Junkyard Find: 1974 Dodge D-200 Club Cab Custom

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

When you write about one Malaise Era Dodge pickup, you might as well follow it up with another on the very next day. These days, crew cabs are nearly ubiquitous on big pickups, but the idea of a truck with a back seat in the cab was still something of a novelty in the middle 1970s, so this truck is an interesting truck history lesson.

The idea of using a 3/4-ton pickup truck as a commuter to one’s suburban office-cubicle job hadn’t taken over the country in 1974, and so these trucks were made for hauling construction supplies and large sweaty dudes with hardhats and Thermoses full of bad coffee.

Thus, luxury touches were minimal, and the space behind the front seat was intolerably cramped by 21st-century standards.

Also intolerable by current standards would be a mere 180 horsepower— which is what you got out of this smog-strangled 360— for such a big vehicle.

With a granny-gear 4-speed and a 4.10 gear out back (if we are to believe this truck’s equipment-identification sticker), however, this ’74 probably did just fine hauling cinder blocks around a job site.

Those days are over for this truck. Next stop: The Crusher!








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 21 comments
  • Ranwhenparked Ranwhenparked on Jul 28, 2012

    Chrysler built this body style for ages, we just took a '92 Ram off the road at work that was still essentially the same truck as this '74. I used to love driving that thing, very basic, very utilitarian, but with the 4WD it would climb anything, and in terms of towing, payload capacity, and bed length, it was every bit as utilitarian as the new breed of modern mega-sized trucks. A new F-150 towered over the thing, despite them being allegedly in the same size class. We'll keep it as an off-road plow truck until something really expensive breaks, so it will live for some time yet. What really killed it (besides the board putting money in the budget for a new truck for the first time in like a decade) was the fact that its been getting harder and harder to get parts. For as many of these trucks as Dodge (and Fargo) sold between 1972 and 1993, its really amazing that dealers and parts warehouses really don't keep much in stock for them anymore. It took 3 weeks to get new straps for the fuel tank. These days, if you want to keep an old truck on the road, it had better be a Ford or a Chevy/GMC, Dodges are getting surprisingly tough.

    • See 3 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Jun 13, 2013

      @NoGoYo True. Replacement parts for medium duty and up, commercial trucks are junk. In fact, junkyard OEM parts are the better choice, when you can find them. Then, aging trucks become obsolete by new safety, emissions and capacity. California is the process banning older diesel engines, pre 2010 emissions. It's unknown which states will follow, but yeah, lots more trucks for the 3rd world.

  • Moparman426W Moparman426W on Jul 29, 2012

    Mechanical parts for these are as close as your nearest Auto Zone. Unfortunately body and trim parts weren't reproduced for them for many years until lately. Now a company by the name of Raybuck Auto Body Parts makes every body panel for one, including rockers and floor pans. Precision Restoration Parts is now beginning to make trim and weatherstripping pieces. The original radiator went in my 77 about 4 years ago, so I got a Modine unit from Auto Zone for $160.00.

    • See 2 previous
    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Jul 29, 2012

      @highdesertcat Thanks, I'll pass it on, since he has several old cars and trucks he wants to keep running in addition to his 2012 vehicle.

  • Jkross22 Their bet to just buy an existing platform from GM rather than build it from the ground up seems like a smart move. Building an infrastructure for EVs at this point doesn't seem like a wise choice. Perhaps they'll slow walk the development hoping that the tides change over the next 5 years. They'll probably need a longer time horizon than that.
  • Lou_BC Hard pass
  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Next