Confessions Of A Renegade Car Guy: Why I Take The Bicycle
I drive an American car forum member’s fantasy: a stick-shift diesel wagon. Except that I don’t. I love that car, but it stays in its garage most of the time, unlike its predecessor in New Jersey, which I drove 60 miles a day plus 200 on weekends.
Sure, I could do like most of my colleagues do, and drive the car to work. It’s a 12km (7 miles) commute, some 20 minutes without traffic, 30 minutes on bad days, including the short walk to the parking garage. Half city driving, half highway.
But even though I am more of a car nut than most any of my colleagues, I’m cheaper as well. Since commutes mean a cold engine and higher fuel and oil consumption, and the car has a real world average of 6.3l/100km (37.34MPG) I estimate the fuel consumption at about 2 liters a day. 1.4€ per liter, 21 commutes a month equal 60€ a month in fuel costs. I am not counting tire use, oil, car depreciation, or repairs induced. With that comes the convenience of a variety of radio stations, MP3 player connectivity, he at, and AC.
What’s the alternative? I currently live in Strasbourg, France. Strasbourg is 3km from the German border, and the city shares its love of bicycles with its Northern European neighbors. As much as biking 11km to work is fun, I get quite sweaty doing so, and smelly people are rarely appreciated by their coworkers.
The solution? Combined commuting: 5 minute walk to the tramway, 25 minute tramway ride, followed by 5 minute biking to work. The bike is securely locked in a semi-public shed, and the overall commute time is barely higher than with the car.
The cost? 100€ for a used bike, and 42€ a month for the tram, half of which are covered by the employer, by law. The shed is free with a tram pass. If the bike lasts 2 years, it’s a cost of 25€ a month, 35€ less than the mere fuel costs when using a car.
It even makes owning a car a fairly uninteresting proposition. I considered using the city-sponsored rental program, which is fairly cheap, at about 40€ to register (or 30€ with that tram pass; the city council REALLY wants me to not have my own car), 10€ a month for the subscription, and 2-3€ an hour depending on the vehicle. They have dedicated parking spaces, removing that hassle, with a station near my home. But the cars need to be reserved several days ahead of the rental to ensure they are available, and forums indicate that many renters don’t stick to their alleged schedules. You must have flexibility.
It still is an interesting possibility, except for two critical elements:
Car seats! Having 2 young kids means 2 car seats, and I just can’t imagine lugging them around on foot to rental stations.
Boredom! The available cars are random public rental-sharing program blandmobiles. There are a few Fiat 500s, kind of fun to drive but impractical, but mostly Toyota Aygos, Peugeot 107s, and Prius plug-ins. No way I’m driving those on a week-end trip!
So we’re back to my choice between the composite approach of walk/tram/bike, and the car.
The trams run every 5 minutes during rush hour, so that’s not a problem. Obviously, I have to deal with other commuters directly, in the flesh, something that’s completely anathema for many car commuters. But it often is for the better as that direct eye contact generally ensures far more civility than is usual when there are 2 windshields in the way of direct communication. Teenagers with idevices of course do their best to avoid eye contact and therefore having to give up their seats to pregnant ladies, but there again, nothing a shoulder tap, nod and smile can’t cure. And if nothing else works and somebody insists on getting in the tram before commuters have gotten out, my 6’2 frame and a growl do the trick.
The free newspapers are an added bonus, as is seeing all the lights turn to green when you approach, while hapless motorists must sometimes wait for excessively long periods of time as the rush hour flow of trams streams through the intersection. The trams have their own light system that trumps car traffic lights. Its is not unusual at all for a motorist to wait for 4 trams to drive past, or about 5 minutes…at ONE light. Just imagine if your commute crosses a tram line 4 times, which is not unusual. Biggest real drawback: higher likelihood of catching a cold through involuntary germ exchange, but having 2 kids in daycare means that I get those anyway.
What about the biking part? We’ve all heard horror stories about the dangers of biking and seen hilarious videos of NYC cyclists crashing into obstacles spread in their bike lanes. Not so in Strasbourg, where cars generally take cyclists into account and bike lanes are most often on sidewalks or, even better, separated from both the road and the sidewalk, ensuring a high safety for bikes (and also for pedestrians from bikes, but that’s yet another story). Obviously, in order to ride that bike, one needs to be healthy, have practical clothes (high heels and skirts make it difficult, as do heavily stuffed suitcases or computer shoulder bags) and accept that short compromise on comfort.
I may use the car more during winter, and sometimes drive it to work for practical reasons such as carrying paperwork, running late, or having to fix the bike. But overall, that combined walk/tram/bike commute remains a cheap, ecofriendly, and practical to commute every day, and I thoroughly appreciate that the city of Strasbourg has created that system.
On the other hand, the city council has adopted what amounts to an anti-car stance which often borders on dives enthusiastically into silliness, such as refusing to adopt smart lights and multiplying one-way streets to make the city less practical for cars. It creates more pollution due to idling and detours than it saves. A policy is at its best when it creates a compelling incentive to change one’s way rather than to forbid or discourage through trick measures.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- ToolGuy "The more aerodynamic, organic shape of the Mark VIII meant ride height was slightly lower than before at 53.6 inches, over 54.2” for the Mark VII."• I am not sure that ride height means what you think it means.Elaboration: There is some possible disagreement about what "ride height" refers to. Some say ground clearance, some say H point (without calling it that), some say something else. But none of those people would use a number of over 4 feet for a stock Mark anything.Then you go on to use it correctly ("A notable advancement in the Mark VIII’s suspension was programming to lower the ride height slightly at high speeds, which assisted fuel economy via improved aerodynamics.") so what do I know. Plus, I ended a sentence with a preposition. 🙂
- ToolGuy The dealer knows best. 🙂
- ToolGuy Cool.
- ToolGuy This truck is the perfect size, and the fuel economy is very impressive.-This post sponsored by ExxonMobil
- ToolGuy If I were Jeep, I would offer a version with better NVH and charge more for it.And then I would offer a version with worse NVH, and charge more for it. (There is an audience for both.)
This is why I prefer to live where I do, unfortunately, that means higher rents, or downsize, which is what I'm having to do, but love the convenience of living where I can walk to the store, or downtown or wherever, mostly by foot, if not by bus when necessary. Plus, I also live close to I-5 and I-90 as I work out in Bellevue, east of Seattle, and it's about a 10 mile commute. Used to take the bus, but when work decided to charge us $150 back in May, I just didn't have the funds handy to buy it, thanks to my meager income. So I drive to work now, every day, and while in the mornings, it's usually not too bad, going home, well, it can be awful some days if I-90 backs up, often for no real reason, other than it just does, but it's the entire Puget Sound that is awful, from Everett, south to Olympia it's bad some days. Anyway, people here have the capability to carry their bikes on bike racks on the buses and then ride in from there to work as they often ride to the bus in the first place. So while we do have options, I don't have a bike, no real place to store one at the moment, and a lack of money has kept me from even entertaining the idea of biking. I keep a car, mostly because it provides me the flexibility to head to Mom's on short notice, or do multiple errands etc, and not have to plan out days in advance to ensure a zip car is available when I need it and all that.
I live in a very congested town near NYC. We went from a 4 car family to 2 cars and 2 bikes. A 91 TransAm, 02 Focus and an 04 RX-8 replaced by an 03 A4. We kept the Acadia for trips with the baby or when friends or family come visiting. Otherwise, we ride our bikes as much as possible. I've been riding to work lately and it takes me 10 to 15 mins, the same time it takes my wife to drive to work. She work in the same business park for a different company. Sometimes, I ride one mile to the train station, drop my bike off for free and take the office shuttle if I don't feel like riding the 2.8 Mile commute. Worked out pretty good so far and we have averaged less than 500 miles a month for both cars combined. Some of which are for weekend trips/vacations and more then half for trips with the baby. Doing our part in consuming less, polluting less and staying healthy. A bike runs on fat and saves you money. A car runs on money and makes you fat!