New Jersey Road Projects Shut Down as State Spins Its Wheels on Gas Tax

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The Garden State remains the cheapest place to fill up in the Northeast, and you can thank government indecision for it.

Lawmakers in New Jersey can’t decide on what to do about their state’s bone-dry transportation fund, and residents are equally divided on how to pay for future road projects. That means pump prices will stay low for the time being.

A plan to raise the state’s famously low gas taxes by 23 cents a gallon hit a brick wall before the Independence Day weekend, after the Legislature failed to reach an agreement. As a result, Governor Chris Christie issued a call to stop all non-essential road and rail projects.

The state’s Transportation Trust Fund is expected to run out of money on August 1, though federal funding will still roll in for certain services.

Residents polled about a plan to amend the state’s constitution (to have all revenue from future and current gas taxes go towards road projects) were as divided as British referendum voters. Only 51 percent supported a constitutional amendment, which will be a question on this November’s ballot.

“With TTF funding soon to run out, and various solutions floated recently by the Governor and legislature seemingly going nowhere, voters remain lukewarm to the idea of amending the state constitution in order to address the TTF’s shortfall,” Krista Jenkins, director of polling firm PublicMind, told NJ.com.

The shutdown of non-essential projects means pothole repair and road resurfacing won’t go ahead until new state-level transportation funds are found. According to the New York Times, the plan to hike the gas tax, which was supported by Christie, bogged down after lawmakers couldn’t agree whether to offset the gas tax increase with a reduction in other areas, such as the sales tax or estate tax.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 91 comments
  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Jul 11, 2016

    If gas taxes fix roads, then they should keep pace with inflation. They are fair...use more gas, pay more. Drive a heavier car, pay more. An inflation index would fix the problem. No GPS tracking/taxes, no government database. (hey, they know where you are anyway...there are a LOT of ez pass readers for tracking/stats, not revenue) I suffer the NYC roads every day. They all suck, save the NY Thruway, Jersey Turnpike and Garden State Parkway, all separately managed toll roads. We have to pay for roads...an inflation indexed user tax is the most fair way. Using an SUV/CUV is entirely reasonable on these roads...you gotta be able to take a hit. Christie scares me. I want him nowhere near the White House. His veto of a much needed rail tunnel under the Hudson shows a shortsightedness you don't want in folks up that high. Yes, it was expensive, but sometimes you have to fix the roof when you don't really want to-and money is historically cheap now.. Don't confuse wasted tax money (war in Iraq, Dick Cheney's pension and medical care) with tax money spent on essential services, like bridge construction. We have a lovely set of 1930's and 1940's roads, but since Robert Moses, nothing has been built...we've only minimally maintained roads that my Grandfather paid for, drove with his 59 Imperial, in a world with half the traffic. Index gas tax to inflation...use it ONLY on roads and bridges, no subways, buses or other mass transit (the cross subsidy kills roads in NYC...all that bridge toll is flushed down the subway). I've been lucky enough to drive in first world nations....and our roads aren't first world any more. The whole estate tax or sales tax juggle in conjunction with this was just to muddy the waters, or get CC's campaign contributors the estate tax relief they so want. You do realize that the vast majority of normal Americans are below Estate Tax exemptions...so this IS a 1% issue only and not a fair swap off gas taxes to fix roads. Someone drown Grover Norquist in a bathtub, please.

    • See 1 previous
    • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Jul 12, 2016

      @56BelAire This is the sort of project where you need buy in from NY, NJ and the Feds. The existing tunnel was built in the age of steam, and every rail commuter can cite my automotive complaints about ancient infrastructure. If we have the money to re-arrange sand in backward nations we have no business being in, a tunnel in the middle of one of the richest areas of the US is a valid project. CC is a bit nuts. Look at his current education proposals which would impoverish urban districts while giving a tax cut to rich areas...somewhere, the Koch Bros. are smiling. We have lots of money, all for the wrong reasons, but the tap closes when it would be used for the general good.

  • 2manycars 2manycars on Jul 11, 2016

    Stop squandering money on social programs and there will be plenty of money to fix the roads.

    • See 2 previous
    • Bd2 Bd2 on Jul 13, 2016

      @highdesertcat Spending on welfare has been curtailed for the past few decades. Spending on the military took up 55% of the discretionary spending in 2015. Aside from the military, the vast bulk of govt. is non-discretionary spending (Social Security and Medicare). As for foodstamps - there are plenty of working people in foodstamps (who get paid minimum wage or close to it and have to support a family). And there are plenty of people who miss the threshold on being eligible for foodstamps and have to turn to food banks (which have been burdened by ever increasing demand).

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next