Uber Fires Notorious Engineer After Failing to Cooperate With Investigation

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
uber fires notorious engineer after failing to cooperate with investigation

Uber Technologies Inc. has fired Anthony Levandowski, the engineer at the center of the company’s legal battle with Google and Alphabet’s self-driving division Waymo. The company confirmed the departure Tuesday, after weeks of Levandowski remaining silent as the court attempted to make sense of what had taken place between the two companies (as well as Uber’s own internal investigation).

The Waymo’s lawsuit alleges Levandowski stole proprietary information relating to their self-driving vehicles, which he then handed to Uber. In May, U.S. District Judge William Alsup stated that he believed there was evidence to suggest Uber had gained trade secrets belonging to Google and that Levandowski should be removed from his lead engineering role. However, the ride-sharing firm claims he was taken off autonomous development in April.

Uber has maintained the termination is not an admission of guilt, but the direct result of Levandowski’s unwillingness to cooperate. An internal email, acquired by The New York Times, doubles down on that position.

“Over the last few months Uber has provided significant evidence to the court to demonstrate that our self-driving technology has been built independently,” Angela L. Padilla, Uber’s associate general counsel for employment and litigation, wrote in an staff email. “Over that same period, Uber has urged Anthony to fully cooperate in helping the court get to the facts and ultimately helping to prove our case.”

There could also have been pressure on Uber to make an example of Levandowski after a comprehensive piece outlining the company’s most egregious activities was published in NYMag over the weekend. The article goes far beyond recent missteps by highlighting the firm’s unstable business model, unsavory corporate culture, poor treatment of drivers, needless risk-taking, and an overall negative impact on the environment — despite Uber’s attempts to brand itself as eco-friendly.

Still, when you think about it, having scores of vehicles milling around a city in the hopes that an individual might eventually hail one doesn’t exactly sound like a green initiative.

The NYMag piece even managed to collect loads of scathingly negative comments from former employees — including one alleging Levandowski was annoyed Tesla had the first autonomous-related fatality, as it signaled his team wasn’t pushing R&D hard enough. “I’m pissed we didn’t have the first death,” he was reported to have said.

If that’s true, and Levandowski denies it, one might wonder why Uber didn’t cut him loose earlier. The company definitely doesn’t need another magnet for bad publicity hanging around its neck.

This week, the company is expected to wrap up its own internal investigation over claims of sexual harassment, discrimination, and a mismanagement in payroll that shortchanged drivers millions of dollars. Uber’s board should be presented with the results by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who is leading the investigation, on Wednesday. A separate human resources investigation is also underway.

Levandowski has 20 days to contest Uber’s decision if he so chooses.

[Image: Transport Topics/ Flickr ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]

Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • -Nate -Nate on Jun 02, 2017

    There's a whole lotta smoke here, so I imagine we'll find the fire in due time . . -Nate

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Jun 12, 2017

    Of course, the $64,000 question here is, was he actually cut loose or is this a smokescreen and he'll reappear as a contractor, perhaps under the obfuscation of a LLC or two?

  • Jalop1991 I say, install gun racks.Let the games begin!
  • EBFlex For those keeping track, Ford is up to 24 recalls this year and is still leading the industry. But hey, they just build some Super Dutys that are error free. Ford even sent out a self congratulatory press release saying they built Super Duty’s with zero defects. What an accomplishment!
  • Norman Stansfield This is what you get when you run races to keep the cars bunched together for more excitement. F1 doesn't seem to have this problem after the first few laps.
  • SCE to AUX Too many cars = more wrecks. With today's speeds on essentially the same old track, starting with half the cars could reduce the congestion at the end. Or maybe it would increase the problem because the herd wouldn't thin early on.I say no overtime - finish at 500 miles and no more.