Junkyard Find: NO, IT'S NOT A HEMI!

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The good old Chrysler 318 engine has been around since, oh, around the start of the Iron Age. From about 1,000 BC to 2002 AD, the 318 and its LA engine relatives were installed in Chrysler products, and they did a fine job. If it hadn’t been for the cockroach-grade immortality of the Chrysler Slant Six, in fact, we’d probably be talking about the 318 as the most unkillable engine Detroit ever made. In 1992, Chrysler updated the 318 (which had gone to a roller cam a few years before) with high-pressure multi-point fuel injection and more emission-friendly heads… and they called it the 5.2 Magnum, no doubt because the original Dodge Magnum hadn’t been good enough to justify such a cool name. As I discovered in a Denver wrecking yard last week, at least one Dakota owner was proud enough of his Magnum to apply a full-body vinyl wrap to his truck.

I’m hoping that this truck was owned by a shop specializing in hot-rodded Magnums for the off-road crowd, or some sort of outdoorsy engine-related business, because getting a screaming-eagles-and-virgin-forest vinyl wrap job for a Dakota seems somewhat creepy otherwise.

Here it is: Magnum.

I might be talking heresy here, but a Hemi in a Dakota sounds like a fine idea to me.





Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 32 comments
  • Moparman426W Moparman426W on Feb 12, 2012

    There was absolutely nothing wrong with the transmissions in the 90's dakotas. The A-500 that came behind the V6 and 318 2WD models was the 999 torgueflite with an electric overdrive unit added to the tailshaft. Same thing with the A-518 used in the 318 4X4's. It was the rugged 727 with overdrive on the tailshaft. Other than the overdrive they used the same parts as the older torqueflites, even filters and gaskets interchanged. The switch that activates the overdrive was known to go bad, which was an esay fix. Some people even bypassed it and used a toggle switch on the dash. Starvingteacher, the 318 was tougher than a 283 for the same reasons that all other A engines were togher than small block chevies. Higher nickel content in the block, with thicker bulkheads and beefier main caps with bigger bolts. They also used longer and beefier rods and and the head bolts were further from the bore resulting in less bore distortion than a chevy. The mopar also used bigger diameter lifters with wider cam lobes and a better hardening process than the chevy. That was why worn cams were a rare sight on mopars, very common on chevies before they switched to the roller design in 87. The 440 Magnum was a highly respected engine back in the day because it was chrysler's top dog on the street. They only sold around 2k hemi's a year due to the high price, and the majority of those sold ended up on the drag strip, they were a very rare sight on the streets.

    • Wstarvingteacher Wstarvingteacher on Feb 12, 2012

      I wish everyone was able (and did) give such detailed factual responses. Good job.

  • And003 And003 on May 14, 2012

    From where I stand, Murilee, you're not talking heresy. A 3G Hemi would be a perfect powerplant for a Dakota. As for the Magnum engine itself, I could imagine it being installed in an old specialty car from the 1950s, perhaps something from LaDawri or Victress.

  • Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
Next