Crapwagon Outtake: 1994 Nissan Pathfinder

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn


I loved my 1st gen Pathfinder. Unlike today’s CUVs, it was a proper SUV — derived, and barely civilized from the compact pickup truck beneath. The ride was, as they say, trucklike. The accomodations, Spartan. And, until my wife decided the normally-sturdy VG30 V6 needed some additional positive crankcase ventilation on a subzero February morning, indestructible.

(I blame my wife, but really, I’m probably at fault, as I likely botched the coolant ratio when I changed fluids the prior fall. Alas, she doesn’t read TTAC.)

Unfortunately, when our truck was hauled to the nearby Nissan dealer, our phone call came not from the service department, but from sales. A quick inspection while on a lift revealed entirely too much of the inside of the frame rails, and not enough of the outsides. The Ohio winters had claimed another victim.

I reminisced about my truck while scouring eBay, Cars.com, and Autotrader today. I noticed that there are plenty of early Pathfinders out there, but very few with low miles. I saw a bunch with over 250,000 on the odometer, which is remarkable for any car with a propensity for rust.

This ’95 looks quite clean, with around 150,000 miles under the seemingly-rust-free body. The dealer only offers three photos, so I’d insist on more photos and/or a third-party inspection before winging it to Idaho. This is a no-frills, take the family anywhere machine, unlike the modern cute-utes which wince at the suggestion of gravel.

I miss my Nissan. It never let me down (let’s forget about the better half for a moment), and carried everything I threw at it. It even hauled a dead Mazda RX-7 a couple hundred miles on a heavy trailer with no complaints. I wouldn’t try that with a modern CVT-equipped equivalent.

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Mike Mike on Aug 27, 2015

    I had a '91 SE for a few years. I loved the fuel economy. Not that it was great, but that it was absolutely consistent. Driving around town? 19 MPG. 1,600 mile road trip? 19 MPG. Stop and go urban traffic? 19 MPG. Tough as nails too. My Pathy's previous owner had cross-threaded and stripped the head with the #6 spark plug, which is easy to do in the engine due to the layout. I bounced over a speed bump, the plug popped out and suddenly the engine went all helicoptery. I had to drive it for a week like this because I couldn't afford a fix. I finally was able to take it to a shop and got a reduced hourly rate because I helped. We HeliCoiled the head and it ran fine for another 3 years and 25k miles. I sold it for $2500 to a high school kid. Used the money to buy an '81 Alfa GTV6. I consider that a good trade, even though I miss having a dead reliable beater truck around.

  • Brandloyalty Brandloyalty on Aug 28, 2015

    We had a '91 SE for 11 years. 5-speed manual. I kept the frame flushed out and had a spray rust treatement done regularly. The frame stayed solid. So when I sold it in 2006, I got $4500 for it. I also spent hours keeping the rust at bay under the back seat, in various bits of the front end, and in the rear lower corners of the rear door openings. The white paint was tough like enamel. The design lived on as the first generation X-Terra, with the main change being the X-Terra used the rear leaf suspension from the pickup rather than the Pathfinder's sophisticated 5-link rear suspension. I recall our Pathfinder had front OR rear ABS. Brake bias device also. Beautiful red cloth interior (the SE got leather later) with the most plush carpeting and mats I've ever seen. It had the adjustable shocks, which never wore out and which worked very well to give the ride needed for various conditions. The SE also came with a rear lsd differential. The low range, excellent clearance and skid plates made it ideal for off-roading. The front torsion bar suspension allowed mounting the engine very low, aiding stability. It was better than the peer 4-Runner, which suffered from rust, malfunctioning tailgate window, a narrow cabin and a dangerously high center of gravity. I've seen far many of those 4-Runners with the rubber side up. For those smart enough to figure this out, the Pathfinder was a great purchase compared to the prices driven up for the 4-Runner by mindless Toyota fans. But, on the downside was the absence of means to drive in 4wd on dry pavement. This was dangerous on roads with mixed ice and bare patches, and the thing was basically unstable in bad highway conditions. The otherwise excellent engine had a bad habit of breaking manifold studs. The so-called bumpers were laughably flimsy trim bits. We replaced the Pathfinder with the incoming 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara, which, although far less rugged, still had a low range and was a much safer vehicle. Incredibly cheapo carpet and mats though.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next