Jeep Compass' Segment-Leading Capability Vs Jeep Patriot's Segment-Leading Capability

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

The decision by former Chrysler design chief Trevor Creed, approved by the company’s product planners and subsequently reaffirmed by Sergio Marchionne and his team of Fiat managers, to produce two compact Jeep SUVs, the Compass and the Patriot, has always confused me. Why spend money developing two different cars based on the same platform for the same market segment? Wouldn’t it make more sense to make one good car instead of two not quite as good cars?

Of course in the corporate mind at Chrysler, the Compass and the Patriot were not really supposed to compete with each other. The Patriot was supposed to be a compact Jeep for traditional Jeep owners, with styling derived from the XJ Cherokee. The Compass was supposed to be the compact Jeep for women people who’d never consider buying a Jeep. It had rounder, softer shapes, and was the first Jeep to be sold that could not be bought in a configuration that would earn it Jeep’s coveted “Trail Rated” branding.

Both Jeeplets have gotten their poorly received original interiors upgraded as Chrysler has renewed its product line coming out of its bankruptcy and just last month at the 2013 NAIAS Chrysler introduced the restyled 2014 Compass, touting it as “the Most Capable Compact SUV” having “Segment-leading capability”. So where does that leave the Patriot? I guess the product planners and marketers in Auburn Hills are slicing the marketing segment salami paper thin because at the same time that Chrysler was publishing the press release about the new Compass, it was also releasing one about the 2014 Jeep Patriot, with “Benchmark Compact-SUV Capability” with “Segment-leading capability”.

Does that mean that the Compass is more “capable” than the Patriot? Is the Patriot the “benchmark” for the Compass? And just which segments are each of them leading. Both cars feature a new six-speed automatic, both cars are now available with Jeep’s Freedom Drive I 4×4 package and both can be equipped in Trail Rated form with Jeep’s Freedom Drive II 4×4 Off-road Package. The Compass’ original raison d’etre was selling Jeeps to people that would never take them off pavement. Now that both cars are equally capable, and segment-leading capable at that, what’s the point of selling both of them? Sergio’s no dummy so selling both cars may make more money than just one of them, but I still can’t help but think what a Patriot with twice the development money behind it would be like.

Ya think there’s some cutting and pasting going on in Auburn Hills?Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, a realistic perspective on cars & car culture and the original 3D car site. If you found this post worthwhile, you can dig deeper at Cars In Depth. If the 3D thing freaks you out, don’t worry, all the photo and video players in use at the site have mono options. Thanks for reading – RJS

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 23 comments
  • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Feb 24, 2013

    The Patriot has been pretty decently reviewed since the interior and sound deadening was improved. The Compass was well reviewed for its foul weather capability in a C&D test that pitted it against cars like the AWD Mini. Each has its place. Honestly I'd pick the Patriot for its styling and if I had a capable 4x4 vehicle I'd start looking for places to use it.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Feb 24, 2013

      Uh-oh. If you had a Ferrari 458 Italia with 562 horsepower, you'd start looking for places to use it too?

  • Webtiger Webtiger on Jul 10, 2013

    As an owner of a 2008 Compass I have to say I liked the idea they had for the car The execution however, was a joke.. It's noisy as hell on the highway, anything above 2500 RPM and it sounds like an angry drunken bee... The interior is like rock .. ugh to the Caliber hard plastic look. Love the seats.. the truly only redeeming quality of the car... It can get decent gas mileage but again, over 2200 RPM and you start a quick loss in MPG's... It does turn on and stop on the proverbial dime but it's not enough for me to keep it beyond next month when I take delivery on my Dart GT. Too bad they put the 6 sp auto in the 2014... 3 years too late IMHO..

  • Jkross22 Tens of people will be disappointed.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Basically a Qashqai/Rogue Sport that looks like the new Rogue, but with the Kicks name.
  • Fred I guess this also competes with the Honda HR-V. I'm driving a 2021 and this offers a few improvements, hopefully the driver assists work better, bigger screen, maybe nicer seats. I trust Honda more than Nissan for reliability. I'd miss the magic seats. And then there is the extra $5000 or so it would cost me.
  • Arthur Dailey 143 different interior options! I realize that is now untennable, but still would like more options regarding interior colours, including the instrument panels/dashboards. Black on black is depressing. Drum brakes and no HVAC system. And yet we have 'young whippersnappers' complaining about some modern vehicles being 'penalty boxes'. Try driving a family around in a 1960's stripped VW Beetle during a Canadian winter and then you can start talking about penalty boxes. ;-)Personally that final picture of the red coloured car with the 3/4 view shows it to be just beautifully proportioned. Still retains the P-38 styling finishing in those attractive vertical tail lights. And the horizontal chrome trim along the bottom of the trunk lid adds a nice touch.
  • Jeff Nice to see a more affordable vehicle. For the price it is a lot of vehicle for the money. Dodge needs a vehicle like this.
Next