Chancery Judge Rejects Fiat's Valuation of UAW VEBA's Chrysler Shares, Merger Delayed

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Sergio Marchionne’s plans to merge Chrysler and Fiat have been delayed because Fiat failed to convince a Delaware Chancery Court judge to set the value of Chrysler stock owned by the UAW’s health care fund known as VEBA. Judge Donald Parsons rejected Fiat’s request to find that a call-option agreement covering at least 54,000 Chrysler shares valued the stock at slightly less than $140 million. That decision means that the dispute over the shares’ value will now proceed to trial.

According to Bloomberg Judge Parsons ruled that Fiat officials haven’t shown the union fund “is required to deliver the shares in return for Fiat’s payment of $139.7 million. It would be premature for me to enter an order requiring” VEBA to turn the stock over to Fiat.

The decision may in fact encourage the two parties to settle the dispute, now about a year old, out of court.

The court’s decision may push Fiat and the union’s trust to find an agreement on the shares and end the dispute over the value of the holdings that’s gone on for about a year. Analysts estimate that when that agreement is eventually made, it will cost Fiat about $4 billion to take full control of the Auburn Hills automaker.

Fiat now owns 58.5 percent of Chrysler. The UAW healthcare fund came out of Chrysler’s bankruptcy owning the remaining 41.5% of the company in exchange for the union taking on the responsibility of Chrysler UAW retirees’ health care. Those responsibilities had made the UAW one of pre-bankruptcy Chrysler’s largest creditors.

Fiat puts the value of the first tranche of available union shares at ~$140 million, about $200 million shy of the UAW trust’s valuation. On the UAW’s full stake, the difference could be as much as a billion dollars. Hence the parties’ presence in Delaware Chancery Court.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Aug 01, 2013

    I'm surprised Fiat even tried this, given that call-options are just that, OPTIONS - not a mandatory order to turn the shares over.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Aug 01, 2013

      Sergio doesn't have an extra $billion lying around, so he'll try anything to stretch what he has to cover the key part of the merger. He's done very well so far paying lowball prices for assets, so you can't blame him for trying.

  • Thanh_n Thanh_n on Aug 02, 2013

    I admit I'm unfamiliar with stocks and whatnot. I'm wondering couldn't Fiat allow the union trust to keep the 41.5%. That way, it'd be in the best interest of both parties to cooperate on future endeavors.

    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Aug 02, 2013

      Monies in a UAW trust would benefit only the UAW workers. The money is essentially locked away in a trust - not what Chrysler wants to do with a big piece of their cash.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X At the taxpayers expense, as usual.
  • Danddd Or just get a CX5 or 50 instead.
  • Groza George My next car will be a PHEV truck if I can find one I like. I travel a lot for work and the only way I would get a full EV is if hotels and corporate housing all have charging stations.I would really like a Toyota Tacoma or Nissan Frontier PHEV
  • Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
Next