Owners Beware: Halloween Is a Terrifying Time for Cars

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
As fun as it is to overhype the dangers of Halloween to frighten adults, we all know that poisoned candy and razor blade-filled apples are bunk. The odds of you finding an anthrax-laden piece of taffy are so improbable that they aren’t worth mentioning. You are statistically more likely to harm yourself by drinking a glow stick out of curiosity.That doesn’t mean there aren’t spooky things going on. Plenty of sinister automotive stuff happens on October 31, making Halloween a scary time for cars.Car thefts on October 31 tend to be higher than the status quo, at least in recent history. To prove it, the National Insurance Crime Bureau examined data from the National Crime Information Center’s stolen vehicle file from 2011 to 2015.Last year’s Halloween saw a 7 percent jump in car thefts over the daily average. But the largest increase during the study’s five year span came in 2011, with 2,328 thefts on Halloween compared with the daily average of 2,054 — a 13 percent jump. The only year included in the study that didn’t show a higher incidence of theft was 2012. However, that year saw more cars stolen overall.While more devastatingly sad than bone-chillingly spooky, children are traditionally much more likely to be hit by cars on Halloween. Accidents on that day go up in general, but 50 percent of the fatalities involve kids under fifteen. And drivers between 15 and 25 cause nearly a third of those fatal accidents.The good news, according to the Sperling’s researchers who compiled the data, is that accidents have trended downward in recent years. The bad news is that the number of drunk drivers involved did not. Roughly 23 percent of pedestrian fatalities on Halloween involve a drunk driver and almost half of those involved a driver with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 or higher.And if you’re thinking that you can avoid all of this by just staying off the roads on October 31 with your car’s battery removed and fuel tank drained, think again. Vehicular vandalism goes through the roof on All Hallows’ Eve.The Highway Loss Data Institute looked at insurance claims for vandalism made between 2008 through 2012. With a calculated average of 692 claims a day, Halloween raked in a whopping 1,253 — more than any other day of the year. That’s a lot of slashed tires, smashed windows, and body panels with freshly scratched-in curse words.Happy Halloween.[Image: Kafziel/ WikimediaCommons ( CC BY-SA 3.0)]
Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 19 comments
  • Old Man Pants Old Man Pants on Oct 19, 2016

    I'll be out in the pumpkin patch as usual, freezin' ass and waitin' for the Great Pumpkin or Model 3, whichever shows first. Scoff all you like, Saracens.

    • See 7 previous
    • Drzhivago138 Drzhivago138 on Oct 19, 2016

      @28-Cars-Later That was a muted trombone, I think.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Nov 18, 2016

    Back around 2000 I lived in a gated community of mostly retirees. One Halloween I went into Chicago to stay with a buddy and see George Carlin. I came home to find that while I was gone, someone drove their car over 100 feet down my driveway to rear end my Wildcat hard enough to pop the dash pad loose. Obviously whoever did it was never caught so I'll never know whether it was just some drunk who missed a turn or whether it had to do with the neighbor kid who liked to let "friends" into the development to break into cars and wound up having to pay me $1800 in restitution.

  • EBFlex Garbage but for less!
  • FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
  • RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
  • Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
  • Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Next