QOTD: Is Subaru Now A Mainstream Automaker? And If So, Is That A Good Thing?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

A band is only cool until everybody knows it’s cool.

Subaru, long a niche automaker with unique product offerings and limited geographic appeal, has tripled its U.S. market share over the last decade. Subaru will likely sell more than 650,000 new vehicles in the U.S. this year. The Subaru Outback and Forester are among America’s 12 most popular utility vehicles. And in a shrinking car market, U.S. sales of the Subaru Impreza — a newly launched compact for 2017 — are up 41 percent so far this year.

Subaru just dropped a new, fifth-gen Impreza 5-door in my driveway for a week-long test. It’s quite clearly the best Impreza ever: quiet, refined, solid, sufficiently powerful. The driver’s door armrest is plush. The car itself is — and we’re talking about an Impreza here — quite attractive.

The 2017 Subaru Impreza is, to be frank, normal. It doesn’t sound like a thrummy flat-four is present under the hood. The seating position doesn’t put your hips and feet on the same level. The windows have frames. There are other people driving the same car.

Has Subaru become a mainstream automaker? And if so, has some of Subaru’s appeal been lost?

Yes, and no.

This is 2017, not 2007. With nearly 4 percent market share, Subaru isn’t just any ol’ alternative punk rock band. Subaru is singing from the Top 40 song sheet. Somebody that I used to know called me maybe under my umbrella.

But that doesn’t mean Subaru isn’t still sending power to all four wheels virtually across-the-board. The engines are still Boxers, even though the Impreza’s 2.0-liter doesn’t sound like one. The traditional sedan body style accounts for a mere fraction of the brand’s sales.

Subaru is clearly still Subaru. But will the brand’s massive popularity uptick undo the Subaru spell?

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net and a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 85 comments
  • Macnab Macnab on May 25, 2017

    A couple of years ago Consumer Reports said that they've found that Subarus use more oil as they age than other brands. Then I read someplace else (maybe here) that they use "low tension" piston rings, presumably to reduce friction. Can anybody comment on this? Oil consumption doesn't bother me much but could it also mean more gas blowby? That would bother me more.

    • NormSV650 NormSV650 on May 28, 2017

      Subaru used low friction piston ring lands to cook epa fuel economy numbers. Just like every 3rd Subaru had a cracked windshield due to its thin material for weight reduction to cook epa numbers. Should I go on about the thin wiring in our 2012 Forester that blew cigg lighter fuse and would bog the power windows whenever another switch was pulled?

  • WallMeerkat WallMeerkat on May 26, 2017

    Subaru died a little, in the UK at least, when they replaced their iconic rally-bred Impreza with a generic looking hatchback that looked like a previous generation Kia.

  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
  • The Oracle Some commenters have since passed away when this series got started.
  • The Oracle Honda is generally conservative yet persistent, this will work in one form or fashion.
  • Theflyersfan I love this car. I want this car. No digital crap, takes skill to drive, beat it up, keep on going.However, I just looked up the cost of transmission replacement:$16,999 before labor. That's the price for an OEM Mitsubishi SST. Wow. It's obvious from reading everything the seller has done, he has put a lot of time, energy, and love into this car, but it's understandable that $17,000 before labor, tax, and fees is a bridge too far. And no one wants to see this car end up in a junkyard. The last excellent Mitsubishi before telling Subaru that they give up. And the rear facing car seat in the back - it's not every day you see that in an Evo! Get the kid to daycare in record time! Comments are reading that the price is best offer. It's been a while since Tim put something up that had me really thinking about it, even something over 1,000 miles away. But I've loved the Evo for a long time... And if you're going to scratch out the front plate image, you might want to do the rear one as well!
Next