Same thing when the bed is full of snow and ice, as it is five months of the year in these climes.

However, as someone was quite correct to point out on the last occasion I groused about this particular design decision, most Ridgeline owners, finding themselves riding on only three inflated tires, will simply call roadside assistance. This is a good point, although this does not help folks who find themselves in possession of an out-of-warranty Honda pickup. Trucks are generally kept working on the road long after their passenger car brethren have been unceremoniously fed into The Crusher, after all.

I do understand why someone would buy a Ridgeline, but only as a quirky alternative to the Pilot and not as a serious truck. That market does exist, though it is shrinking: sales have been hovering around the 2,700 units/month mark since June, down from over 4,000 last December.

However, mine is not to reason why; mine is to give it an Ace of Base try. The base RT trim, offering only two dour colors and bereft of a meaningful infotainment system, is a tough sell. Economies of scale ensure features like cruise control, power windows, and air conditioning are present, as is a truckish Class III trailer hitch and seven-pin electrical connector.

I’d want to make the walk to up at least the RTL-T trim and enjoy all its amenities for $36,080. The most F-150 one can get for that price is a 3.3-liter-equipped 4×2 XL Crew Cab with the Chrome Appearance package and Group 101A. It won’t be nearly as laden with features, but it will tow 5,000 lbs.

Not that anyone is cross-shopping those two machines, of course. An XL-trim Ford truck won’t impress in the drop-off lane nearly as much as a high-spec Ridgeline.

[Image: Honda]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selection.

The model above is shown in American dollars with American options and trim, absent of destination charges and available rebates. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Join the conversation
2 of 79 comments
  • Ajla Ajla on Nov 15, 2017

    If I buy a truck it better treat the roads like Sasha Grey and make me feel like I have an 11 inch wang.

  • Gltff Gltff on Nov 16, 2017

    I own a 2017 RTL-T Ridgeline and it's the perfect truck for me. We are dedicated DIY landscapers and the Ridgeline is just fine for hauling dirt, gravel, mulch, pine straw, lumber, etc. I sold my 2008 Tacoma when I purchased the Honda and haven't missed the Toyota at all. Another plus for the Ridgeline is the comfort level on trips. All of our grandchildren live in other states, the nearest being three hours away, and the Ridgeline is very nice on long drives. Also, on those trips it gets 29 MPG. I'm very happy with this truck and would but another.

  • ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
  • ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
  • Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
  • Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
  • ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂