No, Replacing the Flag on Bubba Watson's General Lee is Not Like Painting a Mustache on the Mona Lisa

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

Getting caught up in the current controversy over the Confederate battle flag, pro golfer Bubba Watson has announced that he’s going to paint over the Army of Northern Virginia’s flag on the roof of the authentic Dukes of Hazard General Lee Dodge Charger that he owns, and replace it with the stars and stripes of the American flag. I have no desire to rehash the controversy over the Confederate battle flag, but I do want to address an opinion that I’ve seen raised in comments about Watson’s decision.

A number of people have suggested that because Watson’s car is an authentic vehicle that was used in filming the television series, painting over the flag would degrade the car’s value as a collectible. From what I know about TV cars in general and about the history of the cars used in filming the Dukes of Hazzard show, that’s not likely. From what I know about collectible cars, even if Watson does repaint it, that might actually increase its value.

Watson’s car is historically significant as TV and movie cars go and not just because it was one of the 300 or so Chargers used to film the series. Watson’s car was the actual vehicle used to film the signature car jump seen every episode in the show’s opening credits. It was also labeled General Lee #1 by the production team (or should that be 01 The landing for that jump wasn’t exactly soft. The car was wrecked and disposed of by the studio, eventually sitting in an Atlanta area junkyard for more than two decades before an Indianapolis based Dukes of Hazzard fan bought and restored it. Watson acquired it for $110,000 at a Barrett-Jackson auction in 2012.

Bubba Watson tweeted out this photo when he bought his General Lee

Because of its use in that scene, it’s probably one of the two most valuable General Lees out of the 17 that have survived — the other valuable Charger being the “hero car” used in shooting scenes with the human stars of the show, which we featured at TTAC recently.

Besides the monetary value, there’s the car’s value as a cultural artifact. Some see painting over the flag as akin to painting a mustache on the Mona Lisa. That level of hyperbole aside, the thing is that I like the idea of property rights. If you owned the Mona Lisa and wanted to paint a mustache on it, I might call you a cultural philistine, but it’s your painting to preserve or deface at your will. The General Lee is Watson’s to do with what he wants.

Getting back to dollars and cents, I don’t think Watson would be doing any sort of damage to the car or its value by putting a different flag on it. As mentioned above, the car was wrecked in the filming of the show and later restored in Indianapolis. The flag that’s currently on Watson’s car was not painted by the shop in California that made the first handful of General Lees for Warner Bros. It was painted during the restoration. It’s not an original artifact.

As the saying goes, it’s only original once. A corollary is that once it’s no longer original, changing it is usually no big thing.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Illinois farmer John Grafelman, who may have the coolest barn find ever. He found designer Larry Shinoda’s personal Boss 302 Mustang prototype, used as both a styling prototype and development car for Ford’s Trans Am racing program, in his own barn. Grafelman had bought it many years earlier in the 1970s but didn’t find out what it really was until relatively recently, when he began an extensive restoration that was just completed last year.

One of the 1969 Boss 302 Mustang’s signature styling elements are the C-shaped stripes that adorn the car’s flanks. On the production cars, the stripe was applied with a then new 3M film that reflected light at night. The prototype stripes, though, were painted, and when I spoke with Grafelman I asked him how he could have “restored” something that historical, effectively destroying it. John showed me archival photos from Ford’s styling studio that showed how the car had a number of iterations of the stripe with different lettering: SR2 (the model’s original internal designation), BOSS, and 302, before settling on the production car’s BOSS 302. When Grafelman bought the car, the stripe was solid black, with no lettering at all. He decided to restore it to how it looked in the studio, with just BOSS.

Just as John Grafelman didn’t degrade the value of his one of a kind vehicle by repainting stripes that had already been repainted a few times, neither would Bubba Watson devalue his General Lee by putting an American Flag on it. Like with the first restoration, it could always be brought back to look original.

If anything, should Watson go through with his plans to repaint the roof of his car, he might actually increase its value by adding to General Lee 1’s story. It’s a funny thing about original vs custom. It often depends on who is doing the customization. I wouldn’t let George Barris touch any car I owned, but I’m pretty sure than any “customization” George does to a car most likely increases its value. The flat screen video screens he put in the back of the Monkeemobile didn’t keep it from fetching more than $300K at auction.

The same would likely be true if Watson puts the Stars and Stripes on his General Lee (historical note: the real General Robert E. Lee served under the U.S. flag prior to the Civil War, so while a General Lee with an American flag might not be historically accurate to the TV series, it would have some historical basis). It certainly wouldn’t degrade the value of the car as a collectible. Regardless of which flag is on the car, neither would be original. Watson could replace the General Lee’s orange with pink in support of breast cancer research and it wouldn’t decrease the value of the car. He could replace the flag on the roof with the black nationalist red, green and black flag, or with a gay-friendly rainbow flag and neither would decrease the value of the car as a collectible.

It’s only original once.

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can get a parallax view at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options. Thanks for reading – RJS

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 199 comments
  • Maymar Maymar on Jul 11, 2015

    Even as a godless commie liberal who's more or less visually repulsed by the Confederate flag, somehow the General Lee seems benign, completely removed from any meaning. Not that I care about it being removed from any non-governmental setting (I just subscribe to John Oliver belief that it's a great way to identify people I don't want to talk to. However, if you want to really get invested in an 80's TV car, I put forth the A-Team van. It's much less loaded with controversial symbolism, but they're still rebels on the run from the government, so you know, you can have a problem with The Man and still get behind them. They're also former soldiers, for that whole patriot angle. Unlike the General Lee, no one's bothered by anyone modding or ruining an old G-Series van (but it does look rather bitchin' properly done up). Or, hell, just paint B.A. Baracus on the roof of the General Lee!

  • Jimbob457 Jimbob457 on Jul 13, 2015

    I was taught to respect the Battle Flag - the Stars and Bars. Three of my great uncles died fighting for the Lost Cause. I was also taught not to refight the War for Southern Independence. That would be bad for business. Then the Battle Flag symbol was hijacked by the Segs. Recently a low rent mad dog racist tried to revive it one more time. Hoorah for Bubba Watson! Make a statement for sanity. You might want to paint over with something that is easy to remove. Who knows? Maybe we hijack our symbol back, someday?

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next