Automakers Desperate To Attract Younger Generation of Workers

by Aaron Cole

Updated: December 30th, 2020

Automotive News reported Saturday that several automakers are struggling to attract younger workers as young adults seem more disinterested with pursuing careers in manufacturing.

Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia Senior Vice President Randy Jackson said it’s important for the auto industry to soften the blow of reality when adulthood sets in:

“So many kids want to grow up and play in the NFL,” he says. “And college is a great thing, and it’s good to have a dream job out there. But if we can reach young people before they spend four years in college pursuing something that isn’t realistic, we might be able to open their eyes to something they will find very rewarding.”

According to the report, only 39 percent of children in Detroit said they would consider a career in the automotive industry and only 41 percent of their parents and teachers would recommend the industry too them.

Attracting and retaining younger manufacturing talent isn’t a struggle the automotive industry has on its own. As manufacturing jobs have left the States, so have interest in the remaining jobs. In 1953, manufacturing accounted for 28 percent of GDP in the U.S., but in 2012, that figure was around 11 percent. Many manufacturers say that students have the wrong impression of what assembly lines look like now.

“People still have the idea that manufacturing is a dirty dungeon place,” Andy Bushmaker of KI Furniture, told USA Today.

Several automakers, including Honda, have offered clinics and instructional booths to help attract workers. Honda has estimated that the U.S. will add 3.4 million manufacturing jobs by 2025, but will only have 1.4 million workers to fill those positions. In Ohio, the company has spent $1 million to attract middle- and high-school students to its jobs.

(Photo courtesy Wikipedia)

#Honda #Jobs #Manufacturing #Ohio #Youth

Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 185 comments

Sco on Oct 17, 2015

Thanks as usual Mikey for keeping it real

Like Reply
Thelaine on Oct 18, 2015

Economic growth has slowed so far in the twenty-first century. Taxes, regulations, aggressive redistribution of all types, uncontrolled illegal immigration, and other key disincentives for economic productivity and growth must be pared back or eliminated in the coming years in order for the economy to grow to the extent that the country can flourish in the future. Sticking with the status quo, on the other hand, will ultimately lead to further stagnation, decreased influence, a vanishing middle class, and a declining standard of living for all but the wealthiest. Voters will have to choose which of the two roads the country will take: growth and prosperity or statism, redistribution and stagnation.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Highdesertcat on Oct 18, 2015
  
  Sage words. America always gets exactly what it deserves..... because we vote for it.
  
  Like
- Thelaine on Oct 18, 2015
  
  @highdesertcat Yep. Don't blame the parties. Everything we got, we asked for.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Lou_BC I've had my collision alert come on 2 times in 8 months. Once was when a pickup turned onto a side road with minimal notice. Another with a bus turning left and I was well clear in the outside lane but turn off was in a corner. I suspect the collision alert thought I was traveling in a straight line.I have the "emergency braking" part of the system turned off. I've had "lane keep assist" not recognize vehicles parked on the shoulder.That's the extent of my experience with "assists". I don't trust any of it.
SCE to AUX A lot has changed since I got my license in 1979, about 2 weeks after I turned 16 (on my second attempt). I would have benefited from formal driver training, and waiting another year to get my license. I was a road terror for several years - lots of accidents, near misses, speeding, showing off - the epitome of youthful indiscretion.
Lou_BC Jellybean F150 (1997-2004). People tend to prefer the more square body and blunt grill style.
SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.