Waste of Base: Deals Don't Always Extend to Base Models

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Most readers are aware of my unbridled enthusiasm for base model cars. Sure, there are a few luxury models that spring to mind where it’s imperative buyers select the top trim, lest they run the risk of an arch nemesis pulling alongside them in an Escalade Platinum when they are piloting a lowly Escalade Luxury.

Thing is, it behooves the frugal customer to pay attention before they sign the note on a set of base wheels. For years, commercials told us “ America Runs on Dunkin” when we all know that America Runs on Monthly Payments. Most shoppers have a monthly or biweekly figure in mind and, examined through that lens, base cars aren’t always the best deal.

Take the 2017 Chevy Equinox as an example. With a newly redesigned model on the way for 2018, you can bet dealers are anxious to move their old stock. The base, front-wheel drive Equinox L stickers for $23,995. As of this writing, no (visible) cash is on the hood. Moving up a rung, an Equinox LS with the same drivetrain shows a suggested price of $26,405. Sounds about right, given the extra kit like satellite radio and such that appear on the more expensive model.

Once one looks closely, customers of the more expensive LS benefit from a $2000 allowance towards the MSRP, plus an additional $1,250 cash back for *ahem* well-qualified buyers. That knocks the bottom line well down into base model territory. No one benefits from an atrocious 6.9% interest rate over 72 months, however.

Chrysler’s 300 is another good illustration. The base model Limited (yes, the cheapest 300 is called the Limited) has an MSRP of $32,260. On a 30,000-mile three-year lease, a myriad of offers and incentives put the monthly payment in at $403 per month with no down payment. Or, purchase the thing over 72 months at 1.9% for $37 more per month.

Here’s where it gets fun: the 300S, a full $3,335 more dear than the base model, works out to be a few shekels cheaper per month than its lowly brother. Absent of any down payment and flush with incentives, the snazzier 300 — equipped with better rimz and BeatsAudio approved by Dre — is an even $400 a month on an equivalent three year, 30,000-mile lease.

Don’t think it’s solely the domestic manufacturers playing this game. Infiniti has foisted its diminutive QX30 upon a crossover-hungry marketplace, offering an array of trims on its stylish take of Merc’s GLA250. The base model opens at $29,950. Customers can take a $2,650 walk to the next trim level, a Luxury trim that essentially adds heated leather seats.

Yet, the more expensive QX30 is only $10 more per month on a 39-month lease, thanks again to aggressive lease discounts on the costlier trim. An extra $390 over the term of the lease is worth considering, given the extra kit between the two models.

These aren’t the only models where pricing shenanigans on the lowest rung make stepping up a more financially sound decision. The folks over at carsdirect.com have a few more examples.

None of this dampens my enthusiasm for base cars. Smart customers, as always, will read the fine print and seek out the best deal. Now, go spend your lunch break on various Build and Price tools. My browser history is rife with ‘em.

Payments and prices in these examples do not include taxes or destination charges. ZIP codes for Florida were used on the build and price tools because I’m freezing my nuts off in eastern Canada and dreaming of warmer climes, so rebates and discounts are calculated specifically for that area of the country. However, with a few exceptions, incentives appear to be similar across the nation. As always, do exhaustive research and bargain hard before signing any paper in the F&I office.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Tjh8402 Tjh8402 on Feb 24, 2017

    With regards to the Chevy and maybe the Chrysler, I'm thinking that base model is intended more as a rental car special, hence the lack of consumer incentives. I'm also wondering if part of that price difference is skewed in lease figures because especially when it comes to luxury cars, a base model may depreciate more than one with more desirable options. I had someone who sold Toyotas and Lexus's say that Lexus's without navigation were used car lot queens, so the extra cost to lease one with nav was minimal thanks to better residuals. That, and the ability to simplify manufacturing and ordering and stock up on fewer configurations is probably why a lot of the luxury car lease specials you see will include popular features like leather, navigation, and sunroofs.

  • Jalop1991 Jalop1991 on Feb 24, 2017

    tl;dr "it's just math. If you're bad at math, you're screwed."

  • Jkross22 Their bet to just buy an existing platform from GM rather than build it from the ground up seems like a smart move. Building an infrastructure for EVs at this point doesn't seem like a wise choice. Perhaps they'll slow walk the development hoping that the tides change over the next 5 years. They'll probably need a longer time horizon than that.
  • Lou_BC Hard pass
  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Next