By on July 18, 2016

BYD

There’s money in them there cars, Samsung Electronics Company must have thought.

The Korean technology giant is in talks to buy a stake in Chinese automaker BYD, Reuters reports, and it isn’t the first time the company sought new cash streams from automotive world.

Samsung hasn’t disclosed what size stake it’s looking to buy or what the deal would be worth, but the company did say it wants to partner with the automaker to boost sales of its chips. BYD manufactures electric vehicles, buses and batteries for the Chinese market.

An earlier report that the company would buy a four percent stake turned out to be false.

“The latest investment aims at strengthening electric vehicle parts and smart phone parts businesses for the two companies,” the company said in a statement.

Connected vehicles require a heap of on-board technology, and Samsung wants a piece of that pie, especially given that the smart phone market isn’t a high-growth prospect. Long before BYD began manufacturing vehicles, Samsung was doing just that, after forming Samsung Motors (with technical help from Nissan) in 1994. Renault made the automaker its subsidiary in 2000, adding its name to the company moniker.

News of the potential buy-in sent the stock of Samsung’s SDI subsidiary soaring, but it dropped lower after the company said it didn’t plan to supply BYD with EV batteries.

[Image: Wikimedia Commons]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

10 Comments on “Samsung (Once Again) Turns to the Automobile Market to Make Money...”


  • avatar
    CoreyDL

    As long as Samsung steers clear of whatever Nissan is interested in making, I don’t think there will be an issue.

    BYD is Build Your Dreams, by the way. A stupid name for a car company.

    • 0 avatar
      Cactuar

      Build Your Dreams, Earth Dreams, Sky Activ… all silly names.

      • 0 avatar
        Big Al from Oz

        PowerStroke?

        What can that conjure up in the mind?

        Silly name. Maybe they should call the engine, F-250 Gravy Stroke.

        EcoBoost? What doe Eco stand for? Heavy fuel usage under normal use?

        EcoDiesel? It spews out chemicals and emissions that are not good for the mind and soul.

        • 0 avatar
          RHD

          Misnomers abound, especially in legislation: “Right to Work” states, “Patriot Act”, “Religious Freedom Act”… the name sounds good, but it misrepresents what the result of the laws will be.

      • 0 avatar
        morrinsville

        It wasnt Build Your Dreams, thats just a marketing phrase after the initials was first used for electronics and other products. The first product was rechargeable batteries.
        Forbes says BYD are the initials of the Chinese characters Bi Ya Di, which does not mean anything but sounds foreign or Western.

    • 0 avatar
      Lorenzo

      I thought BYD meant “Bring Your Dollars”, just as the forerunner of British Airways, BOAC, meant “Bring Over American Cash”.

  • avatar
    Big Al from Oz

    Irrespective of the names of the Chinese vehicle companies the long term plan for these manufacturers of EVs is to export.

    I’d say the Chinese will dominate the worlds producers of EVs. The Chinese have invested significant amounts of money into these vehicles.

    • 0 avatar
      Sjalabais

      …I’m just not quite sure when their breakthrough will occur. The markets have changed a lot since the Japanese and Korean brands found their way in. They’re pretty much consolidated. Aligned with the general press, I’ve been expecting a good Chinese product for a decade, the Landwind debacle and the aptly named Brilliance BS were mere setbacks, or so I thought. The Qoros and MG cars do not do well at all.

  • avatar
    Lorenzo

    Samsung would do better developing unique electronic products for auto companies and serving as a sole source, or best source supplier. There’s plenty of room for sorting out the controls and interfaces that have been introduced in cars, in particular developing functional durability of components. Over the next decade or so, lots of otherwise functional vehicles will have to be trashed because the first-generation electronics no longer work, can’t be replaced, and/or are no longer made.

  • avatar
    PrincipalDan

    So what Samsung ripoffs can we expect to see of cars from well established manufacturers?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • FreedMike: So what was the idea behind the Blackwing, other than wasting money?
  • mcs: @divide: “even though I’m not a huge fan of the duck face.” The aftermarket has a solution....
  • jack4x: People complaining about the price of this loaded up top trim press fleet car crack me up. As if you...
  • mcs: “on the other hand, why is it only Tesla deserves an exception?” Tesla never had a dealership...
  • dal20402: Only on TTAC: “The 200k mile service is too time-consuming. I won’t buy it.”

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States