Cash-strapped Volkswagen Thinking of Dropping Ducati: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After history’s largest and most expensive automotive scandal forced a sudden pivot at Volkswagen Group — from expansion-minded to profit-focused — the German automaker might let go of a cherished toy.

According to insider sources who spoke to Reuters, VW is exploring the sale of Italian motorcycle manufacturer Ducati as part of a company-wide streamlining effort. After shoveling over $20 billion to the United States in a bid to end its diesel debacle, the company is in full penny-pinching mode.

The revered boutique motorcycle company was a long-awaited feather in ex-VW chairman Ferdinand Piëch’s hat, but after just five years of ownership, it may be time for Ducati to find a new home.

Two sources claim VW has hired investment banking firm Evercore to look at money-saving options, including a Ducati sell-off. This shouldn’t come as a major shock. One year ago, the company admitted in its annual earnings report that unexpected expenses could lead to a sell-off of one or more of its many holdings. (The brief mention was subsequently downplayed by VW’s chief financial officer.)

While no decision has been made on the divestment, VW has already reached out in search of potential buyers, the sources claim.

Volkswagen Group’s Audi brand purchased Ducati for just under $1 billion in 2012, 18 years after Piëch, a motorcycle enthusiast, passed on an earlier chance. Ducati began manufacturing its own motorcycles in 1950 after first selling small engines for bicycle conversions. The company was founded in 1926 as a radio component manufacturer.

In recent decades, Ducati became something of a foster child. After being sold to Italian motorcycle manufacturer Cagiva in 1985, the brand fell under the control of private equity firm TPG Capital in the late 1990s. The following decade, it changed hands again, this time to Investindustrial Holdings.

Both VW and Audi refused to comment on the report. Should the company decide to let the storied brand go, it could prove a lucrative move — one of the sources estimates Ducati’s value at 1.5 billion euros ($1.63 billion), 15 times what the sportbike builder earns every year.

[Image: Audi AG]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 26 comments
  • Bikegoesbaa Bikegoesbaa on Apr 27, 2017

    Bah to Ducati. Was fixing to buy a Hypermotard before I learned they use un-warranted timing belts because "tradition".

    • See 2 previous
    • Tylermattikow Tylermattikow on Apr 28, 2017

      @bikegoesbaa In the late 2000's Ducati vastly increased service intervals in response to these concerns. The Desmo and belt service is at 7500 miles, which is a pretty long time for a bike considering how little most are ridden. I believe the interval used to be 4500... For the record my bike only had one issue, a faulty immobilizer when it was nearly new. It now has 6500 miles and it is 8 years old with no other problems.

  • Markf Markf on Apr 27, 2017

    Yeah, timing belt and Desmo valves "Tradition" Ducati is a lifestyle brand, like every guy on a Harley every Ducati rider has branded clothing on when they ride. But they can't make enough of them. I'll stick with Aprilia, Italian bikes, reliable and much less than Ducati. Just hard to find dealers and get proper service.....

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next