Volvo Unveils New Drive-E Three-Cylinder

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

Volvo unveiled its new Drive-E three-cylinder engine Thursday, with prototype testing already underway.

The engine was developed in-house, and is considered “a natural next step in Volvo’s strategy of downsizing.” Horsepower and torque are unknown at this time.

Per powertrain vice president Michael Fleiss, the new Drive-E is being developed alongside Volvo’s CMA architecture, and will also power Volvo’s 60 Series with a little help from turbocharging. R&D senior vice president Dr. Peter Mertens adds the engine “can be built on the same production lines” as the four-cylinder Drive-E engines, providing “flexible production potential” as needed.




Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 19 comments
  • Carguy67 Carguy67 on Dec 12, 2014

    Don't tell me those are rubber hoses clamped to rigid pipes right next to the exhaust manifold? A single exhaust port for 3 cylinders ... is that a good thing?

    • Heavy handle Heavy handle on Dec 12, 2014

      I think that the exhaust manifold is cast into the cylinder head (and liquid cooled). That's a common feature for many new engines. The single exhaust port that you see is after the manifold and goes to the exhaust turbine.

  • Zamoti Zamoti on Dec 12, 2014

    We're Volvo and we do whatever the hell we want! Rwd brown diesel station wagon manual, did that. 5 cylinder transverse mount turbo awd? Did that. Adding a supercharger to a pair of turbos? Why the hell not. Tiny 3 cyl in a 4000 lb car? Damn right. They may not be known for their engines but they sure got balls for making some of the strangest ones around.

    • See 1 previous
    • Tostik Tostik on Dec 13, 2014

      @wmba And let's not forget, Volvo will soon be making a 450HP 4-banger. It'll be in Volvos fairly quickly. I can't wait. http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2014/10/volvo-goes-death-metal-triple-turbo-two-liter-four/

  • Scott Did they start at Clarkson's Farm? (No other questions matter...)
  • Carfan94 According to Wikipedia the Highlander went into production in November 2000. Inaccuracy much?
  • MaintenanceCosts I have a 2016 with the late and very much missed V6 hybrid powertrain. It’s as interesting to drive as a toaster, but I can’t deny that it just does everything we want it to do without ever complaining, despite relentless neglect (at least cosmetic neglect; it’s well maintained mechanically). It’s perfectly happy taking the kids to school or carrying all of us and our luggage over 10,000-foot passes at 85 mph. Very fit for purpose.
  • Bd2 Santa Fe is so much better because its Hyundai
  • 28-Cars-Later M'eh. The Toyota Harrier is really what got the fail going in 1998, this was merely the Toyota equivalent using it's US platform and operations. This and the Harrier by themselves I don't think are bad per se, but variety is the spice of life and we lost that a while back in car choices *because* of this and the Harrier.
Next