Automotive Hall of Fame Moving From Dearborn to Detroit, Wants to Be More Than a Museum

by Steph Willems

Published: July 22nd, 2016

automotive hall of fame moving from dearborn to detroit wants to be more than a

The Automotive Hall of Fame thinks it can better tell the history of the automobile if it makes a move to the Motor City.

William Chapin, the museum’s president, wants to expand the facility’s scope and become part of Detroit’s resurgence, so he’s looking for space near downtown, according to the Detroit Free Press.

Founded in New York City in 1939, the year General Motors brought us the automatic transmission, the museum has occupied a 25,000 square foot building on Oakwood Boulevard in Dearborn since 1997. It’s close, but it could be a lot closer to the birthplace of American car culture.

“We feel there is a need to develop a visitor destination downtown that will tell the global stories of automotive innovators and their innovations over the past 90-plus years with a spotlight on Detroit’s automotive heritage,” Chapin said yesterday at the annual induction ceremony, reported by Freep. “We also want to talk about the rebirth of the industry … and the creation of a hub for autonomous vehicles and new age manufacturing.”

The planned move is still just an idea, but Chapin said he’d like to find a location along Woodward Avenue. The facility is adjacent to The Henry Ford, and the automaker’s recent shuffle of its Dearborn facilities was the kick the Hall of Fame needed.

“We are right in the dead center of that,” Chapin said. “And, we have always had a bit of a marketing problem because many people think we are associated with Ford.”

According to CBS News, Chapin said the move would allow the Hall of Fame to become “more than just a car museum.”

This year’s crop of inductees was diverse. The museum honored former Ford CEO Alan Mulally, Bertha Benz (wife of automobile inventor Karl Benz and first-ever road trip driver), Roy Lunn, creator of the original Ford GT40, and … Ralph Nader. He’s the man who found the Chevrolet Corvair a bit lacking.

[Image: Bryan Debus/ Flickr]

#AutomotiveHallOfFame #CarCulture #Detroit #Heritage #History

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 24 comments

TheEndlessEnigma on Jul 22, 2016

"...wants to expand the facility’s scope and become part of Detroit’s resurgence..." What resurgence do you speak of?

Like Reply
- Adam Tonge on Jul 22, 2016
  
  If you were in the city's core in 2006 and then in 2016 you would see and feel the difference. You either haven't been to Detroit's Downtown/Midtown/New Center area then and now, or you are just trolling.
  
  Like
Jimbob457 on Jul 23, 2016

Why hot support a museum in the true birthplace of the automobile - Stuttgart.

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Ronnie Schreiber on Jul 24, 2016
  
  The Viennese would disagree. See: Marcus, Siegfried.
  
  Like
- Jimbob457 on Jul 24, 2016
  
  @Ronnie Schreiber Siegfried Marcus did produce a horseless carriage a few years earlier than Karl Benz. He never claimed to be the inventor of the horseless carriage or applied for a patent. More important, he did not found the corporate predecessor of Mercedes Benz. Henry Ford and Karl Benz were the two giants of the early industry.
  
  Like
- VoGo on Jul 24, 2016
  
  @jimbob457 Reasonable people can disagree over the origins of the automobile. Marcus certainly had a key role. The more obvious objection is why Americans would move the museum to Europe? It would be like deciding to move the Rock-n-Roll Hall of Fame from Cleveland to Liverpool.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?