Bark's Bites: The Chevrolet SS Is Embarrassing Itself At A Dealer Near You

Mark "Bark M." Baruth
by Mark "Bark M." Baruth

The Chevrolet SS arrived at Chevrolet dealerships all over America last week. Did you notice?



A quick trip to www.chevrolet.com reveals no mention of the brand’s flagship sedan anywhere on the three-page main page slideshow. Bizarrely, it doesn’t even appear under the “Cars” dropdown — I had to click on “Performance” to find it, where its starting price of only seven grand less than a real, live, honest-to-God C7 Corvette is regrettably highlighted.

Chevrolet had a massive, massive ad buy this weekend on both CBS and Fox during the NFL schedule. Surely the SS was featured there, right? Nope — it was all about the Black Friday sale on Cruzes, Malibus, Equinoxes, and Traverses. Nary an SS to be found.

As a former Pontiac G8 GT owner, I saw a few “OMG ITS HERE” SS showroom photos popping up on the G8 owners’ Facebook groups to which I still subscribe. The car looks no better in the showroom than it did in the original press photos, sadly. If anything, it looks worse. The SS is even less visually impressive when compared to its new stablemate, the 2014 Impala. One pities the poor Chevy salesman who has to try to explain the MSRP on the window to the customer his sales manager has insisted he try to upsell to the certain Showroom Poison known as the SS.

“I like this one-how much is it?”

“It starts at right around $44,000, sir.”

“FORTY-FOUR FREAKING THOUSAND DOLLARS?? FOR A CHEVY??”

“Yes, but it has a V8 and—“

“FOR THAT MUCH MONEY I COULD HAVE A CADILLAC! ARE YOU INSANE??”

*The salesperson tries very hard not to look at the CTS further down the Chevy-Buick-Cadillac-GMC showroom*


“Sir, this is a performance sedan.”

“Is that right? Is that why I can’t even order it with a manual transmission?”

“Uhh… how about we finish up the paperwork on that Impala, sir?”

Unfortunately, GM appears to have learned absolutely, positively nothing since the launch of their last gussied-up Holden Commodore. The G8 GT had a cool, Spy Hunter-themed ad and a great tagline: the most powerful car under $30,000. The main thrust of the SS ad campaign appears to have been putting the incredibly un-memorable name of the car on the grille of Jimmie Johnson’s car — keeping in mind, of course, that according to NASCAR, only 15% of NASCAR fans earn more than $100,000 per year. Not exactly the best audience for a car that runs about half a hundo.

The G8 GXP, at least, had a reputation as a killer performance sedan. So, naturally, GM mated the SS’s LS3 to an automatic transmission that makes the SS slower in every way than the GXP was, not even cracking the five-second zero-to-sixty barrier in most tests. Combine unimpressive performance digits with rental-car looks and you’ve got a floorplan anchor for any Chevy dealer unlucky enough to have one allocated to him.

All of this would be bad enough if the competition had been standing still since 2009 when the last G8 GXP was sold. They haven’t been. The main antagonist, Dodge’s SRT-8 Charger, now stuffs a 6.4 liter Hemi under the hood of a much more visually compelling package, whomping out 470 horsepower and screaming from zero-to-sixty nearly a full second faster than the SS. Extend that distance to a quarter mile, and the SS fares no better — 13.5 for the SS versus 12.6 for the Charger. It’s hard to see anybody but a true Bowtie fanatic opting for the SS over the SRT.

What does the future hold for the big GM Performance sedan? Take a quick look on third-party classified sites, where dealers are already advertising prices three to four thousand dollars beneath MSRP for a car that was just released last week. Compare that to another new for 2014 model, the Mercedes-Benz CLA, which dealers can’t keep on the lot at MSRP and above. Apples to oranges, yes, but just look at the difference in the advertising strategy. Super Bowl ads, Kate Upton, Willem Dafoe for the baby-baby Merc. For the Big Chevy? Nada.

I’d love to have the chance to have a candid, off-the-record conversation with somebody, hell, anybody at GM about what the thought process was behind the SS. Are they just trying to spread out the Commodore R&D budget? Is this some empty suit’s crusade? Why has there been NO advertising push behind this car? Are they so afraid to fail on a grand scale that they’ve decided to do the automotive equivalent of a direct-to-video release?

Believe me, as a former G8 owner, I want this car to succeed. Apparently, I want it to succeed even more than GM does. Unfortunately, I don’t have too much to say about the matter. When the biggest Bowtie sedan disappears from showrooms at the beginning of the 2015 model year, I doubt anyone will even notice.

Mark "Bark M." Baruth
Mark "Bark M." Baruth

More by Mark "Bark M." Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 202 comments
  • 84Cressida 84Cressida on Nov 26, 2013

    This car is the perfect example why automakers should flat out ignore enthusiasts and their claims of what they should build. If I'm wanting a GM vehicle of this type, why would I spend that much money on a Chevy when I can get a Cadillac for similar coin? I'd love for Toyota to bring back the Cressida as a halo RWD sedan in the Toyota lineup, but they would have to be completely out of their mind to do that as it would interfere with Lexus. People forget that Chrysler can sell the SRT 300s and Chargers because there is no luxury brand to step on. Ford could probably get away with it since Lincoln is such a mess. Unless GM plans on nuking Cadillac, this car at its price point makes no sense. Price it lower and then you have it going against the Impala, and one could argue that car already has enough competition from within in the form of the Lacrosse. This car will not last more than two years.

  • Inodes Inodes on Feb 18, 2014

    It's very easy to palm the SS off as a slight update to the G8, but it's anything but. It's more than a 90% revision, with the only thing being retained visually being the doors and some switchgear. Here in Australia, even the car magazines were thinking it was "same old". The largest Australian car award (and longest running worldwide - Wheels Magazine), almost denied judging the car this year for a criteria stating = "must be significantly different from the previous model". At first glance, it was a minor upgrade. Going beneath the surface though, the noted how massively different it was. Then they drove it. Apart from almost winning this year's award (it took the seriously good Golf VII to deny it), the writers said it was a shame that GM Holden was closing shop. This model was said to be several generations of improvement over previous model that lent itself to the G8.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next