$29 Billion, Net: Volkswagen Declares Record Profit

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Winterkorn gets honorary PhD. He deserves it

Despite a severe contraction of its European home market, Volkswagen today announced record earnings for 2012. The group delivered an after tax profit of €21.9 billion ($28.9 billion) up from €15.8 billion ($20.9 billion) in the preceding year.

The after tax result “includes the clearly positive effects from the final measurement of the put/call rights relating to Porsche as of July 31, 2012,” as Volkswagen says. However, an operating profit of €11.5 billion ($15.2 billion) isn’t half bad. Insiders expected a hit on the operating results due to alleged predatory dumping in Europe, but it wasn’t the case.

Maybe it was. Sales rose from €159.3 billion ($210.5) in 2011 to €192.7 billion ($254.6) in 2012. The operating profit on the other hand remained relatively flat, going from €11.3 billion in 2011 to €11.5 billion in 2012. As long as you can afford being a predator, go for it.

What is even more interesting is the guidance Volkswagen gave today: “Given the pressures resulting from the difficult environment the Volkswagen Group’s goal for operating profit is to match the prior-year level in 2013. Deliveries to customers and sales revenue are to increase year-on-year.“

January – December20122011+/- (%)Volkswagen Group (IFRSs):Deliveries to customers‘000 units9,2768,26512.2Vehicle sales‘000 units9,3458,36111.8Production‘000 units9,2558,4949EmployeesDec. 31549,763501,9569.5Sales revenueEUR million192,676159,33720.9Operating profitEUR million11,51011,2712.1Profit before taxEUR million25,49218,92634.7Profit after taxEUR million21,88415,79938.5Noncontrolling interestsEUR million168391-57Profit attributable to shareholders of Volkswagen AGEUR million21,71715,40940.9
Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • NorthwestT NorthwestT on Feb 22, 2013

    Maybe now those guys can get some suits that fit. And yeah, what Buickman said.

  • JSF22 JSF22 on Feb 24, 2013

    You sure can get a lot of honorary degrees just by saying "yes" to Ferdinand Piech. Which, as it has turned out, has been a pretty good thing for Winterkorn to do. Piech inherited a company that was really only good at creating jobs for Germans and turned it into what is by nearly any measure the most successful automobile manufacturer the world has known, often by building incredibly good cars. If that takes them to the top in volume, great ... but I think we've seen plenty of examples of what chasing volume for its own sake accomplishes.

  • MaintenanceCosts "GLX" with the 2.slow? I'm confused. I thought that during the Mk3 and Mk4 era "GLX" meant the car had a VR6.
  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
Next