SEC Investigating Tesla for Failing to Notify Investors of Fatal Crash

by Steph Willems

Published: July 12th, 2016

sec investigating tesla for failing to notify investors of fatal crash

Was the fatal May crash of a Tesla Model S driving in Autopilot mode significant enough for the automaker to inform its shareholders? The Securities and Exchange Commission plans to find out.

The federal agency recently opened an investigation into Tesla to determine if the automaker broke securities laws by not notifying investors of the crash, according to the Wall Street Journal.

To reach a conclusion, the SEC needs to decide whether the May 7 crash that killed Joshua Brown on a Florida highway was a “material” event — an incident serious enough to warrant a securities filing, which would make investors aware of potential risk.

Brown died after his vehicle’s semi-autonomous Autopilot system failed to recognize a tractor-trailer crossing the highway in front of him. The radar-and-camera setup controlling the system mistook the brightly lit trailer for the surrounding sky, meaning it didn’t alert the driver or begin emergency braking.

Tesla informed the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the crash on May 16, but the first time investors heard of it was a June 30 blog post on the automaker’s website. (That post coincided with media reports detailing the NHTSA’s investigation into the crash.)

By late May, Tesla investigators determined that the victim’s Autopilot system contributed to the crash, but not before the company sold $2 billion of stock.

A source familiar with the matter told the WSJ that the SEC investigation is preliminary, and might not result in any action on the part of the agency.

Even before the SEC announced its probe, some critics argued the crash counted as “material.” Tesla and the publication Fortune waged an online battle over the debate, with the magazine stating the automaker should have revealed details of the crash earlier.

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Correction: An earlier version of this story stated the Tesla Autopilot system used laser and camera technology to see objects in its vicinity. Tesla vehicles do not use laser, but use radar. We’ve corrected the article to reflect this.

#Autopilot #Government #Investors #SEC #SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission #Tesla #TeslaCrash

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 25 comments

MostlyNormal on Jul 12, 2016

The Tesla system is radar and camera based, they do not have a laser sensor of any kind. The grownup automakers and Google are all developing real autonomous systems using LiDAR (a spinning laser), which would have easily 3D mapped a freaking tractor trailer.

Like Reply
- NickS on Jul 12, 2016
  
  Given this failure, the front facing detection hardware would have to be relying on visible light, i.e. cameras. I think they use radar for the sides. Radar on the front wouldn't miss a white trailer against the sun.
  
  Like
MostlyNormal on Jul 12, 2016

@NickS: I can imagine a failure mode with forward looking radar if the radar field of view is limited to hood height and below.

Like Reply
- NickS on Jul 12, 2016
  
  Well, you'd expect them to tune the sensor position and orientation (which I have to admit should not be too much to exoect). I am quite astonished actually that they are NOT combining cameras, lidar AND radar on the front to eliminate the weaknesses inherent in any ONE of these. Even lidar has some weaknesses.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Bd2 If I had time to watch other people driving, then I would go for LMP.
Steve Biro There are 24 races on this year’s F1 schedule. And I guarantee you no more than two will be reasonably exciting, Meanwhile, F1’s reception for Andretti reveals the dark underbelly of the sport. I have followed F1 since the 1960s and, frankly, I am running out of interest. I’ll catch a race if it’s convenient but won’t bother DVRing them.
YellowDuck Been watching since the 80s, seriously since the 90s once we had reliable TV coverage. I'm in Canada though. Hey, and don't forget that the Interlagos race is also in a convenient time zone, as is Mexico. So that's 5 races in the Americas. Absolutely love it, but it takes a bit more interest in the technical / strategic side of things to really appreciate it. It's not just going fast in circles until someone crashes into someone else, while drunk people watch. The US can be proud of what it has contributed - Austin is one of the best tracks on the calendar, Vegas turned out to be much better than anyone could have hoped, and even Miami - a real Indy car-style track - produced a good race this year.
JMII I watch every F1 race, same with Indycar which is 100X better in terms of actual racing.
Dale Quelle surprise.