American Car Buyers Less Satisfied With Domestics, Toyota Perpetually Fine: Study

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
american car buyers less satisfied with domestics toyota perpetually fine study

Overall contentment among domestic vehicle owners dropped slightly in this year’s American Customer Satisfaction Index. Meanwhile, enjoyment from European and Asian automakers stayed roughly the same. However, that information might not be quite so useful until you begin comparing individual brands (and even other industries).

Domestic automakers averaged 80 out of a possible 100 points in the ACSI scale, with General Motors as the only American manufacturer seeing an improvement from 2016. For the sake of comparison, let’s see how other industries are doing on either end of the spectrum: Cable companies, which everyone hates, averaged 64 points and television sets, which everyone loves, scored 87 points.

By and large, that doesn’t place automakers in the doghouse. But it does highlight a modest shift in the perception of specific domestic brands while longtime satisfaction leaders, like Toyota and Lexus, hold pole position.

General Motors made some serious gains in the latest ranking. Most notably with its Cadillac division, which saw a 5.1-point increase in consumer satisfaction over 2016. Meanwhile, GMC held its impressive 84-point score — placing it against Mercedes-Benz, which gained 3.7 points, and just behind Subaru’s third-place score of 85.

Buick also saw a slight increase in consumer pleasure (1.3 points), while Chevrolet lost 2.4 points. This left GM with a company-wide average of 82 points as rivals Ford and Fiat Chrysler both slipped rather dramatically.

While Lincoln’s overall score for 2017 is tied with Cadillac’s 83 points, that represents a 4.6-percent drop in consumer pleasure from 2016. Ford’s mainstream brand also saw a modest loss, but it still outperformed all non-Jeep FCA brands. Both Dodge and Fiat occupied the lowest slots, with 75 points apiece. Mitsubishi yielded a 78-point score, followed by Volkswagen and Ford’s 79 points.


The combined scores of all brands suppressed FCA to 77 points overall, leaving 81 points for Ford. These scores also widened the ACSI’s gap between domestic and foreign automakers, leaving North American brands with 80 points against Europe and Asia’s 82. While that difference seems tolerable, ACSI Chairman and founder Claes Fornell referenced the damning nature of some recalls (which visibly hurt Volkswagen) and wondered if the results weren’t indicative of something more.

“Chances are that we have seen this movie before,” said Fornell in a statement. “There was a surge in demand and increasing customer satisfaction with foreign cars in the 1980s, mostly because the domestic auto industry had difficulty keeping up. While U.S. cars have improved much over the years, they have not been as consistent in quality and customer satisfaction compared with their international counterparts. Experience with the Great Recession shows that this movie does not have a good ending unless major steps are taken — not another Government bailout, but rather a renewed focus on how to create satisfied and loyal customers.”

That certainly plays into market research firms being “the key” to unlocking a manufacturer’s true potential. Certain brands have continued to struggle over the years and the complete version of the ACSI’s yearly breakdown highlights that slippage rather well. Let’s remember that, while influenced by mechanical missteps and recalls, this is a measurement of public perception and some automakers have clearly failed at maintaining their image.

[Image: Toyota]

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 27 comments
  • Whitworth Whitworth on Sep 05, 2017

    How many decades has Chrysler/Dodge been at the bottom of quality surveys across the board? They really do seem to be happy being a subprime automaker.

  • Rolando Rolando on Sep 05, 2017

    Toyota, drives like a Chevy, looks like a Pontiac with all that cladding! You never go full Pontiac!

  • MelanieRichardson GOOD
  • El scotto @jwee; Sir, a great many of us believe that Musk is somewhere (pretty high) on the spectrum and move on.I work on the fringes of IT. Most of my presentations get picked over extensively and intensely at meetings. I'm smart enough to know I'm not that smart and willingly take advice from the IT crew. I bring them Duck Doughnuts too. We also keep a box of Crayolas in the meeting room.At one meeting an IT guy got way into the details of my presentation, the meeting went long as we discussed my target audience. Same IT guy insisted it was a disaster and would fail miserable and that I was stupid. Yeah, F-boms get dropped at our meetings. I finally had enough and asked if he was such an expert, did he want to stand up in front of 30 senior executives and give the presentation? His response was a flat "NO". He got the box of Crayolas. For you non-military types that means shut up and color. Musk is the same as that IT guy, lots of gyrations but not much on follow-through. Someone just needs to hand him a box of Crayolas.
  • FreedMike The FJ Cruiser would be a better comeback candidate. The gang back at Toyota HQ must be looking at all those Broncos flying off Ford lots and kicking themselves.
  • Tassos 2015 was only 7 years ago. $58k is still a whole lot of $ to pay for a vehicle. FOrtunately one can buy a flagship vehicle with great active and passive safety for half this amount, if one does the SMART thing and buys a pre-owned luxury flagship vehicle. they have historically been SCREAMING BARGAINS. A breadvan on stilts SUV, wether the more compact Macan or the more bloated Cayenne will never pass as a Flagship Vehicle. No matter how well it drives or how reliable it suprisingly is. It still is a breadvan on stilts.
  • Sean Ohsee Bring back the 100 series and its I6 diesel.
Next