EU To Germany: Use The Explosive, Toxic Stuff, Or Else

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Brussels set the German government an ultimatum: Force automakers to use the R1234yf, or we’ll see you in court. Germany has 10 weeks to answer, writes Der Spiegel, before the EU will file charges.

German carmakers, notably Daimler, refuse to use the R1234yf, refrigerant. They say the new stuff is highly flammable, and when it burns, it produces toxic gases that would violate the Chemical Weapons Convention, would the burning car be used in warfare.

Germany’s Kraftfahrtbundesamt will conduct a series of crash-tests with cars of various makers. Brussels is unlikely to receive an answer before these tests are concluded.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
11 of 36 comments
  • OldWingGuy OldWingGuy on Jun 14, 2013

    Many years ago (still R12 days, I expect), a buddy and I were pulling into work and a co-workers car was on fire. We pried open the hood and put the fire out. On the way in, I noticed a couple of the local volunteer fire dept fellows standing at the window watching. When I asked why they didn't come out to help, they said when Freon (R12) burns it creates phosgene gas (from WW1 chemical warefare days). So they were trained to just let cars burn themselves out. I'm not sure if any of that is true, but I did thank them for not coming out and stopping us... I realize that R12 is no longer available, and I have no idea if R134a or R-whatever is nasty when it burns. Either way, I can't afford a German car, so I don't think I will be too impacted by this.

    • See 6 previous
    • KrisZ KrisZ on Jun 16, 2013

      @Number6 You should use your imagination. The problem is not the windshield, but human skin. If the windshield can get etched, it doesn't take a genius to see what will happen when this stuff contacts human skin. That's what got MB concerned.

  • Joe K Joe K on Jun 14, 2013

    Do they not have personal injury lawyers in europe?

    • See 1 previous
    • Ash78 Ash78 on Jun 17, 2013

      @krhodes1 I never thought I'd read that last sentence, but it's actually true. The confusion comes with European governments, which are considered more intrusive than in the US. Americans counteract this -- for better or worse -- with a very loose legal system that allows frivolous lawsuits that can be brought against others with impunity. Pick your poison: Expensive, excessive government or greedy, unrestricted lawyers.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next