Porsche-Piech Family 'Stand Behind' Volkswagen, Town Amid Crisis

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Deciding that the company’s annual pre-Christmas party wasn’t a great time to be Wetblanket Wildes, the Porsche-Piech clan affirmed that it would be committed to Volkswagen amid its emissions crises (pl.) and said the company that the family-owned company would “master the situation,” according to Reuters.

The Porsche-Piech family, who owns a majority stake in Volkswagen’s parent company, told the automaker’s board and the town of Wolfsburg that the family has no intention of pulling the plug.

“I am firmly convinced that the city of Wolfsburg together with Volkswagen will master the situation and gain further strength,” Wolfgang Porsche said in a statement, according to Reuters. “The Porsche and Piech families stand behind Volkswagen and Wolfsburg as its headquarters.”

Volkswagen has shed billions in value since the company admitted cheating emissions tests in September. Since then, automaker set aside more than $8 billion to help it pay for its diesel- and gasoline-powered cars that flouted emissions tests.

Volkswagen’s newly appointed CEO Matthias Müller said he was on board with staying afloat too because it’s just a good idea.

“We have to reorientate ourselves to stay relevant in the future. For Volkswagen, but also for Wolfsburg, I am confident that this can succeed and will succeed,” Müller said, according to Reuters.

For the small city of Wolfsburg, where most of its 125,000 residents work for Volkswagen, the news was likely a relief.

According to Wolfsburger Allgemeine, Müller met with Wolfsburg Mayor Klaus Mohr to discuss the future of the automaker, who pays more than $318 million into the city’s coffers each year. According to the German newspaper, a similarly sized city in Germany collects less than 25 percent of that sum.

When Volkswagen announced its cheating scandal the city immediately announced a hiring freeze and suspended building projects, according to the newspaper.


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 17 comments
  • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Dec 01, 2015

    A historical note: Wolfsburg would not even exist were it not for Volkswagen. It was founded in 1938 as "Stadt des KdF-Wagens bei Fallersleben", home of the new factory Hitler ordered built to assemble Dr. Porsche's KdF-Wagen and its military variants. KdF stood for Strength Through Joy, a Nazi run worker's organization that provided recreational opportunities like the KdF cruise ships that would be used as troop transports in the war (do you see a pattern emerging?). In the case of the prewar Volkswagen car, German workers had part of their pay deducted through the KdF organization and they received a book and stamps for each payment. Theoretically, when the stamp book was full it could be redeemed for a new KdF-Wagen. Historians say it was a scam and no workers ever got their cars. At the urging of British occupation forces, who were also responsible for getting the VW car company running after the war, the town was renamed Wolfsburg after a local castle. Wolfburg could be considered Germany's richest city, with the highest per capita income at $128,000/yr. Detroit was once America's richest per capita city, but it might have been less dependent on the car industry than Wolfsburg is. The size of the auto industry tends to obscure the fact that Detroit and Michigan have other industries.

  • Jasper2 Jasper2 on Dec 02, 2015

    If the Porsche-Piech clan said it, it must be so. I believe..........

  • SaulTigh Unless we start building nuclear plants and beefing up the grid, this drive to electrification (and not just cars) will be the destruction of modern society. I hope you love rolling blackouts like the US was some third world failed state. You don't support 8 billion people on this planet without abundant and relatively cheap energy.So no, I don't want an electric car, even if it's cheap.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCone of many cars I sold when I got commissioned into the army. 1964 Dodge D100 with slant six and 3 on the tree, 1973 Plymouth Duster with slant six, 1974 dodge dart custom with a 318. 1990 Bronco 5.0 which was our snowboard rig for Wa state and Whistler/Blackcomb BC. Now :my trail rigs are a 1985 Toyota FJ60 Land cruiser and 86 Suzuki Samurai.
  • RHD They are going to crash and burn like Country Garden and Evergrande (the Chinese property behemoths) if they don't fix their problems post-haste.
  • Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
  • Add Lightness I have nothing against paying more to get quality (think Toyota vs Chryco) but hate all the silly, non-mandated 'stuff' that automakers load onto cars based on what non-gearhead focus groups tell them they need to have in a car. I blame focus groups for automatic everything and double drivetrains (AWD) that really never gets used 98% of the time. The other 2% of the time, one goes looking for a place to need it to rationanalize the purchase.
Next