Arrested for DUI, Woman's Probation Becomes Nightmare

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole
We’re committed to finding, researching, and recommending the best products. We earn commissions from purchases you make using links in our articles. Learn more here

Over the weekend, the New York Times detailed the story of a black woman in Baltimore who, 18 months after being arrested for driving with a blood-alcohol level of .09, has endured more than a year of unusually stiff penalties and harsh treatment.

The story highlights the tale of 40-year-old Donyelle Hall who had a clean criminal record before her arrest on Christmas Day 2013 for drunken driving. After her arrest, the woman was forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars in attorney and court costs, spend more than a month in jail and lost her job. Monthly probation costs for the woman were $385 a month alone.

The story outlines some of the inconsistencies among DUI enforcement from state-to-state — and even judge-to-judge. According to research by WalletHub, DUI laws can vary dramatically between states from a mandatory 10-day jail sentence and 90-day license suspension in Arizona to no mandatory jail time and no license suspension in South Dakota. A 2010 West Virginia case found that officers could issue a DUI and suspend a person’s license even if authorities couldn’t specifically prove that the person was driving.

According to Hall, officers wrongly said she and her husband resisted the officer’s commands and that she closed her eyes during her field sobriety test. When she was taken to jail, the Hall failed to provide a sufficient breathalyzer sample three times because of the 5-foot-tall woman’s lung capacity before she failed the fourth test.

Her .09 observed blood-alcohol level was over the .07 threshold in Maryland, but the story notes that for a woman of her weight and size, the difference between .06 and .09 would have been one glass of wine in a four-hour period.

In addition to highlighting inequities and shortcomings in the American probation system, the story also addresses how discretionary sentencing can vary from judge to judge. Hall said she had to appear in court five times to explain why she was forced to move “around the corner” after her apartment was infested with mice. Initially the judge denied her request to move, and eventually Hall didn’t move anyway.

According to NHTSA, drivers with blood-alcohol levels between .08 and .10 are 11 times more likely to crash than drivers with no alcohol in their bodies.

Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Join the conversation
2 of 88 comments
  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Aug 04, 2015

    "the woman was forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars in attorney and court costs" This doesn't sound right to me, upon first reaction. Public defenders are free. --- "Monthly probation costs for the woman were $385 a month alone." Oh really? Hand me my wallet to my hand. "Initially the judge denied her request to move, and eventually Hall didn’t move anyway." Huh? This article really needs some editing.

  • Frylock350 Frylock350 on Aug 05, 2015

    This lady got several books thrown and her and I feel nothing. I'm certainly biased; I've lost a loved one to a drunk driver. Here's the thing about DWI and why I feel zero sympathy: its 100% preventable. If you are going to drink, do not drive. It couldn't be easier. If you can't arrange a ride, guess what you don't get to drink. People's responses here are also a reflection of how deeply engrained alcohol use is our culture. Its almost as if a large portion of the US population is incapable of having an evening out with zero alcohol use. I know people like that, they can't have a coke or a water, they "need" something alcoholic to drink. Get a designated driver, hire a taxi/uber or drink a coke. Can't deal with that and you pay the consequences. Hopefully its just a pile of money you owe and maybe some jail time and it isn't living with killing someones mother, father, son, daughter, wife or husband.

  • Marty S Corey, thanks for your comment. Mercedes has many different models, and will survive. Jaguar is planning on only offering electric models and will be in trouble. They should continue their ICE models as long as possible, but have discontinued the F-Type already and will probably be discontinuing everything else. We purchased the current XF this year, which is a nice car, but would have been splendid if they had just continued the supercharged V-6 in it.By the way, I have really enjoyed your Continental and Eldorado series. Was just showing it to my barber, who owned several 1954-56 Eldorado convertibles.
  • Marques My father had one of these. A black 1984 Pulsar NX with a 5-speed stick and a grey interior. Dad always kept it in pristine shape-that black paint was shiny even in the middle of the night. I swear I could still smell the Rain Dance carnauba wax! The only issue that car ever had was that it was never driven enough-it would sit for 10 days at a time! The Hitachi carburetor on it(and other Nissans of the time) were known to be troublesome. It went to the boneyard at 72K miles when a hole got punched in the block. By that time the Pulsar had long ceased production.
  • VoGhost This is the only new vehicle I have the slightest interest in.
  • VoGhost I love it. Can't wait to get one. Finally, trucks are becoming actually capable, and it's great for America.
  • Peter Just waiting for Dr. Who to show up with his Tardis, and send these things back to the hellish dark dimension from which they came.