Junkyard Find: 1978 Dodge Ramcharger

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Even though Denver wrecking yards are always full of old trucks, the Dodge Ramcharger isn’t quite as common as its GM, Ford, and Jeep rivals. In fact, this Royal SE ’83 Ramcharger is the only example we’ve seen in this series, prior to today’s find. This tan Dodge is every bit as Malaise-y as the yellow ’76 Wagoneer we saw last month, so let’s look at these photos and imagine what it was like driving a 9 MPG truck during a period of high inflation and steep gas prices.

Tan with brown and orange stripes. I think the library— wait, I mean “media center”— in my junior high school was done up in very similar colors, back in 1979.

You don’t want to know what kind of horsepower the 318 (or 360) made in 1978. The torque was enough, let’s leave it at that.

At least it has a real transmission.

You don’t see many of these engine-coolant heaters these days.

It’s a bit rusty, but probably still had some life left.


An all-around family car!







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 33 comments
  • Jim brewer Jim brewer on Dec 04, 2013

    I bought a 1989 new and kept it for almost twenty years. They upgraded the 318 that year with the Magnum. I think it had 180 hp. The roll bar is factory, because I ordered one. (I ordered it less than a month after seeing two separate fatal accidents about fifteen miles apart claiming four lives on the infamous US 666). They were careful to call it a sport bar for liability reasons, although it was bolted to the frame. They were kind of a cosmetic affectation back in the 1970's, sort of like fog lights. I had the manual An old Dodge Ramcharger in double low four wheel drive is an awesome thing. The original full time four wheel drive was quite problematic. Mine could engage in high range at highway speeds which was kind of surprising in those days, and handy for snow. Dodge did 4X4 before it was cool. The suspension was primitive even for the late 1980s. The thing got around 14-15 mpg, but I think that was before ethanol was prevalent. I bought it because the S-10 Blazers and Bronco IIs were wildly popular back then, (hard to believe, I know) and Chrysler had nothing to compete. So they discounted the Ramcharger as a Ramcharger 100 built in their excellent Lago Alberto plant in Mexico. It only cost $13,500, and I had limited slip, the sport bar, heavy duty alternator and I believe skid plates. It was nice looking, too. Better than a Bronco and at least the equal of a full size Blazer.

    • See 1 previous
    • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Dec 07, 2013

      Yes, S-10 Blazers and Bronco II's were quite popular back then. Chrysler was supposed to build a SUV version of the Dakota but ended up selling a rebadged 2 dr version of the Mitsubishi Montero, the Raider. Additionally the purchase of the Jeep division and models like the TJ would have Chrysler competing against itself.

  • Allan850glt Allan850glt on Feb 25, 2014

    Back in the early '80s my parents had one of these, a black '78, 360 auto, air, FM, funhouse-red vinyl interior (what little wasn't black painted metal), lots of red pinstripes with dips and swirls and big white "wagon wheels" with equally big white letter tires. This, along with a early '70s Scout (orange) made up our "winter vehicle squad" living in snowy/salty suburban Buffalo and nice weather cars consisting of a '74 Roadrunner and '75 Camaro type LT. The Ramcharger was acquired in '81 and after the first year it was a total bucket. The weather sure took its toll on the floorboards and eventually the doors went swiss-cheesesque as well. It rattled and banged and the heat was far from adequate but it did get through anything that Lake Erie and Lake Ontario threw us weatherwise...as long as it was frozen! Damp days made starting almost an exercise in futility. Once running it had a nasty tendency to die and not start back up. Rain, no Ramcharger. Damp days, no Ramcharger. My dad, uncles, our mechanic, nobody couldn't chase down whatever it was. There were many days where she'd sit dormant due to wet Buffalo conditions and either the Camaro would come out or we'd borrow Gram's Aspen. Eventually my dad had enough after a few years of dumping cash to no avail and bought himself a new '86 Accord which was leaps and bounds ahead of this awful SUV, if you can really call it that.

  • SilverCoupe Tim, you don't always watch F1 as you don't want to lose sleep? But these races are great for putting one to sleep!I kid (sort of). I DVR them, I watch them, I fast forward a lot. It was great to see Lando win one, I've been a fan of McLaren since their heyday in CanAm in the late '60's.
  • Cprescott The problem with this fable by the FTC is:(1) shipping of all kinds was hindered at ports because of COVID related issues;(2) The President shafted the Saudis by insulting them with a fist bump that torqued them off to no end;(3) Saudis announced unilateral production cuts repeatedly during this President's tenure even as he begged to get them to produce more;(4) We were told that we had record domestic production so that would have lowered prices due to increased supply(5) The President emptied the strategic petroleum reserve to the lowest point since the 1980's due to number 3 and then sold much of that to China.We have repeatedly been told that documents and emails are Russian disinformation so why now are we to believe this?
  • Ollicat Another Biden attempt to say, "Look over there!"
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Who cares. Price of gas is not the issue. spending an extra 100$ a month over 4 tanks of gas is not the issue.this a political scam to distract really dumb people from the real issue. if rent and house payments were not up by 50% to as high as 150% higher in a ton of locations, then paying an extra 100$ in gas would be annoying but not really an issue. But the real-estate market with hedge fund investors, power-relator groups bought a ton of houses and flipped them into rentals and jacked up the rates uplifting the costs on everything else. and ironically no-one seems to be in any hurry to build more houses to bring those costs down because supply and demand means keeping less houses available to charge as much as you want. It is also not the issue as a secondary issue is child care costs and medical... again 100$ extra per month in gas is *nothing* compared to 800$ a month in ''child care'' and 300$ per visit to the doctor office, 300$ for a procedure less dentist trip..
  • Ajla Is there something proprietary or installed on the moon with these that I'm not aware of?
Next