Nissan Accused of 'Nastiest Anti-union Campaign' in Modern U.S. History

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
nissan accused of 8216 nastiest anti union campaign in modern u s history

The United Auto Workers has accused Nissan of illegally intimidating workers at its Canton Manufacturing and Assembly Plant in Mississippi, calling its activities one of the “nastiest anti-union campaigns in the modern history of the American labour movement.” The alleged misdeeds include running anti-unionization videos on loop in factory break rooms and convincing plant managers to pull workers aside to discourage them from voting in favor of the UAW this Thursday and Friday.

However, if Nissan is guilty of rabid anti-union measures, the UAW is likely guilty of countering the company with its own door-to-door campaign. Southern states haven’t been as receptive to unionizing as the UAW would like, and the organization has doubled its efforts to get the Canton workers on board, hoping to negotiate higher wages and improved benefits.

UAW Secretary-Treasurer Gary Casteel said the union is confident a majority of workers support unionization but expressed bitterness toward the automaker’s tactics to dissuade them.

“I’ve not seen it worse,” he said in an interview with Automotive News. “I’ve seen some crazy employers. But these guys’ rap sheet now reads like Al Capone. They just break law after law. Most companies of this size, if you look at any of them, have certain things they just don’t do because it’s unethical.”

While the Capone reference is probably ill-advised, considering labor racketeering was a common practice for the famous gangster, his annoyance with Nissan is understandable since his success is dependent upon beating it. But Nissan has a lot to lose if its Mississippi workforce unionizes. Many automakers shifted assembly to the southern United States to avoid paying the higher wages associated with northern, UAW-affiliated plants.

The extent of Nissan’s in-house propaganda is currently unverified, but public displays of union opposition exist. The automaker has taken out anti-union ads that run on local television networks and enlisted the help of Republican governor Phil Bryant. “If you want to take away your job, if you want to end manufacturing as we know it in Mississippi, just start expanding unions,” Bryant said last week.

However, Casteel said it goes much further than that, accusing Nissan of threatening or bribing workers to vote no while also forcing them to attend routine anti-union roundtable group meetings.

“It’s a mixed bag,” he said. “I’m sure they’re deterring some people, but others are saying, ‘I’m not going to take this or be pushed around on this issue.'”

Nissan has called the UAW’s intimidation claims “baseless” and “false,” saying it respects the rights of its roughly 3,700 workers at the Canton plant to choose whether to unionize. “Nissan employees have the right to know the company’s position regarding UAW representation in our plant, as well as important information about the UAW,” a Nissan spokeswoman said in an official statement. “The UAW has advocated employees only hear one side of the story — the union’s side — and that’s wrong.”

“The latest UAW corruption scandal in Detroit and the history of strikes, layoffs, and plant closures at UAW-represented plants, along with the many false claims and promises made by the UAW during this campaign are among the many reasons we do not believe UAW representation is in the best interest of the employees of Nissan Canton,” she continued.

The scandal she’s referring to is the Justice Department’s allegation that late UAW Vice President General Holiefield and former FCA labor chief Alphons Iacobelli conspired to s teal millions of dollars from a corporate training fund to buy things for themselves — $37,500 pens, for example.

“We were apprehensive about some of [Holiefield’s] behaviors, so we cut him out of the leadership team,” Casteel said, regarding Holiefield’s exit from the union in 2014. “Lo and behold, when we found out, we took every action to cooperate with . It’s the actions of one individual.”

On Friday, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) — the independent US government agency responsible for enforcing US labor law — filed the latest in a series of complaints against Nissan. The NLRB believes Nissan violated the law in its anti-union sessions by warning workers would lose wages and benefits if they supported the union, while also promising raises to management who encouraged employees to vote “no.”

Meanwhile, UAW is under pressure from the Mississippi Manufacturers Association, which has come out against unionization. “I have not heard any articulation by the UAW as to why they need a union and what benefits there would even be,” said Jay Moon, the association’s chief executive. “We don’t believe that anybody ought to be between the employee and the employer.”

Moon’s assertion is that the union desperately needs more member dues in order to survive, something Casteel refutes based on the organization’s growth over the past decade. He claims the push to unionize is all about corporate accountability and fairness.

“If you told somebody years ago we’d be paying people $12.50 an hour assembling cars, nobody would’ve believed you,” he said. “We talk about American jobs and bringing jobs back onshore, but the bigger issue is when you bring them back, what are the conditions of them? The standard of living these jobs create is not good.”

The final vote that decides whether the Canton factory unionizes (and opens up the South to UAW), takes place at the end of the week.

Join the conversation
2 of 106 comments
  • Jacob_coulter Jacob_coulter on Aug 03, 2017

    I guess the 1st Amendment only applies to Unions and not owners of a company.

  • Dr. Claw Dr. Claw on Aug 05, 2017

    The only difference between Southern states with their resentment for actual paid labor and Mexico, China, (anywhere they offshore and "people" complain about) is that it's in the U.S.A. and thus somehow "better". It's the same "race to the bottom" BS that ought not to be tolerated, but...

  • Dukeisduke I saw a well-preserved Mark VII LSC on the road not too long ago, and I had to do a double-take. They still have a presence. Back when these were new, a cousin of mine owned an LSC with the BMW turbo diesel.
  • Dukeisduke I imagine that stud was added during the design process for something, and someone further along the process forgot to delete it after it became unnecessary.
  • Analoggrotto Knew about it all along but only now did the risk analysis tilt against leaving it there.
  • Mike Beranek Funny story about the '80 T-bird. My old man's Dart Sport had given up the ghost so he was car-shopping. He & I dropped my mom at a store and then went to the Ford dealer, where we test-drove the new T-Bird (with digital dash!)So we pull up to the store to pick mom up. She walks out and dad says "We just bought it.". Mom stares at the Mulroney- almost 13 grand- and just about fell over.Dad had not in fact bought the T-Bird, instead he got a Cordoba for only 9 grand.
  • EngineerfromBaja_1990 I'd love a well preserved Mark VII LSC with the HO 5.0 for a weekend cruiser. Its design aged better than both the VI and VIII. Although I'd gladly take the latter as well (quad cam V8 and wrap around interior FTW)