QOTD: Will Cadillac and Lincoln Regain Top-Tier Luxury Brand Status In Your Lifetime?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Cadillac enjoys some of the highest average transaction prices among premium auto brands operating in the United States. After years of Lincoln MKS disappointment, the new Lincoln Continental actually looks the part. Globally, Cadillac sales are rising month after month after month. In the U.S., Lincoln is rare among auto brands in a declining auto industry in 2017: sales at Ford’s upmarket brand have risen 3 percent this year.

Indeed, while discussing the apparent appeal of the Tesla brand last week, Jack Baruth said, “You might say that General Motors and Ford are going to build better, more reliable, and more thoroughly developed electric cars than Tesla can, and you’re probably right.”

“But the world doesn’t want an electric Cadillac or Lincoln,” Jack accurately points out, “for the same reasons it doesn’t want gasoline-powered Cadillacs or Lincolns.”

Regardless of how you grade the momentum of Cadillac and Lincoln, they are mere blips in the global luxury automobile market and remain rather inconsequential players in their U.S. home market, as well. Will that change in your lifetime?

Ever notice how the 20 compliments your spouse paid you over the last week are cancelled out by the one cutting remark on a Monday morning on your way out to work? In a moment of Monday maturity, you’re able to overlook the sharp insult, but it stays with you far longer than any positive comment.

Cadillac and Lincoln had their fair share of outstanding vehicles, from the ’46 Sixty Special and the ’57 DeVille to the ’37 Zephyr and ’61 Continental convertible. They were symbols of success, emblems of elegant excess, cars of a high caliber.

The mystique of domestic luxury was lost, however, not only by one harsh barb but by successive generations of Cadillacs and Lincolns that failed to compete with a European and then Japanese incursion.

Cadillacs that displayed the proper on-road behavior lacked the requisite premium interiors. Lincolns that possessed proper exterior treatment failed to measure up to expected reliability standards. Cadillacs that produced Nürburgring-mastering performance looked comically edgy. Lincolns failed to convince buyers that luxurious equipment levels counteracted obvious connections with regular Blue Oval machinery.

Cadillac and Lincoln are both building better cars, arguably perfectly competitive cars, evidently eye-catching cars. But does it matter?

Not now, not yet. Cadillac and Lincoln can’t undo the damage of decades in short order. In the minds of consumers in the duo’s own home market, the obvious premium vehicle choices reside in the showrooms of Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, BMW, and Audi. Cadillac and Lincoln simply don’t provide the same status.

Will they ever?

[Images: General Motors, Ford Motor Company]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 150 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Oct 22, 2017

    Never say never. Thing with Germans is that despite their obvious superiority in the end they have some real fatal flaw that undoes them. German army and weapons were considered superior and unstoppable. We all know how that ended. Japan also was expected to take over world just like China today and where are they now? Most of 2000s I worked on developing midware for mobile phones. Early 2000s America was considered to be far behind in that area. Europeans invented GSM, America was behind with CDMA networks. Nokia ruled the world and made premium phones. i-mode dominated not only Japan but also Europe and rest of the world. Everyone was studying Symbian (sh*tty British PDA/mobile OS). Nobody took rumors that Apple considering making mobile phones seriously. And then suddenly one day everything changed. When we finished our product for i-mode it became obsolete and i-mide was dead. And where is Nokia today? Europeans and Japanese became irrelevant. CDMA won and Europeans were always one generation behind because they had to redo all their network which was not designed for CDMA. So things may and will change in the ways you would never expect, you know. Especially when Silicon valley is taken into equation.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Nov 06, 2017

    The thing that many other posters here have danced around is this: For Cadillac and Lincoln to make a go of it, they need the other brands in the stable to agree to play nice and agree to cede the top of the market to its respective luxury brand. As long as you can get a Chevy within spitting distance of a Cadillac in terms of cost and features, you're going to have a problem. Some of that is Cadillac needing to have more than Magnetic Ride Control, but some of that is Chevy needs to be willing to tell its customers "if you want Feature X you'll have to go to the Cadillac dealer down the street". This is especially true with Ford where there's no "middle" brand to carve out. That's the one thing about FCA... Chrysler may not ever be considered "near luxury" ever again, but the general one-or-at-most-two-brand(s)-per-segment philosophy makes that easier to do.

    • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Nov 06, 2017

      “if you want Feature X you’ll have to go to the Cadillac dealer down the street”. That's why I've said (for years, for so long I've stopped saying it) GM only makes sense if every dealership were a "GM STORE" where if I don't like the available features on an Impala the salesman can walk me over to the Lacrosse or the CTS. Dealership owners don't have to whine about loosing sales because you can't get feature X on the cars I sell. Heck the only reason the Buick Verano was built was to give the kind of people who bought Grand Ams something to buy. If GM sold all of its brands at one dealership they could have simply been shown a Cruze.

  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Rna65689660 For such a flat surface, why not get smoke tint, Rtint or Rvynil. Starts at $8. I used to use a company called Lamin-x, but I think they are gone. Has held up great.
  • Cprescott A cheaper golf cart will not make me more inclined to screw up my life. I can go 500 plus miles on a tank of gas with my 2016 ICE car that is paid off. I get two weeks out of a tank that takes from start to finish less than 10 minutes to refill. At no point with golf cart technology as we know it can they match what my ICE vehicle can do. Hell no. Absolutely never.
  • Cprescott People do silly things to their cars.
  • Jeff This is a step in the right direction with the Murano gaining a 9 speed automatic. Nissan could go a little further and offer a compact pickup and offer hybrids. VoGhost--Nissan has  laid out a new plan to electrify 16 of the 30 vehicles it produces by 2026, with the rest using internal combustion instead. For those of us in North America, the company says it plans to release seven new vehicles in the US and Canada, although it’s not clear how many of those will be some type of EV.Nissan says the US is getting “e-POWER and plug-in hybrid models” — each of those uses a mix of electricity and fuel for power. At the moment, the only all-electric EVs Nissan is producing are the  Ariya SUV and the  perhaps endangered (or  maybe not) Leaf.In 2021, Nissan said it would  make 23 electrified vehicles by 2030, and that 15 of those would be fully electric, rather than some form of hybrid vehicle. It’s hard to say if any of this is a step forward from that plan, because yes, 16 is bigger than 15, but Nissan doesn’t explicitly say how many of those 16 are all-battery, or indeed if any of them are.  https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/25/24111963/nissan-ev-plan-2026-solid-state-batteries
Next